The Jeffrey Wells Thread

A subforum to discuss film culture and criticism.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#201 Post by FrauBlucher » Wed Mar 18, 2015 6:50 pm

He probably got bombarded from people who suffer clinical depression and others in the mental health field. I didn't read article and usually don't read much of his writings but from the little excerpts you guys wrote I ain't missing much.

Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#202 Post by Perkins Cobb » Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:22 pm

Well, here's a cache of it, which didn't come up when I checked a few hours ago. Rejoice, you can eyeroll at his bullshit without giving him a click!

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#203 Post by Gregory » Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:17 am

I didn't have time to finish the piece earlier, but the end pays off richly.
He says on his site that he loves pancakes — that indicates that he eats whatever the fuck he wants to eat, and that he probably has other appetites that are doing him no good.
THE END

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#204 Post by domino harvey » Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:53 am

I'm surprised Wells didn't off himself when that director failed to send him Vinessa Shaw nude pix. He's been through the worst lack and loss imaginable and survived, what an inspiration I cry every time share this if you believe in the healing power of JW praise him!!!!!!

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#205 Post by FrauBlucher » Thu Mar 19, 2015 7:26 am

Perkins Cobb wrote:Well, here's a cache of it, which didn't come up when I checked a few hours ago. Rejoice, you can eyeroll at his bullshit without giving him a click!
He's audacious and clueless at the same time.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#206 Post by colinr0380 » Thu Mar 19, 2015 8:13 am

That is quite shockingly silly piece by Wells. So if you drink, smoke and eat junk food, and don't do yoga or lift weights it is your own fault that you are depressed?

And the 'its your own fault' approach to drinking is terribly wrong-headed, but I cannot entirely blame Wells for this it often seems to happen that people treat the 'easy' superficial symptom of being depressed, upset or finding no joy in life (drinking, smoking, drugs, whatever) as a cause instead. Perhaps it is just easier to try and stamp out the symptom, and to make individuals feel guilty for having indulged in it, than to tackle the, perhaps impossible to change, root causes that drive people into despair in the first place, or to a place where they want to lose themselves as the only release?

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#207 Post by tenia » Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:28 am

I've just read the Wells article, and it seemed so so so wrong. I don't know what would be worse : that Wells actually believe what he has written, or that he wanted to mean something else and that's all he ended up being able to write.

I totally agree with Colin : it seems amazing that Wells is able to think so narrow-minded things which looks like stuff from 50 years ago ("oooh, you drink too much, no wonder you're depressed").

There is so little empathy in this piece that I understand how Wells would simply take it down because there's no way you can rewrite something like this properly.

User avatar
copen
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 5:43 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#208 Post by copen » Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:55 pm

Gregory wrote:Question about Broadcast News below;
Jeffrey Wells wrote:Albert Brooks‘ character voiced the first in Broadcast News: “Always choose a woman who’s just hot enough to turn you on.”
I Googled a few variations of this "well-known quote" to double-check and found nothing....

albert brooks' character says something very close to this in 'defending your life'. he elaborates that his wife was much too good looking for him (inferiority).

User avatar
med
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:58 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#209 Post by med » Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:02 pm

domino harvey wrote:I'm surprised Wells didn't off himself when that director failed to send him Vinessa Shaw nude pix.
I'm fairly certain "breaking up with a girlfriend who was astonishing in bed" was code language for not getting Vinessa Shaw nudes.

User avatar
copen
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 5:43 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#210 Post by copen » Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:30 pm

i've never heard of this guy until today. thank you(?) criterion forum.
i tried to read several entries on his blog, but they weren't able to hold my attention.

User avatar
ianthemovie
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:51 am
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#211 Post by ianthemovie » Mon Sep 21, 2015 12:10 pm

Does anybody know at what point Glenn Kenny gave up bothering to be nice to Jeff Wells? I ask because Kenny's Twitter feed would indicate that he, along with most of the rest of the critics' community, has basically has lost all respect for the guy, but I've been listening to Kenny's conversations with Wells from 2012 (recorded for Wells' podcast) and Kenny is totally respectful and generous. They're not exactly chummy, and you can occasionally feel Kenny bristle against Wells during the conversations, but the mere fact that Kenny was once willing to engage with Wells for several hours' worth of conversation about movies suggests that the nature of their relationship has changed dramatically in the last several years. I just wondered which of Wells' faux pas was the one that made Kenny realize Wells wasn't worth his time.

Those conversations, by the way, are completely fascinating for Kenny fans. I could listen to the man talk about movies all day. He has a few verbal tics (like saying "you know" constantly) but he's totally sharp, articulate, and hugely knowledgeable. In the interviews with Wells he goes into depth on most of the big end-of-the-year films, including Django, Amour, Lincoln, etc., as well as discusses the neo-liberal backlash against Zero Dark Thirty, the Criterion Blu-ray of On the Waterfront, the Oscar race, and many other topics. If you can manage to ignore the Wells half of the conversation, it's riveting stuff. Somebody needs to talk him into having his own podcast. I was a fan of the now-defunct Village Voice film podcast but good God, Kenny would be able to talk circles around those guys, to say nothing of the guys from /Film.

