The Criterion DVD edition of Terrence Malick’s Days of Heaven is presented in the aspect ratio of 1.78:1 on this dual-layer DVD. The image has been enhanced for widescreen televisions.
This director approved transfer presents a rather different looking image when compared to Paramount’s previous DVD edition (and other home video editions.) Previous editions had more of a golden hue to the image that I always thought was intentional, but Malick has corrected the colours, making them look a bit more natural and brighter.
The transfer also looks better and cleaner than the previous DVD, presenting less artifacts and noise. Edge-enhancement can become intrusive on occasion but the image is very sharp, even showcasing some film grain, colours are bright and beautifully saturated, and blacks are fairly deep. The print also exhibits very little damage, though I don’t recall the Paramount edition being that bad as well.
It looks different but it looks good, the photography looking even more magnificent than before. 8/10
All DVD screen captures are presented in their original size from the source disc. Images have been compressed slightly to conserve space. While they are not exact representations they should offer a general idea of overall video quality.
I had high hopes for this DVD edition when it was originally hinted at, but despite it not being the ultimate edition I would have hoped for I did get quite a bit out of the supplements.
First is an audio commentary featuring editor Billy Weber, art director Jack Fisk, costume designer Patricia Norris, and casting director Dianne Crittenden. Short of getting an actual commentary from director Terrence Malick, which will more than likely never happen, this is about as good. All the participants have been recorded together but when they talk they usually stick to their own involvement with the film, only conversing with one another on occasion. Throughout they all offer praise of Malick, and talk about his techniques. Weber’s comments on editing the film—and Badlands—are especially intriguing, offering up information on some of shot material and dialogue that had been cut (a lot.) There’s a lot of information on Malick’s knowledge on film stock, how the light was captured, the tricky matter of filming in Canada (which involved a lot of smuggling back and forth across the border apparently,) and possible alternative casting (it almost sounds like the cast could have been up instead of John Travolta, Genevieve Bujold, and Tommy Lee Jones.) There’s of course also plenty of information on the costumes and sets of the film. I think one of the bigger surprises presented for me was how the studio, Paramount, wasn’t all that concerned about the film and the years it took to edit. More shocking is that key execs loved the film and didn’t even care if the film made money or not. While Norris seems to be a little bitter about Canada and says a couple questionable things (she makes some comments alluding to the attitudes of the Canadian members of the cast and crew I seriously question, especially since other members of the track are caught off guard by them and seem to have no idea what she’s talking about) it’s a decent track, well worth listening to.
The remaining supplements are all interviews.
First we get “actor” interviews with Richard Gere and Sam Shepard, Gere’s recorded exclusively for this release, while Shepard’s is edited from a 2002 interview. Gere’s interview is audio only, played over clips and stills from the film. I almost suspect it was supposed to be a commentary track as it does sound as though he is watching the film, though I can’t say for sure if this was the intention. What we do get here, though, is a surprisingly strong recollection of the film from Gere, and he has many lovely things to say about the film, “Terry,” and his costars. He talks about the lighting, and the long editing process, and also mentions how shocked he was when he saw a rough cut of the finished film; he was surprised to see a lot of the dialogue had been cut out and admits he was actually a bit mad about this at first, saying that the actors could have probably “saved brain cells” if they didn’t have to memorize all the dialogue. He obviously loves the film, though, speaks affectionately about it, calling it a European saga set in America. If there was more it’s actually a shame it’s not included here, but what we do get from Gere is quite good. Shepard’s 12-minute interview focuses mainly on his character and how a man like him lived during the era, even comparing him somewhat to Charles Foster Kane. He also offers a bit on Malick’s presentation of nature. Both are certainly excellent, though it is a bit of a shame they couldn’t get Shepard for a newer interview.
The next set of interviews deal with the cinematography of the film and features interviews with cinematographers John Bailey and Haskell Wexler, running 20-minutes and 12-minutes respectively. Both talk about cinematographer Nestor Almendros, and both touch on the “magic hour” lighting. What seems surprising to me is that some of the more beautiful shots in the film were more or less taken on a whim and captured accidentally. Bailey gets into more detail about lighting while Wexler recalls some specific shots and then explains how he got his “additional” credit.
The booklet presents a nice essay on the film by Adrian Martin, and an excerpt from Nestor Almendros’ autobiography Man with a Camera detailing his work on Days of Heaven, which presents even more wonderful info on the film’s stunning photography. Both are excellent reads.
All around the commentary and interviews offer a lot of insight into the production of the film, the editing, and photography. Disappointingly, though in no way surprising, excised footage is nowhere to be found here. I knew the film morphed into something different over the years of editing, though after listening to the commentary and then the interviews I obviously hadn’t grasped how much the film had changed from its original conception to the finished product. While it would have been nice to maybe see samples, I could understand why Malick, who worked with Criterion on this edition, wouldn’t want to show any hints of what an alternate version would look like.
In all it might look like a disappointing special edition at first glance, but it’s a fairly satisfying and informative release. 8/10