It is currently Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:51 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 272 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:19 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
cpetrizzi wrote:
HitchcockLang wrote:
I am of the tiny camp that has only seen FWWM and never seen the series (I bought the movie on DVD for $3 from Dollar General when I was in high school). I have been eyeing the blu-ray box though. Still, I agree this is a weird choice for Criterion.


I'm of the tinier camp that hasn't seen either. Ten pages here shows amazing support. So I will ask, where should I start in my viewing of all of this?

Watch the pilot, then Season 1, then Season 2 (in its entirety, this used to be optional but now that the new series has so many allusions to the final episodes of Season 2, it's a must), then Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, then The Missing Pieces, then Twin Peaks: The Return (which is Season 3 of the series by another name).

Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is in essence a prequel, but it spoils a great deal of the mysteries that make 1.5 seasons of the original series so compelling.

The best way to approach this would either be to find a copy of the now OOP The Entire Mystery Blu-ray set, or to get a Showtime streaming subscription through Hulu or any number of the other services that offer a Showtime add-on, all of this content (though not sure about The Missing Pieces) is streaming on there.


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:21 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
Chronologically, but just watch the normal pilot, not the extended version.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:22 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:26 am
Location: Burlington, MA
knives wrote:
The pilot for sure.


So watch Season 1&2 then the movie?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:23 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
cpetrizzi wrote:
knives wrote:
The pilot for sure.


So watch Season 1&2 then the movie?

Yes. See my post above.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:41 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:26 am
Location: Burlington, MA
mfunk9786 wrote:
cpetrizzi wrote:
knives wrote:
The pilot for sure.


So watch Season 1&2 then the movie?

Yes. See my post above.


Thanks, mfunk for the advice! Although Twin Peaks (series) came out when I was in college and has a "cult" status, I have no good explanation on why I've never seen it. :roll:

Just ordered this on Amazon for $36.95:
https://www.amazon.com/Twin-Peaks-Colle ... re+mystery

I've actually seen almost all of Lynch's most popular movies (except for Lost Highway & The Straight Story). Seeing Eraserhead (in school) was part of the reason I got into film and TCC. I definitely think Criterion should put out a special Lynch box set or even an Eclipse set; he has so many shorts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Enjoy it! Feel free to keep the forum posted on what you think in our Twin Peaks thread in the TV subforum!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Pretty much everything as it was released starting with the US pilot. People give grief to season 2.5 but the last three episodes are essential to the new series. If the episodes prior to that become unbearable, it's pretty easy to figure out what you can fast-forward to and what's essential. Fire Walk with Me is much more than a prequel, apropriate given the show's concern with time out of loop, so should be saved for after the series. Missing Pieces features as many extended scenes as deleted ones, so is best seen afterwards (and separate: avoid the fan edit).

The books are non-canon, but the Secret History sounds at least interesting and involved with the mythos. But still not necessary to the new series.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
Cold Bishop wrote:
People give grief to season 2.5 but the last three episodes are essential to the new series. If the episodes prior to that become unbearable, it's pretty easy to figure out what you can fast-forward

Just every scene with James in it. The rest is fine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR
I think most of the comedic sideplots could probably be fast forwarded in a pinch, as they're all pretty one note premises repeated ad nauseum. Although your mileage will vary depending how much you enjoy the actors involved (the Civil War plot is woeful, but the actors are clearly enjoying themselves, for example).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
Oh, I forgot about the Civil War plot--skip that too!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:45 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Poor James in that second season, though its the kind of disappointment I could imagine people feeling had James Dean lived and seen him trapped in formulaic film plots rather than burn out young and at his height, so I still can kind of tolerate the subplot, albeit barely!

You are all getting my hopes up too much that the third season satisfactorily deals with that small matter of


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 3:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:45 pm
well, there was that hum in the Great Northern, perhaps that is tied to it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 6:15 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
If I remember correctly there was a moment in the show that was shot and cut that had Cooper finding
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Chen's body in the Red Room, with her head under the curtain, suggesting her conscious soul was forever trapped in the wood of the Great Northern, and there's a scene that was abbreviated where Pete sees her face in the fire - I might be wrong but I think we see the tail end of it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:23 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am
DVD Beaver.

Ps am I crazy or did they botch another Lynch encode?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:28 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
He suggests this is clearly superior but only compares to the French Blu-ray. How did that compare to the U.S. version bundled with the original series? (For instance, he's counting the addition of The Missing Pieces as a selling point, but most of us already have that.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:35 pm
There's comparable caps on the Twin Peaks: The Entire Mystery review, but I dunno why he didn't just port those over. Comparing the caps, I actually think the Criterion appears to be better-encoded than the box set Blu-Ray.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:47 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
The grabs look virtually identical to the Missing Pieces caps. Still getting this for the new interviews, but... yeah. I don't know if anyone who has the box set has to rush out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
I am actually kind of impressed that despite this being ~300 minutes of content on a single disc the encoding does actually look anything more than the marginally better than the other disc. I wish they'd have broken it up to give it just a bit more room still, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 8:52 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Blu-ray.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 10:56 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:05 pm
How do all these reviewers not know how it compares to the 2014 US release?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
kcota17 wrote:
How do all these reviewers not know how it compares to the 2014 US release?

Because it's Svet, and like for Mulholland Dr, if there's a way to say the Criterion is better than a past release, he'll choose that instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:27 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:32 am
I watched the new interview with Angelo Badalamenti tonight, and Criterion's sort of dropped the ball here. When he's describing the writing of "Laura Palmer's Theme" (itself a fairly well-known anecdote among Peaks fans), the background music is, instead, "Falling," the opening theme to the show. It's weird to hear Badalamenti talking about the melody of one piece while another plays, and it makes me think that whoever edited the interview didn't pay very close attention.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 272 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection