Criterion and Fox / MGM / Universal

News on Criterion and Janus Films.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#101 Post by oldsheperd » Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:04 pm

Antoine Doinel wrote:I wonder if Clockers is a possibility given the current DVD is barebones and also Universal's recent BD announcement of Do The Right Thing (packed with the extras from Criterion's DVD release).
I've always been hoping for a CC of Clockers. I think it is tremendously underrated. I think Crooklyn should be added to that list as well.

I certainly wouldn't mind a CC of Duck Soup. It's arguably the Marx Bros.' best work and pretty politically savvy to boot. The MGM edition is pretty light. The box set only has like an extra disc with some vintage interviews. I was hoping Universal would have put something out more akin to the Warners box.

User avatar
MoonlitKnight
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#102 Post by MoonlitKnight » Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:20 am

oldsheperd wrote:
Antoine Doinel wrote:I certainly wouldn't mind a CC of Duck Soup. It's arguably the Marx Bros.' best work and pretty politically savvy to boot. The MGM edition is pretty light. The box set only has like an extra disc with some vintage interviews. I was hoping Universal would have put something out more akin to the Warners box.
As much as I like "Duck Soup," I don't get why almost everybody thinks it's the Marxes' best. Many of its jokes strike me as rather...obvious (the motorcycle/side car gag -- all 3 times, the mirror gag, etc.) compared to some of their other movies. For me, "A Night at the Opera," "Horse Feathers," "Animal Crackers," and "Monkey Business" are all funnier. To each his own, I guess. :?

HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#103 Post by HarryLong » Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:15 pm

I can't speak for others, but one reason I think DUCK SOUP the best is that the anarchy of the Marxes' comedy style in forms (infects?) the plotting of the film as well. There's a situation established and then a series of (for lack of a better word) sketches follow. They are prompted by the plot but they don't necessarily advance it, though they sometimes lurch the audience ahead into it. A huge production number starts out & then simply disintegrates into a series of blackout jokes that then transitions into the final sequence of the film.

Any of their other films are, by comparison plot-bound.

And once at MGM they ended up always in the service of uniting the young lovers (a set-up that wouldn't be ditched until NIGHT IN CASABLANCA). Such things should be left to Mary Worth.

Oggilby
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:31 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#104 Post by Oggilby » Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:47 pm

Whether it's Universal or Criterion, Horse Feathers and Animal Crackers need the most work. HF has a section with a ton of splices. There has to be a film source somewhere in the world that's intact.

Also, I think all of the Paramount Marx films are supposed to be 1.20:1 except for Duck Soup. They're all cropped to fit 4x3 and it's kind of obvious.

User avatar
MoonlitKnight
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#105 Post by MoonlitKnight » Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:56 pm

HarryLong wrote:... one reason I think DUCK SOUP the best is that the anarchy of the Marxes' comedy style in forms (infects?) the plotting of the film as well. There's a situation established and then a series of (for lack of a better word) sketches follow. They are prompted by the plot but they don't necessarily advance it, though they sometimes lurch the audience ahead into it. A huge production number starts out & then simply disintegrates into a series of blackout jokes that then transitions into the final sequence of the film.

Any of their other films are, by comparison plot-bound.

And once at MGM they ended up always in the service of uniting the young lovers (a set-up that wouldn't be ditched until NIGHT IN CASABLANCA). Such things should be left to Mary Worth.
That's kind of what I thought. But for me, when it comes to comedy, laughs take precedence over structure...and there weren't as many of them for me in "Duck Soup" than in the other 4 I mentioned.

Props55
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:55 am

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#106 Post by Props55 » Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:56 pm

Good God Harry, I haven't even thought of Mary Worth in decades! The last of the four-panel daily comic "soaps". My synapses are firing like an acid flashback and I'm dying for a double vodka and tonic! Thanks for the memories! :D

User avatar
PfR73
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:07 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#107 Post by PfR73 » Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:00 pm

No banging your head on the display case, please; it contains a very rare Mary Worth in which she has advised a friend to commit suicide. Thank you.

AfterTheRain
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:42 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#108 Post by AfterTheRain » Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:43 pm

Here in Salem, OR, we're having a screening of Mark Rydell's The Rose on Saturday as part of the film festival taking place. In the paper announcing this, it says right below the description: "Print Courtesy of 20th Century Fox & Criterion". This makes me wonder if this might be up for a future Criterion release. Something to look into, if you ask me.

User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#109 Post by Cinephrenic » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:07 pm

AfterTheRain wrote: "Print Courtesy of 20th Century Fox & Criterion".
This comes up every once in a while. Criterion Pictures is a sister company of 20th century Fox and NOT related to the Criterion Collection in any way.

AfterTheRain
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:42 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#110 Post by AfterTheRain » Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:15 am

Cinephrenic wrote:This comes up every once in a while. Criterion Pictures is a sister company of 20th century Fox and NOT related to the Criterion Collection in any way.
I did some research and found out that The Rose IS NOT a Criterion Picture; looks like the CC may have acquired this for future release, but too early to tell.

