Eastern Promises (David Cronenberg, 2007)
Eastern Promises (David Cronenberg, 2007)
"Eastern Promisesfollows the mysterious and ruthless Nikolai (Viggo Mortensen), who is tied to one of London's most notorious organized crime families. His carefully maintained existence is jarred when he crosses paths with Anna (Naomi Watts), an innocent midwife trying to right a wrong, who accidentally uncovers potential evidence again the family. Now Nikolai must put into motion a harrowing chain of murder, deceit, and retribution."
I just noticed on IMDB that this film entered post-production and will apparently premiere at the Toronto Film festival in September. Not a lot of information yet but the cast looks promising, looking forward to this one.
I just noticed on IMDB that this film entered post-production and will apparently premiere at the Toronto Film festival in September. Not a lot of information yet but the cast looks promising, looking forward to this one.
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm
- Gropius
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:47 pm
This sounds like a relatively workmanlike project, and the one listed after it on IMDB (Maps to the Stars) even more so (a 'Hollywood-themed comedy' with a script by the author of Nightmare on Elm Street 3).
Cronenberg hasn't written an original script himself since eXistenZ. Even the earlier Burroughs and Ballard adaptations had Cronenberg-penned screenplays. Why this departure from auteurism? Can we expect a return to something more interesting before he retires?
Cronenberg hasn't written an original script himself since eXistenZ. Even the earlier Burroughs and Ballard adaptations had Cronenberg-penned screenplays. Why this departure from auteurism? Can we expect a return to something more interesting before he retires?
-
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:04 pm
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
I think a director can choose projects written by others that fall into their interests just as well as they can write those projectsGropius wrote:This sounds like a relatively workmanlike project, and the one listed after it on IMDB (Maps to the Stars) even more so (a 'Hollywood-themed comedy' with a script by the author of Nightmare on Elm Street 3).
Cronenberg hasn't written an original script himself since eXistenZ. Even the earlier Burroughs and Ballard adaptations had Cronenberg-penned screenplays. Why this departure from auteurism? Can we expect a return to something more interesting before he retires?
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm
Writing credits for recent Cronenberg films are very deceptive. He takes no screen credit for it, but the original screenplays for Spider and A History of Violence were completely overhauled by their respective writers in close collaboration with Cronenberg. I remember recently reading or seeing an interview with him in which he talked about how he will probably do another original screenplay soon, but for now he is interested in working his obsessions into already existing frameworks. It's actually a very Cronenbergian project, if you think about it.
- Len
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:48 pm
- Location: Finland
I'm absolutely thrilled about this. History Of Violence is very nearly my favorite Cronenberg (Dead Ringers is a bit more impressive and as a film I appreciate it more, but it's not exactly as entertaining as Violence) and obviously the cast is really promising.
And I love Cronenberg's approach into scripts he hasn't written, the way he makes them so unmistakeably his in the end. If the end results are stuff like Spider and History Of Violence, I'm perfectly happy with him pursuing more projects like these.
And I love Cronenberg's approach into scripts he hasn't written, the way he makes them so unmistakeably his in the end. If the end results are stuff like Spider and History Of Violence, I'm perfectly happy with him pursuing more projects like these.
- dadaistnun
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:31 am
- blindside8zao
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:31 pm
- Location: Greensboro, NC
- Gropius
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:47 pm
On the flimsy basis of those 10 seconds, I remain sceptical. It may be up to the standard of A History of Violence, perhaps even slightly better, but it still seems too generic to be 'classic' Cronenberg.Hai2u wrote:Here is a tiny trailer...it's at 00:50.
I really hope he turns out something to rival Videodrome or Naked Lunch (or even eXistenZ) during the remainder of his career.
- Rsdio
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 11:42 am
- Location: UK
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- exte
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:27 pm
- Location: NJ
- Via_Chicago
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:03 pm
I agree. The trailer actually managed to lessen my excitement in the film (which isn't to say I'm no longer excited to see the film), if that was even possible. Still psyched to see this though.exte wrote:I can't believe a diary is a plot device, but obviously Cronenberg knows what he's doing. It's not just about the diary, of course, but the trailer sure does lay everything out, huh? I'm sorry I saw it, actually. Better to go in cold to a Cronenberg film...
-
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:25 am
- Contact:
-
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:27 am
What!?!??!?!? I @#^&ing love the trailers to Videodrome and Naked Lunch. In fact, they are probably two of my favorites of all time.Matt wrote:Trailers for Cronenberg's films are almost always awful. I take that as a good sign, that the movie cannot be distilled into two minutes of "exciting shots" and "ominous voiceover."
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
One of the reasons why I like Dead Ringers so much could be illustrated by two different TV listings magazines I read, one of which described the plot of the film and gave it one star calling it exploitative, and the other which gave it five stars focusing on the way the gynecological and twins sharing a woman themes were handled with depth and sensitivity. Just describing the plot often can't fully describe the sensibility behind a film. Of how successfully a film deals with promising material, or how terrible sounding premises can become great films in the right hands (and vice versa!).Matt wrote:Trailers for Cronenberg's films are almost always awful. I take that as a good sign, that the movie cannot be distilled into two minutes of "exciting shots" and "ominous voiceover."
The same applies with trailers - condensed into a short time they work on action, spectacle and huge emotions (people shouting, arguing, kissing, having fights) out of context. They might be interesting but they still say little about the film itself, about where scenes shown come in the film. They can't deal with some of the most exciting elements of cinema - slow, building scenes; intense dialogue sequences; even the techniques of cinema as zooms, tracking shots, long takes don't come through in a trailer which involves editing patterns relatable more to other trailers than the film itself because of the short time which they have to work in (and of course often use music cues not used in the film for greater impact in the trailer!).
This might be responsible for the trend away from narrative in modern cinema. Special effects films are easier to sell because the pleasures of narrative films cannot be quickly conveyed in an exciting and innovative manner. After all Transformers, Spiderman or Pirates of the Caribbean will be different from the trailer in their full forms, but most of their pleasures are immediately apparent from the trailers - the spectacle is right there and the audience is led to believe that if they see the film itself they'll get even more of the same (though this is supposing that not all of the best and most spectacular scenes were used in the trailer!).
Anyway, I'll take the advice above and not look at the trailer - there's no way I'd be skipping a new Cronenberg film whether I saw it or not!
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
You should read the reviews for his Crash on the Flixster part of Facebook, they're hilarious. Most of the negative reviews came from people who it was that "other" Crash, and they go on about how repulsed they were by the sexuality in the film.colinr0380 wrote:One of the reasons why I like Dead Ringers so much could be illustrated by two different TV listings magazines I read, one of which described the plot of the film and gave it one star calling it exploitative, and the other which gave it five stars focusing on the way the gynecological and twins sharing a woman themes were handled with depth and sensitivity.
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm
Oh, I love that people are seeing the "wrong" movie. I bet in circumstances like these, Cronenberg couldn't be more pleased that his film shares a title with a notorious piece of Oscar pabulum.flyonthewall2983 wrote:You should read the reviews for his Crash on the Flixster part of Facebook, they're hilarious. Most of the negative reviews came from people who it was that "other" Crash, and they go on about how repulsed they were by the sexuality in the film.