yes, I've read that.swo17 wrote:Oedipax wrote:It's made up of shots that worked best in the new aspect ratio
But it doesn't clarify if the final image of those shots is cropped from the previous aspect ratio, or if it expands on the sides.
yes, I've read that.swo17 wrote:Oedipax wrote:It's made up of shots that worked best in the new aspect ratio
I would guess the gains on the sides will be marginal, and the 'loss' of the top/bottom to be most of where the extra width comes from. But they do mention doing a fresh scan of the elements at 11K resolution for this release, so they could have made sure the scan picked up every last bit of side information off the negative if it wasn't there already.Costa wrote:yes, I've read that.swo17 wrote:Oedipax wrote:It's made up of shots that worked best in the new aspect ratio
But it doesn't clarify if the final image of those shots is cropped from the previous aspect ratio, or if it expands on the sides.
I'll be sure to use this the next time I run out of things to say in a conversation. What a novel way to respond to a perfectly valid question!swo17 wrote:Who cares?
pzadvance wrote:All told, Voyage of Time probably has a handful of the most astonishing nature images I've ever seenSpoilerShow(POV hatching from an egg, the school of fish vs. the flock of seagulls, the seal feeding...)
Apparently that is Malick's preferred presentation as well and how he originally intended.J Adams wrote:WITHOUT narration is definitely preferred. The Pitt narration added nothing. Haven't seen/heard the Blanchett version, but would like to see it without narration.
Hardly discredits it as an "educational component" if that's what you're implying.J Adams wrote:Thanks. But the narration is of the "why do we exist" nature as opposed to the "this is a coral reef composed of living creatures, which feed on plankton" stuff. Glad he got away with Malickian narration.
This kind of snottiness is why I generally avoid this FORUM like the plague. I live in Manhattan and have access to innumerable more theatrical presentations than anyone who lives elsewhere. I simply, and blandly, expressed a preference for a particular approach to VoT.AK wrote:Well, you apparently know best.
J Adams wrote:This kind of snottiness
J Adams wrote:I live in Manhattan and have access to innumerable more theatrical presentations than anyone who lives elsewhere.