User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#111 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:21 am

It's still listed in Criterion Pictures' catalog. Where did you hear they don't have it anymore?

User avatar
Tribe
The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#112 Post by Tribe » Sat Apr 18, 2009 9:52 am

Is The Rose serious speculation...or is it just one of those things pulled out of someone's ass? Jesus, The Rose would be a frightening prospect.

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#113 Post by Jeff » Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:26 am

AfterTheRain wrote:I did some research and found out that The Rose IS NOT a Criterion Picture; looks like the CC may have acquired this for future release, but too early to tell.
Criterion Pictures is the theatrical distributor for all of Fox's rep. catalog. If any of Fox's catalog product plays in a theater, it will be distributed by Criterion Pictures. Even if (God forbid) the Criterion Collection were releasing The Rose, they wouldn't be credited in an acknowledgment for the print.

Narshty
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#114 Post by Narshty » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:44 pm

I guess only me and Pauline Kael would be happy to see The Rose in the collection.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#115 Post by domino harvey » Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:15 pm

I just had to Wikipedia this to make sure you all weren't talking about that Bette Midler film. Imagine my surprise...

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#116 Post by HerrSchreck » Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:30 pm

Good lord, could you imagine? That would just about nuke the excitement of this relatively nice month.

"Criterion Collection, a joint venture with Janus Films to bring to home video a bunch of color films running mostly between the 1960's and the present.."

User avatar
Tribe
The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#117 Post by Tribe » Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:05 pm

domino harvey wrote:I just had to Wikipedia this to make sure you all weren't talking about that Bette Midler film. Imagine my surprise...
You mean we're not? I'm actually relieved if I misunderstood.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#118 Post by domino harvey » Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:54 pm

My point was more along the lines of YIKES. The only saving grace would be that it'd take the heat off Monsoon Wedding

User avatar
Tribe
The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#119 Post by Tribe » Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:26 pm

A two disc box set: The Rose with A Star Is Born (1976 version).

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#120 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:35 pm

I'd be more excited for the Jackie Jormp-Jomp bio-pic.

User avatar
Gregor Samsa
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 4:41 am

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#121 Post by Gregor Samsa » Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:28 pm

flyonthewall2983 wrote:I'd be more excited for the Jackie Jormp-Jomp bio-pic.
How about a nice deluxe edition of Black Cop White Cop while we're at it? :wink:

User avatar
Zumpano
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:43 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#122 Post by Zumpano » Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:52 pm

Tribe wrote:A two disc box set: The Rose with A Star Is Born (1976 version).
These would be the Halloween releases, no?

User avatar
Andre Jurieu
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:38 pm
Location: Back in Milan (Ind.)

One does the duty; the other gets the booty!

#123 Post by Andre Jurieu » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:09 pm

Gregor Samsa wrote:
flyonthewall2983 wrote:I'd be more excited for the Jackie Jormp-Jomp bio-pic.
How about a nice deluxe edition of Black Cop White Cop while we're at it? :wink:
Those films are uninspired, pedestrian, hack-work compared to Honky Grandma be Trippin', which I think we can all agree is the only film within his oeuvre that deserves the lavish Criterion treatment.

User avatar
geoffcowgill
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:48 pm

Re: One does the duty; the other gets the booty!

#124 Post by geoffcowgill » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:19 pm

I don't know. After pulling out all the stops with the lavish Imamura box set and The Human Condition on the way, I imagine more Japanese films, like Who Dat Ninja, are likelier choices.

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Re: Fox and Universal Licenses

#125 Post by ianungstad » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:53 pm

Well, Criterion obviously has some kind of deal set up with Universal's arthouse label Focus Features, with both Monsoon Wedding and Cronos coming out in the near future.

Some possibilities that I think Criterion would be interested in out of Focus's catalogue:

Lost Highway (current DVD has no special features)
21 Grams (current DVD has no special features)
Secrets and Lies (out of print)
Breaking the Waves (out of print)
The Idiots (out of print)
Kika (out of print)
Cookie's Fortune (out of print)
Year of the Horse (out of print)
The Wedding Banquet (via Good Machine, out of print)
Ride with the Devil (via Good Machine, has almost no special features)
Far From Heaven
The Motorcycle Diaries

The head of Focus James Schamus obviously has a very close relationship with Ang Lee and he did the commentary with Ang on the Criterion Ice Storm. I would be surprised if The Wedding Banquet wasn't included in this deal. (I'm making the assumption that MGM's home video rights lapsed and they reverted back to Good Machine, much like most of the October Films stuff.)

While unlikely, Mulvaney did say another Altman title is in the works. Gosford Park is a Focus title. The current dvd is pretty loaded..but that hasn't seemed to deter Criterion as of late, so who knows. Cookie's Fortune seems much more likely to be the forthcoming Altman.
Last edited by ianungstad on Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply