Finch wrote:hearthesilence wrote:Hannah's Blu-Ray has gotten poor reviews (allegedly an inconsistent and occasionally noisy transfer) so beware.
Where are those poor reviews? HTF gave the video 4/5 (generous IMO), Blu-Ray.com gave it 3/5 and most other reviews I've found are about the same. It's true the transfer is inconsistent and exhibits noise in places but it's by no means "poor" and a substantial enough improvement over the lacklustre DVD (though you could argue that the Blu-Ray is, on its own terms, lacklustre as well). I, for one, don't regret buying the disc. The only outright pan also disses the film (undeservedly) so in my book the reviewer in question can get stuffed.
Fair enough. I don't like the DVD either, I wouldn't buy it over the Blu-Ray, that's for sure, but the Blu-Ray disc is still a huge letdown for me.
FWIW, I don't put that much trust into 'official' reviews from review sites anymore, from my experience, they're too inconsistent, unless the disc is absolutely terrible. If there's something wrong with a transfer, from my experience, the best bet is to wait for a collective confirmation of that discovery - someone will pick up on it, post about it, and if they're right, a continuous stream of customers will confirm and post accordingly.
I thought the Amazon reviewer here gave a pretty good rundown of what I don't like about the disc:
Where should I start? The one word that sums up this entire transfer (that I can post here on Amazon) is INCONSISTENT from start to finish. Outdoor scenes fare the best but with less perceived resolution than a recent viewing from HD Net Movies. Indoor shots are a grain festival and NOT the good kind of grain either. In fact ,the grain gets so thick at times that all shadow detail is lost along with whatever the camera is focused on. I am talking REALLY BAD here folks. Believe me, I would like nothing more than to tell you this transfer is up to or close to the 'Annie Hall' disc which , while not reference material, is still very good and satisfying to watch.
Colors are all over the place. At time they are "normal" looking, other times you get pink faces, amber faces, grain obscured faces, everything but NORMAL looking faces. Yes I do know this is a Woody Allen film but I would tend to think this is NOT what he had in mind for the look of his film.
If you still are not convinced and purchase this anyway, FF to the Thanksgiving scene at the end for an example and be prepared to be very disappointed in what you see. (muddy, murky, overly grainy with image details breaking up all around)
Please remember, this is my all time favorite Woody Allen film and I am not trashing the video for any other reason than to save you a few bucks. The DVD released a few years back looks better than this Blu Ray disc at least when it comes to uniformity in brightness/contrast levels.
There are moments where things looks GREAT and you pray they will just keep looking that way. Then they take a sharp dip and you are back in super dark grain infested murkiness again. I can not believe for one moment Woody Allen saw and approved this disc. It honestly looks like it was slopped together from more than one source. At times there is no grain what-so-ever which of course means the DNR has been liberally applied in those spots, then it reverts back to a high fiber diet!
Good thing I kept my EPIX version on the DVR! MGM had it together for a lot of the HD transfers of Woody Allen's back catalog I have seen on TV lately. It is very unfortunate they were not involved in THIS particular release. As it stands, FOX has really messed this one up and I am so very disappointed with this transfer.