John Wick Franchise (Chad Stahelski, 2014-2023)
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
John Wick Franchise (Chad Stahelski, 2014-2023)
Has anyone seen John Wick? I heard it's very good.
- PfR73
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:07 pm
Re: The Films of 2014
While still falling victim to some action movie cliches (he can hit every bad guy with one shot except the one he's really trying to kill, etc), it's a pretty fun, pretty tight romp. The action is well choreographed & shot, not falling victim to shakycam & hyperkinetic editing. Some fun supporting performances (although after watching 30 Rock, I cannot accept Dean Winters in the semi-serious role he has, imagining every line ending with "dummy"). There's a moment in the film where Reeves gives the most intense performance I've ever seen from him.flyonthewall2983 wrote:Has anyone seen John Wick? I heard it's very good.
- Drucker
- Your Future our Drucker
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am
Re: The Films of 2014
Or State Farm commercials.PfR73 wrote:, I cannot accept Dean Winters in the semi-serious role he has, imagining every line ending with "dummy").
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: The Films of 2014
He will always be Ryan O'Reily to me
- Grand Wazoo
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:23 pm
Re: The Films of 2014
Pretty much any actor from Oz will be that character in my mind forever. The idea that Verne Schillinger could get nominated for an Oscar is thrilling.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: The Films of 2014
I thought it dropped off in the 2nd half. A revenge film should be more satisfying when the biggest fish go down, but I found both of the most notable deaths rather anticlimactic in the way they were staged. Still a good film, just not a great one. A lot of fun.flyonthewall2983 wrote:Has anyone seen John Wick? I heard it's very good.
- Kellen
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:20 pm
- Location: missouri.
Re: The Films of 2014
I just got a chance to catch it today; I thought it was really fun. It was nice to see Keanu kicking some ass on the big screen again, I'm sure if I was in my high school days I would've loved it. It does slow down a bit towards the end but it was still enjoyable.flyonthewall2983 wrote:Has anyone seen John Wick? I heard it's very good.
- DarkImbecile
- Ask me about my visible cat breasts
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
I agree that it doesn't quite muster enough ingenuity and style to reach a level above "good for what it is"; I wish that the underground assassin economy/social structure had been more central to the main plot and less a kind of sideshow to the revenge action.
As funny as the relentless murdering became as it continued, it would actually have helped the action sequences to remove maybe 20-30 of Keanu's kills; the monotony of some of the shooting sequences undermines the terrific physical choreography and, as mfunk mentioned, limits the significance of the main villian's deaths.
edited for syntax
As funny as the relentless murdering became as it continued, it would actually have helped the action sequences to remove maybe 20-30 of Keanu's kills; the monotony of some of the shooting sequences undermines the terrific physical choreography and, as mfunk mentioned, limits the significance of the main villian's deaths.
edited for syntax
-
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:33 am
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
I liked the part where the Russian mob chief indicated he was going to chop up Mr. Peanuts M&M and sprinkle him on his ice-cream. Mr. Peanuts' double-take was classic.
- bdsweeney
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:09 pm
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
Well ... that mostly lived up to the hype. While I'm not much of an action film aficionado, I can still understand the pleasures to be had in well choreographed gunplay.
And while I've seen recently well reviewed films like Drug War and The Raid, they either felt too stagey or too similar to Mann's Heat (which I'm not all that fond of).
I found John Wick to be mostly enormously entertaining, spectacularly choreographed and knowingly hilarious.
I have to agree that the last half hour did bring a dip in its pleasures. Yes, the big bad guys were too easily dispatched and it undercut the enjoyment by asking us to take evil seriously with Defoe's outcome. Also, the shots of the women in the bath house weren't necessary.
But overall a lot of fun.
Just one question: how did Wick make the cars explode by clicking the remote button? Did I miss something?
And while I've seen recently well reviewed films like Drug War and The Raid, they either felt too stagey or too similar to Mann's Heat (which I'm not all that fond of).
I found John Wick to be mostly enormously entertaining, spectacularly choreographed and knowingly hilarious.
I have to agree that the last half hour did bring a dip in its pleasures. Yes, the big bad guys were too easily dispatched and it undercut the enjoyment by asking us to take evil seriously with Defoe's outcome. Also, the shots of the women in the bath house weren't necessary.
But overall a lot of fun.
Just one question: how did Wick make the cars explode by clicking the remote button? Did I miss something?
- warren oates
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:16 pm
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
I pretty much agree with DarkImbecile. The economy of exposition and the imaginative world-building was what made this film really stand out for me and I wished both had been pushed further. I also enjoyed the way that even some of the minor characters had surprisingly decent and not necessarily obvious arcs. Peter Labuza's podcast The Cinephiliacs -- well worth listening to in general -- was what made me want to seek out this film, as he talked it up in his 2014 year end wrap-up. In addition to praising the film for trusting the viewers with its comparatively terse exposition, he noted the shoot-outs' relative fidelity to bullet counts, to squibbing exit wounds, to representing ricochets and following the ultimate trajectories of through-and-through bullets.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
Soderbergh already showed us how alien fight sequences appear when filmed objectively in Haywire, and while it was an interesting experiment, it didn't need to be revisited, especially not by a film with far less going for it like this. This is an empty and useless collection of video game sequences, with the gunplay too fast and weirdly maneuvered into an uncanny valley of violence, replete with CGI blood everywhere. Things often happen quickly in the film, but rarely are they exciting or engaging or of any interest. It's literally like watching someone else play a video game (the characters exchange gold tokens, for Christ's sake), and about as entertaining. There's a fine collection of supporting actors here who show up for a day or two's work, but this is an artless, digitally-overmanipulated, and soulless endeavor that is patently ridiculous in every sense and yet takes itself stone-face serious. This kills any potential enjoyment to be gained from the whole endeavor. I think it's telling that Willem Dafoe is briefly on hand, because this film's inability to understand what makes a Tarantino film work and its hyper-violence and bizarrely underrealized criminal underground "world building" shares much in common with the Boondock Saints, and that both films now have rabid cult audiences of eternal teenagers is sadly not surprising. John Wick is the ultimate juvenile film experience, empty and flashy and self-important in ways it never earns. It may have been goofy fun on paper, but the filmed execution is not merciful.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
- Luke M
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:21 pm
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
I enjoyed the first one but the sequel didn't add much other than the additional bullet fodder. When you're seeing these films you sort of go in forgiving character development, coherent plotlines, and clever dialogue in exchange for spectacular action sequences -and they failed to deliver on that front.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: The John Wick Films (Chad Stahelski, 2014/2017)
I disagree wholeheartedly. Thought the second film was a substantial improvement over the first, with some of the best violence choreography since Kill Bill: Vol. 1. It feels so much more confident, so much more settled - and the casting (Common, especially) works better than some of the choices in the first film. I can't wait to see it again, and I can't believe I'm saying that.
- DarkImbecile
- Ask me about my visible cat breasts
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
That's what I wrote two and a half years ago about the original, and both issues I noted were addressed in the superior second film, just in different directions. On the one hand, John Wick: Chapter 2 played up the assassin shadow world and made its rules and machinations even more central to the plot, to the film's benefitDarkImbecile wrote:I agree that it doesn't quite muster enough ingenuity and style to reach a level above "good for what it is"; I wish that the underground assassin economy/social structure had been more central to the main plot and less a kind of sideshow to the revenge action.
As funny as the relentless murdering became as it continued, it would actually have helped the action sequences to remove maybe 20-30 of Keanu's kills; the monotony of some of the shooting sequences undermines the terrific physical choreography and, as mfunk mentioned, limits the significance of the main villian's deaths.
SpoilerShow
(as with the very entertaining introduction of Laurence Fishburne's army of "homeless" lookouts and spies and the paranoia-fostering ubiquity of assassins in the final scenes).
On the other hand, the monotonous, almost metronomic sequences of Wick mowing down EVEN MORE dozens of men with shotguns, assault rifles, and handguns were the closest any film I've seen has come to the repetitious killing sprees of a video game - even more so than those movies that explicitly tried to replicate that experience. The choreography in these sequences makes them tolerable at worst, but they also make the action sequences doing something different stand out,
SpoilerShow
as with the subway fight with Common, the pencil scene, etc.
As an anecdotal aside, in my experience the difference between those fans of this type of movie who find these films "fine, but not much more" and those who really enjoy them are that the latter haven't seen The Raid or its sequel, which are the apotheosis of this type of action film, as far as I'm concerned.
-
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:31 am
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
DarkImbecile wrote:DarkImbecile wrote: On the other hand, the monotonous, almost metronomic sequences of Wick mowing down EVEN MORE dozens of men with shotguns, assault rifles, and handguns were the closest any film I've seen has come to the repetitious killing sprees of a video game - even more so than those movies that explicitly tried to replicate that experience.
Have you seen the numbing, exhausting Hardcore Henry?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: The John Wick Films (Chad Stahelski, 2014/2017)
This thread is helpful for cementing what films to avoid in the future
- DarkImbecile
- Ask me about my visible cat breasts
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: John Wick (David Leitch and Chad Stahelski, 2014)
Just enough to know not to watch any more of it.beamish13 wrote:Have you seen the numbing, exhausting Hardcore Henry?DarkImbecile wrote:DarkImbecile wrote: On the other hand, the monotonous, almost metronomic sequences of Wick mowing down EVEN MORE dozens of men with shotguns, assault rifles, and handguns were the closest any film I've seen has come to the repetitious killing sprees of a video game - even more so than those movies that explicitly tried to replicate that experience.
- Luke M
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:21 pm
Re: The John Wick Films (Chad Stahelski, 2014/2017)
I think I'd call the choreography tolerable at best. Though the real painful part were all the jump cuts. Additionally, the slow-mos whenever characters crash through glass would've been better if it was meant to be an homage to cheesy 80s/90s action flicks. The film gave me a greater appreciation for John Woo and Michael Mann's shoot 'em ups.
- TheDudeAbides
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:57 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: The John Wick Films (Chad Stahelski, 2014/2017)
I agree completely. John Wick 2 was, for me, the best action film I've seen since Kill Bill: Vol. 1 just narrowly beating out The Raid films which I also loved. The choreography in the violence scenes were perfect, Reeves and his counter parts really took the fight scenes seriously, allowing for a lack of cutting during the fight scenes and a very authentic feel.mfunk9786 wrote:I disagree wholeheartedly. Thought the second film was a substantial improvement over the first, with some of the best violence choreography since Kill Bill: Vol. 1. It feels so much more confident, so much more settled - and the casting (Common, especially) works better than some of the choices in the first film. I can't wait to see it again, and I can't believe I'm saying that.
This is also probably the most fun movie I've seen in a long, long time. I can't remember another theatre experience where the whole theatre is yelling "ohhhh" "whoa" and "yes!" for almost the entire film. The dialogue and the story are pure cheeseball, but it felt utterly perfect for this film. The dialogue was very laughable but in a fun way, it seemed like a joke the filmmakers and Reeves were in on.
Common was great, probably delivering the strongest performance of the film and giving us some great fight scenes; I hope they bring him back for John Wick 3
SpoilerShow
even though John Wick stabbed him in the heart
I also can't wait to see it again - it is a blast
- Being
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 5:23 pm
Re: The John Wick Films (Chad Stahelski, 2014/2017)
I was completely unaware of these films until about a week ago, when someone mentioned that John Wick 2 was worth checking out. I sat down and watched the first film and enjoyed it, then saw John Wick 2 at the cinema and, again, enjoyed it. These films are kept simple in their premise, but they deliver bigtime on action, unlike so many Hollywood films, which try to pretend to be something they are not, and then under-deliver on the action.
Apparently these films were directed by working stuntmen, which explains why the stunts and action scenes are so cracking. If you keep your expectations within reasonable boundaries, I think you can enjoy these films as a fun action vehicle.
Apparently these films were directed by working stuntmen, which explains why the stunts and action scenes are so cracking. If you keep your expectations within reasonable boundaries, I think you can enjoy these films as a fun action vehicle.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- jbeall
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Atlanta-ish
Re: John Wick Franchise (Chad Stahelski/David Leitch, 2014-?
I agree with the plaudits for Chapter 2. The gunplay choreography was a bit cleaner, and there was a bit more world-building that, while unrealistic, makes perfect sense for this franchise. I probably won't see it a second time, but it was a great technical exercise in pure action choreography.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA