BD 25 Touch of Evil

Discuss DVDs and Blu-rays released by Eureka/Masters of Cinema and the films on them. If it's got a spine number, it's in here.
Forum rules
Please do not clutter up the threads for MoC titles with information on pre-orders. You can announce the availability of pre-orders in the MoC: Cheapest Prices / Best Places to Buy / Pre-Orders thread. Any posts on pre-orders in any other thread will be deleted.
Message
Author
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#76 Post by MichaelB » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:21 am

Tribe wrote:As much as I like the attempt at a reconstruction, I can't watch that opening sequence without hearing that Mancini score, whether it's there or not. That's how I grew accustomed to watching it.
I agree - it may not have been part of Welles' original plan, but it just sounds "wrong" to me without the music.

For similar reasons I personally prefer the "Soviet" cuts of Andrei Rublev and The Colour of Pomegranates, as they're the versions I grew up with. I'm glad to have seen the alternative versions but, as with Touch of Evil, it's by no means clear-cut whether they're artistically superior. And in the case of Rublev in particular the shorter cut contains definite editorial improvements that Tarkovsky himself opted to make.

User avatar
John Hodson
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Near dark satanic mills...
Contact:

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#77 Post by John Hodson » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:43 am

Sounds 'wrong' here too for the same reasons, though plainly it isn't - I can see the artistic intent.

User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#78 Post by Roger Ryan » Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:13 am

matrixschmatrix wrote:In the Bogdonovich interview, Welles said that one hadn't been changed much- I think he said the major alterations were a shitty score they'd put on and a tour de force funhouse sequence they'd cut out.
Welles hated the score the most, but SHANGHAI suffered from significant reworking. Welles was forced to re-shoot quite a few scenes simply because Harry Cohn wanted more glamor close-ups of Rita Hayworth, so there are much more questionable process shots done in the studio than there should be. Having read through the cutting continuity for the film as assembled prior to the re-shoots and re-editing, it is clear that Welles' initial cut was a lot more coherent and interesting. Amazingly, numerous transition scenes that clarified the film's actions were eliminated (probably amounting to less than 5 or 6 minutes of screentime). Major set-pieces were bungled: Welles originally handled the climb up the mountain in Acapulco as a series of long tracking shots in which various tourists weave in and out of the frame all discussing money or lack thereof as Grisby tells O'Hara of his plan. The current scene is an awkward mess of original footage interrupted by poorly done process shot inserts with the interesting tourist subtext wiped out. So many important expository scenes were eliminated that Welles had to write a first-person narration to cover all the gaps (his original cut did not feature O'Hara as a narrator).
Drucker wrote:Though not on topic exactly, why ISN'T there a cult around lost Shanghai footage? Wasn't the original cut 2.5 hours? Or was that all erased/destroyed like...during filming?
Yes, the original edit and footage are long gone.

Back on topic, I would say that TOUCH OF EVIL is really the film that wasn't changed that much from what Welles wanted. We may question the authenticity of the sound mix or the changes in Mancini's score (Welles liked this score by the way), but the film is not missing 30 or more minutes like SHANGHAI and the re-shoots not done by Welles amount to less than five minutes (in the reconstruction version). The story arc and all the main set-pieces are what Welles intended. Also, I might add, if there was a "royally screwed" version, it was the one screened for Welles, which apparently suffered from a number of continuity issues. Welles addressed these and those problems, for the most part, were fixed for the preview version.

While I agree that the reconstruction was not an attempt to restore a "Director's Cut", I suspect that if we were able to compare it to a pure Welles edit we wouldn't see significant differences.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#79 Post by hearthesilence » Thu Aug 25, 2011 2:37 pm

I never got used to the previous cuts, just the 1998 reconstruction, so I never had the jarring experience that is almost inevitable for a change that major. If anything, the older versions became jarring for me - music's not bad at all, but it really feels like someone plastered all this extra shit (credits and music) on top of a DAMN fine opening sequence. In other words, I can enjoy the Mancini score for the music itself, but it really diminishes everything that's accomplished in that tracking shot.

eerik
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:53 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#80 Post by eerik » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:00 am

Screenshots from reconstructed version, 1.37:1:

http://eurekavideo.co.uk/nick/TouchOfEv ... _01-24.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://eurekavideo.co.uk/nick/TouchOfEv ... 3_01-9.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://eurekavideo.co.uk/nick/TouchOfEv ... _01-27.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://eurekavideo.co.uk/nick/TouchOfEv ... 3_1-28.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Jarpie
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Finland

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#81 Post by Jarpie » Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:31 am

Those screenshots looks a bit odd, hopefully not the final look of the film. Looks like been through somekind of filter.

User avatar
andyli
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#82 Post by andyli » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:13 am

The anomaly looks very much like Universal's Psycho.

Jarpie
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Finland

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#83 Post by Jarpie » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:47 am

Those screenshots look like they've been converted to lower colours from the original, like 32bit palette to 256 palette. Especially here. I didn't see anything like that in Psycho.

User avatar
peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:41 pm

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#84 Post by peerpee » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:28 am

Correction. They were not BD grabs. They were taken quickly from MPEGStreamClip.

Will post BD grabs in a couple of weeks!

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#85 Post by mfunk9786 » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:33 am

You'd better, Jarpie will not stand for anything but the best.

Jarpie
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Finland

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#86 Post by Jarpie » Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:48 am

peerpee wrote:Correction. They were not BD grabs. They were taken quickly from MPEGStreamClip.

Will post BD grabs in a couple of weeks!
Ah, thanks for the correction. Should always trust in MoC :P.

User avatar
antnield
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Cheltenham, England

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#87 Post by antnield » Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:59 pm

Full specs confirmed:
LIMITED EDITION 2 x BLU-RAY ONLY

• New high-definition masters of five variants of the film: the 1958 Theatrical Version in both 1.37:1 and 1.85:1, the 1958 Preview Version in 1.85:1, and the 1998 Reconstructed Version in 1.37:1 and 1.85:1
• 4 x audio commentaries, featuring: restoration producer Rick Schmidlin; actors Charlton Heston & Janet Leigh, with Schmidlin; critic F. X. Feeney; and Welles scholars James Naremore & Jonathan Rosenbaum
• The original theatrical trailer, which includes alternate footage
• Bringing Evil to Life + Evil Lost and Found – two video pieces [21:00 + 18:00]
• Optional English SDH subtitles on all versions of the film
• A 56-page booklet featuring essays by Orson Welles, François Truffaut, André Bazin, and Terry Comito; interview excerpts with Welles; a timeline of the film’s history; and extensive notes on the film’s versions and ratios

User avatar
andyli
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#88 Post by andyli » Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:47 pm

four commentaries! Gosh! Looks like two are from the Universal DVD and the other two are new!

User avatar
stevewhamola
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:20 pm
Location: NWT, Canada

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#89 Post by stevewhamola » Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:06 pm

andyli wrote:four commentaries! Gosh! Looks like two are from the Universal DVD and the other two are new!
Nope, the Universal had the same four commentaries.

Preview Version:
- Charlton Heston, Janet Leigh and Rick Schmidlin
- Jonathan Rosenbaum and James Naremore

Restored Version:
- Rick Schmidlin

Theatrical Version:
- F.X. Feeney

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#90 Post by matrixschmatrix » Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:24 pm

Honestly, the US Universal package was so exhaustive and excellent that it's hard to begrudge MoC not bettering it in terms of extras- particularly when I would buy this one bare-bones.

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#91 Post by Drucker » Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:50 pm

Re-reading the old thread about Touch of Evil's release with all three versions...it seems that the only problem people had was with the aspect ratios.
The commentaries are fantastic...I've only listened to 2 of them, but they are incredibly informative (especially showing which scenes Welles didn't shoot...some of which aren't as obvious).

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#92 Post by manicsounds » Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:05 am

All 4 commentaries are excellent, listened to them back to back pretty recently. The Schmidlin solo commentary is the best, but I still think it should be listened to last, as it was recorded after the deaths of Heston and Leigh, and a lot more thought on everything in hindsight.

The laserdisc-recorded Heston/Leigh/Schmidlin commentary (which was done when the restoration was finished but not sure if it was actually released on LD) is also good, and should be heard before the solo track.

User avatar
skuhn8
wax on; wax off
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#93 Post by skuhn8 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:09 am

Dear Peerpee,

I understand from the Repo Man thread that HMV will offer an MOC 'Touch of Evil' Steelbook. Likely an exclusive offer, I want to check whether this will made available directly via Eureka as well.

Seems to be very difficult to comprehend in that thread, so I hope the above query is clear enough.

User avatar
peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:41 pm

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#94 Post by peerpee » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:57 am

The only MoC product that will be exclusive to a particular retailer is the TOUCH OF EVIL Steelbook, which will be an HMV exclusive.

"HMV exclusive" unfortunately means that it won't be available from anywhere else.

My hope is that no future MoC products are made exclusive to a particular retailer, and if they are, there will be a time limit on that exclusivity.

User avatar
skuhn8
wax on; wax off
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#95 Post by skuhn8 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:19 am

Thanks, Chief. Just wanted to confirm.

User avatar
Duncan Hopper
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:16 am
Location: http://www.eldiabolik.com
Contact:

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#96 Post by Duncan Hopper » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:29 am

I've been wondering about this for a while, can someone who buys steelbooks enlighten me on why they are so desirable? I just don't see the attraction, but I'm genuinely interested why people want to them.

User avatar
skuhn8
wax on; wax off
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#97 Post by skuhn8 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:18 am

Duncan Hopper wrote:I've been wondering about this for a while, can someone who buys steelbooks enlighten me on why they are so desirable? I just don't see the attraction, but I'm genuinely interested why people want to them.
Heavy handling. I keep my blu-rays and good proportion of my AV equipment next to my half-pipe skate ramp. Stuff takes a beating there. I really should move the stuff, but the rest of the cage is taken up with several live animals going through a rough teething phase.

User avatar
Duncan Hopper
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:16 am
Location: http://www.eldiabolik.com
Contact:

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#98 Post by Duncan Hopper » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:11 am

Anyone who just lives in a normal house with DVDs on a shelf? Without teething animals and half-pipes?

User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#99 Post by willoneill » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:58 am

Duncan Hopper wrote:Anyone who just lives in a normal house with DVDs on a shelf? Without teething animals and half-pipes?
Some people like collector's edition packaging, which steelbooks would be classified as. As well, there are some steelbooks that become very valuable because of their rarity, but I think this is less common now because more volume is produced for newer ones.

And some people just think they look cool, which I'll admit I do, but I'm also a pragmatist, which is why I can only bring myself to buy them when they're similarly priced to the regular edition.

User avatar
swo17
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: BD 25 Touch of Evil

#100 Post by swo17 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:03 pm

I only bought Metropolis in a steelbook because it seemed oddly fitting in that instance, but it would seem weird to me to have Touch of Evil that way. Silent Running being another sci-fi, the steelbook seems fitting again. I don't know what I'll do going forward. Is Repo Man enough of a sci-fi to be forever encased on my shelf in steel? Will TLB in a metal case mimic the sleek exterior of a '55 Chevy? Part of me wishes I did not have to answer these kinds of questions.

Post Reply