User avatar
bdsweeney
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:09 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#212 Post by bdsweeney » Mon Sep 21, 2015 6:57 pm

ianthemovie wrote:Those conversations, by the way, are completely fascinating for Kenny fans. I could listen to the man talk about movies all day. Somebody needs to talk him into having his own podcast. I was a fan of the now-defunct Village Voice film podcast but good God, Kenny would be able to talk circles around those guys, to say nothing of the guys from /Film.
I have no idea if they're available anymore, but see if you can track down his conversations on (now defunct) 'The Film Talk' podcast. All three contributors were erudite and it made for a terrific listen.

criterion10

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#213 Post by criterion10 » Thu Nov 26, 2015 1:48 am


User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#214 Post by tenia » Thu Nov 26, 2015 5:10 am

I love the title of his answer.
When will people learn not to throw gasoline on the fire and instead focus on discussing the matter which has been tackled ?

I remember when Telerama's French journalist Aurelien Ferenczi negative review of Wall E was deemed as vastly missing the whole point of the movie, focusing instead on irrelevant points (like the movie not respecting Asimov laws of robotics, which would be like bashing Asterix for not respecting La guerre des Gaules). He responded to that by a post titled "Are we allowed to criticize Wall E ?" which actually simply was a compilation of posts made by users on his original review. :roll:

But hey, in the case of Wells, he saw that with a female friend ! So he knows what he's talking about based on this wildly representative sample of 1 woman ! Plus, another woman said it was "brutal"!


Joke aside, it's amazing he doesn't realise he's using a compellingly bad argument to make his case. Because a guy say his wife wouldn't last 5 minutes doesn't mean a thing... except what he said. My GF hates SF movies, would I write based on this for the upcoming Star Wars movies "Forget women seeing this" ?

He's extrapolating to the last degree things to justify having written an overly-simplistic generalisation.
And end up his answer with a Godwin point.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#215 Post by Gregory » Thu Nov 26, 2015 5:57 pm

Wells to Iñárritu:
Happy Thanksgiving to your and yours, but I need to share a thought or two about the hoo-hah of the last two days. You’ll forgive me but I’m feeling a certain kinship today with Hugh Glass. Well, somewhat. Let me explain...
The only similarity I see between Hugh Glass and Wells is that he's a Hugh Jass.

The comment that sparked this was stupid but wouldn't elicit any more than a shrug from me, but what's really pathetic is his using a weak mea culpa to repeatedly cast himself as a bloodied soldier in some kind of culture war, and something akin to a victim of an oppressive dictatorship, just because some people on social media disagreed with his statement and then the Guardian smelled a trivial controversy and picked it up.

Wells continues talking about what a favor he's done for the film through the courageous stand he's taken in the face of the vicious "predators."
...Now it’s suddenly a hot-button film that is demanding everyone’s attention — certainly the attention of your somewhat younger, Twitter-savvy militants.

Yes, I’m feeling wounded on this Thanksgiving Day. I have been bitten and torn and bloodied by an army of twitter dogs. But because of this The Revenant is now in a slightly better place. Tell me I’m deluded.

All hail the spirit of The Revenant — honor your life and your beating heart by insisting on survival to the very last breath.”
Happy to oblige: you're extremely deluded.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#216 Post by mfunk9786 » Sun Mar 13, 2016 3:19 pm

Image

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#217 Post by domino harvey » Sun Mar 13, 2016 3:48 pm

A+

User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:38 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#218 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin » Sun Mar 13, 2016 3:56 pm

Wells wants to see someone naturally exuding the real thing. I invite you all to take that sentence out of context for a moment.


User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#220 Post by tenia » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:48 am

Wells also reminds us kindly that he has "judged no female performances based in their weight. Not once."
Of course, "Appatow Funny-Chubby Community's New Member" might disagree (and I forgot about Jennifer Lawrence being "a fairly tall, big-boned lady" and thus "too big" to be a love interest in The Hunger Games.

User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:25 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#221 Post by EddieLarkin » Wed Apr 20, 2016 1:10 pm

Wells says it's tragic that the new One-Eyed Jacks restoration will be in 1.85:1 instead of the full VistaVision neg ratio of 1.5:1 (and so presumably feels this way about all VistaVision productions?). Much of the extra visual information he desires would of course have never made it to release prints at the time.

User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#222 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian » Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:06 pm

For a time, Wells seemed to believe that any flat widescreen film made before the mid-to-late '60s should be presented in full frame. He offered various justifications, typically some combination of a) filmmakers needed time (roughly a decade, apparently) to properly adjust to widescreen framing, so the films look better with open mattes; b) filmmakers knew that people would eventually watch these films on TV and subconsciously framed for 4:3; and c) headroom is good. He's since realized this is a futile crusade and now pushes for 1.66:1, regardless of how the film was projected at the time or even the director's stated preference—for instance, he complained to Peter Becker about Richard Lester's decision to present A Hard Day's Night at 1.75:1.

User avatar
Alphonse Tram
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:32 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#223 Post by Alphonse Tram » Mon May 23, 2016 2:06 am

Image

calculus entrophy
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:32 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#224 Post by calculus entrophy » Mon May 23, 2016 10:38 am

Jiminy Glick has nothing on wellshwad

User avatar
Dead or Deader
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 12:47 am

Re: The Jeffrey Wells Thread

#225 Post by Dead or Deader » Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:39 pm

Holy shit...


Wells is now at David Thomson level of creepiness, with the added bonus of good Lesbian stereotyping.

Post Reply