It is currently Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:08 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:29 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana
I agree with Brian here. The idea that SNL had sketches that were hit after hit just isn't true. People only really remember the good sketches like Belushi's Samurai or Chris Farley's Chippendale's Routine because they've all floated to the top and stayed there. All the really awful stuff has just been buried. Some of the current stuff makes me laugh sure but there's trash too. Chadwick Boseman had a sketch involving inflatable dogs that took place while a building was burning and there were explosions going on. I saw stupefied as to what the hell I was supposed to be laughing at.

Kate McKinnon is the standout though. I imagine she'll go on to do great things once she's done with SNL.


Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Yeah that Boseman sketch was a clunker. But stuff like that is easy for me to get past - the writers tried something weird, it didn’t take, oh well, everyone moves on.

For me, mfunk’s criticism of the political stuff rings 100% true with Baldwin’s Trump sketches. The first time he did it, it was a breath of fresh air in a way - everyone was doing Trump gags, of course, but no one really sank to Trump’s gutter level like Baldwin did. Like, Hammond’s trump was all about bragging about his hotels and saying “classy” a lot, but Baldwin really took on the full awfulness of the guy and stopped treating him with kid gloves. He deserves credit for that if nothing else.

But now those sketches are an awful drag on the show. They’re pitifully lazy, both in the writing and performance, and besides not being funny, it’s hard to see half the time how they’re even trying to be funny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 1:59 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Well, and they're at such a weird point with the Celebrity impersonators for literally every single new Trump-related person. Like, Obama or Bush's impersonators didn't necessarily appear every week during their presidency, so the infrequency of Baldwin appearing doesn't really bother me so much as that they seem just incapable of having anyone new in the political orbit be played by actual cast members of the show. Take this weekend's - the joke only works as a play on Meet the Parents, which means you need to have the two celebrities from the movie. But the joke is lazy because it's not like they already had Ben Stiller or Robert De Niro playing those characters - then the joke would have been better, probably, and felt more earned, instead of feeling like they literally just got the two of them to get Youtube views for a really pretty cheap joke.

I also think part of it is, due to assuming that Trump would lose, they kind of unwittingly were left without a really good starry part for Kate McKinnon when she's clearly the center of the show as it is right now. Kellyanne Conway just isn't in the news enough to merit her appearing more than very infrequently, and Jeff Sessions has the same problem (plus, it's not actually a very entertaining impression). Beck Bennett has probably built up to be the second most notable member of the cast (well, after Kenan, too, I guess) simply by being able to play two heavy political figures. But by having literally every single new person be played by someone already famous it's really threatening the show's ability to turn people famous which is essential for it to get back on the upswing part of the cycle where the show is more generally well liked.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC
I only watched a tiny bit of the show, but it's a tired crowd-pleaser to regurgitate well-known scenes from a popular film or TV show. It takes no thought whatsoever - you just need a different context, get the original actors if possible, and then pretty much copy said scene word for word and watch the audience holler. A lazy old trick, like doing a song that name-checks the city you're in, and to be fair everyone does it, not just SNL, but they typically lean on that way too much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:17 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Ribs wrote:
I also think part of it is, due to assuming that Trump would lose, they kind of unwittingly were left without a really good starry part for Kate McKinnon when she's clearly the center of the show as it is right now. Kellyanne Conway just isn't in the news enough to merit her appearing more than very infrequently, and Jeff Sessions has the same problem (plus, it's not actually a very entertaining impression).

I like McKinnon but there's definitely some "Ewing theory" potential if she left. She really sucks up so much of the show's oxygen and has a more limited range than the show seems to think she does. Every time there is a new political figure that surfaces, McKinnon is there to play them as sort of an "oh my god, isn't that amazing that she's playing [insert male politician here]?!" stunt, which is almost as insufferable as the celebrity casting stuff. McKinnon and Strong both feel as if they've hit the high point of their time on the show and then outstayed their welcome, but I just find Strong to be the much more funny and versatile one of the two.

And while I already am coming off like I have some bias against female cast members, I might as well go a little further and add the rather risky opinion that Leslie Jones is absolutely terrible in sketches. The show seems to be doing less and less to appeal to her strength, which is usually just her playing with some variation on herself like she has on Update so successfully. The moment she's delivering key cue card lines in a sketch she usually fumbles the ball, which is a bummer, because she's an incredibly likable presence and obviously has a really bright future in showbusiness.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 3:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL
I don't agree with McKinnon's Ewing Theory potential, or Strong either for that matter, but I suppose I understand where you're coming from. Lord knows I felt exactly that same way about Wiig during her last few years (although her sendoff was a really lovely moment in the show's history).

Jones is pretty awful with the cue cards, no question. I think she's otherwise a fine performer, but it does break up the momentum of her sketches when she struggles with the cards. If she does a stand-up show around here, I'll happily pay to go see her.

The Stiller/De Niro thing ... ugh. It was a real shame, because getting Stiller to play Cohen seemed like a masterstroke; no one does belligerent buffoonery quite like he does. But then it just turned into a Fockers thing. What a waste. Actually kind of sad, really.

Still, I don't generally mind the "stunt casting" all that much on principle - most of the celebs they get are either alums of the show (even Stiller technically qualifies!) or frequent hosts, so they don't feel all that out of place to me. And McCarthy's first Spicer sketch was an all-time great.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Eagle-eared listeners may have noticed that Darrell Hammond mistakenly referred to the host of this week's episode as "John Mulvaney" on not one but two separate occasions during the intro, which I'm sure excited our favorite customer service rep who definitely really exists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Saturday Night Live
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:02 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
I always fast forward through the opening credits, I had no idea he was currently the announcer. He really does know how to wring every remaining drop out of his employment there, doesn't he


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection