The Fountain (Darren Aronofsky, 2006)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
solaris72
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

#26 Post by solaris72 » Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:46 pm

The release date has been moved to a more Oscar-targeted Nov. 22nd and the release has been inflated from 1200 screens to 2500.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

#27 Post by Matt » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:14 pm

solaris72 wrote:The release date has been moved to a more Oscar-targeted Nov. 22nd and the release has been inflated from 1200 screens to 2500.
Just look what internet buzz can buy you these days.

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#28 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:58 pm

This looks incredible in every meaning of the word. My prediction is that it'll be a huge hit with the critics, but it'll do lukewarm in theaters. There are not many films I can think of that are sci-fi/drama that were successful in the B.O. except Close Encounters, E.T., and maybe Starman? (please correct if I'm wrong). That said, I really hope to catch this in the theater. It seems to demand the kind of attention one gets seeing it on the big screen, rather than watching it at home.

One more thing, wtf is with the R rating?

User avatar
miless
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:45 pm

#29 Post by miless » Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:45 am

flyonthewall2983 wrote:There are not many films I can think of that are sci-fi/drama that were successful in the B.O. except Close Encounters, E.T., and maybe Starman? (please correct if I'm wrong).
2001: A Space Odyssey is the one that comes to mind for me (it was one of the top grossing MGM films of all time)... but The Fountain is not just sci-fi but also present day medical drama and conquistador epic

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#30 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:08 am

Hmm, I thought 2001's initial business was very slow.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#31 Post by Antoine Doinel » Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:00 am

Maybe, but it ended up grossing over $50 million domestically and $190 million worldwide.

As for sci-fi films that have been a hit: The Matrix trilogy comes to mind immediately. Terminator films as well. The Back To The Future trilogy. Contact did very well. But like any genre film, I could probably easily list a bunch of films that bombed as well.

A 2500 screen opening is a big gamble but clearly the studio is going to be ramping up the promotion and feels the film can strike a chord with a large audience.

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#32 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:05 am

Antoine Doinel wrote:Maybe, but it ended up grossing over $50 million domestically and $190 million worldwide.

As for sci-fi films that have been a hit: The Matrix trilogy comes to mind immediately. Terminator films as well. The Back To The Future trilogy. Contact did very well. But like any genre film, I could probably easily list a bunch of films that bombed as well.

A 2500 screen opening is a big gamble but clearly the studio is going to be ramping up the promotion and feels the film can strike a chord with a large audience.
Well, of course those films were hits. The sci-fi/action genre will pretty much be a safe bet for hit movies (of course there are exceptions though). What I meant though were the sci-fi films that with character as much as hardware.

Not to say that those films mentioned above didn't. I'm just saying overall that I don't think The Fountain will do great business, but I'll gladly eat my words if I'm wrong.[/code]
Last edited by flyonthewall2983 on Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#33 Post by Fletch F. Fletch » Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:08 am

flyonthewall2983 wrote:
Antoine Doinel wrote:Maybe, but it ended up grossing over $50 million domestically and $190 million worldwide.

As for sci-fi films that have been a hit: The Matrix trilogy comes to mind immediately. Terminator films as well. The Back To The Future trilogy. Contact did very well. But like any genre film, I could probably easily list a bunch of films that bombed as well.

A 2500 screen opening is a big gamble but clearly the studio is going to be ramping up the promotion and feels the film can strike a chord with a large audience.
Well, of course those films were hits. The sci-fi/action genre will pretty much be a safe bet for hit movies (of course there are exceptions though). What I meant though were the sci-fi films that deal more with character than hardware.
12 Monkeys was quite successful if memory serves and that tried to be a more serious SF film.

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#34 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:10 am

ok, ok, my point sucks :P

Grimfarrow
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Hong Kong

#35 Post by Grimfarrow » Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:13 pm

Good, it's in competition.

User avatar
Lino
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:18 am
Location: Sitting End
Contact:

#36 Post by Lino » Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:18 pm

The only thing that keeps baffling me is the running time of this beast. Only 96 minutes long? How on earth can you go from year 1500 to 2500 in little over and hour and a half? Jokes aside, I do hope the final product is able to handle such megalomaniac aspirations.

rs98762001
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:04 pm

#37 Post by rs98762001 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:05 pm

According to VARIETY, this one premiered to a symphony of boos.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

#38 Post by Matt » Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:19 am

rs98762001 wrote:According to VARIETY, this one premiered to a symphony of boos.
That can only mean that it's absolutely fantastic.

User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

#39 Post by kinjitsu » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:01 am

To save everyone the trouble, here is the Variety review.

Some highlights:
Leslie Felperin wrote:Backburnered four years ago after original star Brad Pitt pulled out, then long in the making, "The Fountain," third feature by one-time wunderkind Darren Aronofsky ("Pi," "Requiem for a Dream"), made more of a splatter than a splash on Venice's Lido with its world premiere. Greeted by booing at its first press unspooling, pic's hippy trippy space odyssey-meets-contempo-weepy-meets-conquistador caper starring Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz suffers from a turgid script and bears all the signs of edit-suite triage to produce a still-incoherent 95 minutes. A gush of negative word of mouth will keep B.O. figures at a trickle.

Visual effects, credited to a slew of different companies, are indeed striking with their nearly 3-D layers of golden haze. However, segment ultimately looks like a remake of the wormhole section of "2001: A Space Odyssey," as produced by makers of instructional videos for beginning yoga students.

No doubt the filmmakers' intention was to celebrate a love that transcends centuries, hence repeated use of lines, scenes and motifs. In the end, however, the effect is just monotonous, especially given overuse of Clint Mansell's mournful orchestral score, slathered over scenes as if in hopes it will paper over the plot's cracks.

Nevertheless, with savvy marketing "The Fountain" might yet find a niche audience, especially with softer-hearted femme viewers who will groove to the pick's rich costumes and honeyed tones.
A dear old friend of mine is in the film, so I'll try to touch base with him and maybe get an inside scoop.

soma
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Melbourne

#40 Post by soma » Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:25 am

Fuck Variety. This is Aronofsky people... and will be genius. Can't wait!

By the way, a review has just been posted over at AICN. You can check it out here if you like. I don't recommend reading it if you don't want spoilers, but a couple of choice quotes are:

"Not many films can blow your mind and break your heart at the same time, but this one will."

"It's a lesson for me. A thrilling one. Because whatever I thought THE FOUNTAIN would be, it wasn't. Whatever I'd read and seen, the movie that Aronofsky made is so much more."

"The movie just sort of rattles around inside me, no matter what else I watch. I see an average of three movies a day right now, and this one ends up being the one I think about every night. And part of what I find so seductive about it is just how simple it is, but how complex it appears."

User avatar
The Invunche
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:43 am
Location: Denmark

#41 Post by The Invunche » Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:26 am

I's not like AICN has better credibility than Variety.

EDIT: and Moriarty is an all-time douche.

User avatar
Andre Jurieu
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:38 pm
Location: Back in Milan (Ind.)

#42 Post by Andre Jurieu » Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:42 am

Dear lord. Now we're using AICN to refute Variety. The day I take either Variety or AICN seriously and start valuing their opinions on films I want someone to shoot me right through the grey matter.

User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#43 Post by Fletch F. Fletch » Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:30 pm

The Independent sounds off on the negative reaction to the film and briefly mentions a sex scene that was cut out.

User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

#44 Post by kinjitsu » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:30 pm

Andre Jurieu wrote:Now we're using AICN to refute Variety.
Obviously to some, they are irrefutable sources of the truth.

User avatar
The Invunche
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:43 am
Location: Denmark

#45 Post by The Invunche » Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:59 pm

Anyone who names his son "Toshiro Lucas McWeeny" should not be trusted.
Toshiro Mifune turns in his grave. George Lucas looks to the ground...

User avatar
blindside8zao
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:31 pm
Location: Greensboro, NC

#46 Post by blindside8zao » Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:05 pm

One time this guy told me that Aronofsky could be the next Kubrick.

User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 3:59 pm

#47 Post by Barmy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:07 pm

Oh Jesus Christ someone is posting crap from AICN? I didn't read it but I bet they thought Fountain was "awesome!"

Variety is probably the best single source for reviews.

The Hollywood Reporter is dismissive.

rs98762001
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:04 pm

#48 Post by rs98762001 » Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:37 pm

soma wrote:Fuck Variety. This is Aronofsky people... and will be genius. Can't wait!
Genius? Based on what? The mediocre PI and heavy-handed, overwrought REQUIEM?

THE FOUNTAIN sounded like a disaster from the outset and the early reaction seems to bear this out. Thankfully this guy didn't get to bludgeon WATCHMEN to death.

User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 3:59 pm

#49 Post by Barmy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 6:30 pm

Handing "boy wonders" a bunch of "stars" and $$$ isn't necessarily a good thing. Big-themed movies are VERY hard to pull off, yet everybody wants to do them. Just because you are a good cameraman doesn't suddenly make you a philosopher. I will go see this but it sounds dire.

P.S. I give the Darren/Rachel "relationship" about 6 more months, at best.

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#50 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:10 pm

Barmy wrote:P.S. I give the Darren/Rachel "relationship" about 6 more months, at best.
Yeah, wrecking your girlfriend's career isn't exactly the most endearing thing a guy can do.

Post Reply