David Mamet

[therewillbeblus]

It's kinda fitting that David Mamet's dedicated thread has mirrored his career trajectory from hailing his artistic merits to directionless political discourse

[Vincejansenist]

The three most popular professions for pedophiles are surely teachers, politicians, and filmmaking, so I think we can probably all find common ground here.

[hearthesilence]

I could've sworn it was priests and scout leaders.

[denti alligator]

Where do you draw the line on „government provision of public services“? That‘s my only point. These same people (more than relatives—I‘ll include the guy who cuts my hair) point in fear to the „socialism“ of western Europe—seriously. More government provisions for more public services. I ask which ones they want to include and which leave out. The same basic principles apply, no? The police is funded in the same way as our schools: taxes. Mainstream Republican ideology absolutely wants to minimize or eliminate taxes and the „public services“ that they fund.

[HJackson]

Suggesting that supporting the police, as part of some minimal night-watchman state, is a form of socialism because it’s funded by taxation is simply to empty the word socialism of all meaning beyond “not pure anarchism”, which I’m not sure is particularly productive.

As Brian has pointed out, small state conservatives and libertarians have provided answers to these questions over the years - perhaps not to your satisfaction, but this certainly isn’t a new or original problem with which they are unfamiliar.

Now you suggest that “the same basic principles apply” to the justification of all possible public services and frame it as a question of drawing lines, but that’s just wrong isn’t it. How do the principles that justify a legal system and police force extend to justify, say, a state-operated travel agents?

[swo17]

The word "socialism" has already been drained of all meaning.

I wouldn't recommend arguing politics with someone while they cut your hair

[denti alligator]

Suggesting that supporting the police, as part of some minimal night-watchman state, is a form of socialism because it’s funded by taxation is simply to empty the word socialism of all meaning beyond “not pure anarchism”, which I’m not sure is particularly productive.

That‘s precisely my point. The way in which the right in this country uses the term is completely emptied of meaning and unproductive. I think we must be talking past one another here. And anyway, one person‘s travel agency is another person‘s sidewalk. Or another person‘s health care. Or another person‘s police department.

If it‘s not about drawing lines, then what is it? We have public swimming pools on the one hand and police departments on the other. Are you saying this isn‘t a basic principle connecting these two? I‘d say there is, even if only a general „public good.“

[therewillbeblus]

Who needs haircuts when you have hats?

[Brian C]

Where do you draw the line on „government provision of public services“? That‘s my only point. These same people (more than relatives—I‘ll include the guy who cuts my hair) point in fear to the „socialism“ of western Europe—seriously. More government provisions for more public services. I ask which ones they want to include and which leave out. The same basic principles apply, no? The police is funded in the same way as our schools: taxes. Mainstream Republican ideology absolutely wants to minimize or eliminate taxes and the „public services“ that they fund.

I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say here. What "principles" are you even referring to? That any public services are "socialism"? It doesn't sound like you have any more idea of what socialism is than these imaginary people you're shutting down with one inane gotcha question in arguments.

[zedz]

The word "socialism" has already been drained of all meaning.

I wouldn't recommend arguing politics with someone while they cut your hair

Case in point.

[denti alligator]

I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say here. What "principles" are you even referring to? That any public services are "socialism"? It doesn't sound like you have any more idea of what socialism is than these imaginary people you're shutting down with one inane gotcha question in arguments.

Brian, I‘ll admit that my question and answer is facile. But yes, the principle I‘m referring to is government-run (and in some cases government-subsidized) public services. In no democratic socialist western European country are the means of production publicly owned. Socialism, in these states, means more government-run and government-guaranteed services. Paid for by higher taxes. These are democratic socialist countries. The ones my hairdresser fears the US will become if it expands our social services. Sure, it’s stupid to say the police and my local swimming pool are socialist; but it‘s just as stupid to say universal health care is socialist. That‘s my only point.
Now where is the infighting break-away thread for this discussion with clever socialist hairdresser title?

[DarkImbecile]

[domino harvey]

I mean, maybe, especially given his puckish response to Maher a few days prior to the more inflammatory remarks, where upon being informed that page 2 of his book has a factual error, he just advises readers to still read it but skip page two. But I think hoping it’s all an act is wishful thinking, really. His recent works are legit like they come from a different author, I don’t see why his beliefs shouldn’t also reflect that disparity

[beamish14]

That's a pretty needlessly harsh assessment of Pinter by Schrader. He slowed down as a playwright because he was one of the greatest screenwriters we had, but his later works for the stage are as good as anything he produced. He also wrote perhaps the greatest Nobel Prize lecture ever.

[therewillbeblus]

Not sure if this is common practice for this particular reviewer on the other forum, but I laughed at this added 'warning' to the Audio review for Heist, particularly when he tries to seamlessly transition back to what he was supposed to be doing (italics imposed by me):

Sony supplies an English DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 Surround mix (1769 kbps, 16-bit) and a lossy Spanish-dub stereo track. I wish that Sony had employed 24-bit and given the 5.1 track a maxed out bitrate. I had to really turn up my receiver to get the full amp of the explosions and other ambient effects. Composer Theodore Shapiro's jazzy and propulsive action score keeps the shifty plot gears churning.

One important point to make about the dialogue is its characteristically "Mametspeak." Theater and film critics have defined this as having "coarse, rapid-fire, naturalistic dialogue" (Dave Larsen) that's "rhythmic, pro­fane yet poetic patter of street­wise raconteurs" (AP critic). Heist is more spare and minimalist than the other plays and films Mamet has wrote. It does have witty and terse one-liners. Mamet wants viewers to focus on the story and characters, not the cadences. Dialogue is solidly rendered on the English track.

Optional English SDH as well as Spanish and French subtitles are available.