Star Wars: Original/Prequel Trilogies & General Thread
- denti alligator
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:36 pm
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
Re: Star Wars films
Actually the Special Edition of Empire is the least offensive.
I was thinking about Lucas's comment. It's very expensive to restore those originals. So why not let someone else pay for it? Whoever did it would recoup the cost times 10.
I was thinking about Lucas's comment. It's very expensive to restore those originals. So why not let someone else pay for it? Whoever did it would recoup the cost times 10.
- Saturnome
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 5:22 pm
Re: Star Wars films
That doesn't make sense. I wonder about the state of the prints, but I'm pretty sure even The Godfather's restauration paid off quickly (or you can correct me).
- Alphonse Doinel
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:42 pm
Re: Star Wars films
Lucas should be sent to therapy. It's understandable that he thinks the special editions are better. At least in his head. What is not understandable is that he doesn't want to give fans a choice. I assume he just doesn't want people owning the 'inferior' versions so they can eventually be erased from history.
Don't know if this article has been posted elsewhere, but its an interesting read.
Don't know if this article has been posted elsewhere, but its an interesting read.
- Svevan
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:49 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Star Wars films
ho-lee shit that would have been awesomeThe discussed ending of the film that Kurtz favored presented the rebel forces in tatters, Leia grappling with her new duties as queen and Luke walking off alone “like Clint Eastwood in the spaghetti westerns,” as Kurtz put it.
Also, Kurtz has an epic beard (and chin).
- Finch
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, UK
Re: Star Wars films
Never going to happen of course but Lucas would still not agree to a restoration of the untouched originals if the fans managed to collect enough money to finance a restoration. Lucas' contempt for his original vision is only surpassed by his contempt for those fans who only embrace that vision. This was never better demonstrated than in the reissue of the originals proper in a non-anarmorphic laserdisc port - talk about flipping the proverbial middle finger at your fans. This, to me, is far more enraging than the prequels, terrible though they are.
Anyhow, if they are genuinely ever going to sell the originals only in a bundle with that crap on Blu, I'm going to buy the 2007 DVD of Empire again.
Anyhow, if they are genuinely ever going to sell the originals only in a bundle with that crap on Blu, I'm going to buy the 2007 DVD of Empire again.
- Person
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm
Re: Star Wars films
Lucas' vision of his work is locked down, ie. THX-1138, American Graffiti, the Star Wars Saga. He spend a long time restoring and preserving the 35mm elements of his films and re-doing the special effects so in his mind, at least, the films as we have them on DVD are complete and the versions we had on Laserdisc are just that - the old, unfinished versions. But he should take a page out his buddy Steve's book and do a Close Encounters 3-version Blu-ray. But he probably feels he already did that with the non-anamorphic editions of Star Wars.
I asked a question here a few years ago about the condition of the camera negatives of ANH, ESB and ROTJ, ie. are the o-negs intact as they were in 1993 when the films were photo-chemically restored? That shouldbe the case. The 35mm elements should be in GREAT condition. I think that Lucas is bullshitting big-time. The Blu-rays will be 2007 versions - or even re-jigged further. Frankly, I'm not that bothered, personally, but I do want to own Graffiti on Blu. That's Lucas' best film and one of the best American films ever made, I feel.
I asked a question here a few years ago about the condition of the camera negatives of ANH, ESB and ROTJ, ie. are the o-negs intact as they were in 1993 when the films were photo-chemically restored? That shouldbe the case. The 35mm elements should be in GREAT condition. I think that Lucas is bullshitting big-time. The Blu-rays will be 2007 versions - or even re-jigged further. Frankly, I'm not that bothered, personally, but I do want to own Graffiti on Blu. That's Lucas' best film and one of the best American films ever made, I feel.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: Star Wars films
I agree with Person, Spielberg had the right approach with Close Encounters and later providing both the original and retouched versions of E.T. on DVD. It just seems like bloody mindedness on Lucas's part - he'd probably make a good deal of money on the original version of the trilogy but simply doesn't feel the need to issue it especially now when the more time that passes the bigger the deal the 'original' version becomes, so it becomes even more impossible to just quietly release it due to the implication by doing so that it might be a more satisfying version, or that the protests were somehow justified.
I don't really have an issue with someone retouching or re-editing their films after the fact, but once a film has been placed out there commercially and people have formed their own relationship with the film in one version then it is just a matter of courtesy to provide that original version along with whatever version is preferred.
Although I'm not the greatest fan of Star Wars I love THX-1138, and really find those same kinds of clunkily inserted CG 'wow!' sequences trying to expand the scope of this otherwise quite intimate story really unnecessary (especially as they work against the tone of the film where you have a split into thirds structure of a fractured love story, a blank prison story and an ironically truncated action/chase film sterilely dictated by the costs of capturing the fugitives. All the shots widening out the world with efficient banks of controllers at work, or fast moving trains, and especially the dumb 'dodging the traffic' section at the beginning of the car 'chase' sequence, totally undermine the stripped down raw power that the original scenes had). Luckily I've got an old television showing of the earlier version of that film, even in its original aspect ratio, but I'd be extremely happy if it ever turned up on a legitimate DVD or Blu release.
I don't really have an issue with someone retouching or re-editing their films after the fact, but once a film has been placed out there commercially and people have formed their own relationship with the film in one version then it is just a matter of courtesy to provide that original version along with whatever version is preferred.
Although I'm not the greatest fan of Star Wars I love THX-1138, and really find those same kinds of clunkily inserted CG 'wow!' sequences trying to expand the scope of this otherwise quite intimate story really unnecessary (especially as they work against the tone of the film where you have a split into thirds structure of a fractured love story, a blank prison story and an ironically truncated action/chase film sterilely dictated by the costs of capturing the fugitives. All the shots widening out the world with efficient banks of controllers at work, or fast moving trains, and especially the dumb 'dodging the traffic' section at the beginning of the car 'chase' sequence, totally undermine the stripped down raw power that the original scenes had). Luckily I've got an old television showing of the earlier version of that film, even in its original aspect ratio, but I'd be extremely happy if it ever turned up on a legitimate DVD or Blu release.
- Person
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm
Re: Star Wars films
Lucas is a gonk. If the original cuts of the 1977-83 films were released as a Blu-ray-only, then even Stevie Wonder (I hate Stevie Wonder quips yet I use them always) would shag ass to Sharper Image.
I'm watching my DVD-R of the 1977 cut now. Surprisingly watchable for a low-bitrate, 4:3 letterbox analogue transfer from back in the 90s (I love that phrase, "back in the 90s..." I contrived it in 1997 and couldn't wait to use it - sad!). Maybe it's the upscaling. The sound is AMAZING. A very enjoyable experience! It's weird how watching some old transfers is nostalgic and cozy, isn't it?! I envy you guys who have 15+ year old Lasers! Such quaint days, but so much effort was required to create an optimal transfer in the 80s and 90s.
Anyway, Porkins is told to "eject" in the 1977 film! Eject! In space? Without a spacesuit? Fucking wise up!
I'm watching my DVD-R of the 1977 cut now. Surprisingly watchable for a low-bitrate, 4:3 letterbox analogue transfer from back in the 90s (I love that phrase, "back in the 90s..." I contrived it in 1997 and couldn't wait to use it - sad!). Maybe it's the upscaling. The sound is AMAZING. A very enjoyable experience! It's weird how watching some old transfers is nostalgic and cozy, isn't it?! I envy you guys who have 15+ year old Lasers! Such quaint days, but so much effort was required to create an optimal transfer in the 80s and 90s.
Anyway, Porkins is told to "eject" in the 1977 film! Eject! In space? Without a spacesuit? Fucking wise up!
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Star Wars films
The really pissy thing is that (at least for the first two) you really can't call it his solitary vision as basically every new voice from the period had imput into those films. He's screwing with the vision of several artists. The last twenty years or so have turned him into a parody of David O. Selznick practically. At least I have my VHSs.Finch wrote: Lucas' contempt for his original vision is only surpassed by his contempt for those fans who only embrace that vision.
- Steven H
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: NC
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:39 pm
- Location: Lebanon, PA
Re: Star Wars films
Agreed.knives wrote:The really pissy thing is that (at least for the first two) you really can't call it his solitary vision as basically every new voice from the period had imput into those films. He's screwing with the vision of several artists. The last twenty years or so have turned him into a parody of David O. Selznick practically. At least I have my VHSs.Finch wrote: Lucas' contempt for his original vision is only surpassed by his contempt for those fans who only embrace that vision.
Last year I found the original trilogy in abox set at the library's annual sale. Burned 'em to DVD. They're non-anamorphic and pan & scan, as god meant them to be!
- jsteffe
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:00 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Star Wars Films
Aren't the theatrical cuts of the first Star Wars films available on the second discs of these sets?
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode ... B000FQJAIW
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode ... B000FQJAJG
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode ... B000FQVX78
If I recall correctly, they're 4:3 letterboxed and not anamorphic, though, since they use the same masters as the laserdiscs. I'd imagine they also look better than DVD-Rs of the laserdiscs.
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode ... B000FQJAIW
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode ... B000FQJAJG
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode ... B000FQVX78
If I recall correctly, they're 4:3 letterboxed and not anamorphic, though, since they use the same masters as the laserdiscs. I'd imagine they also look better than DVD-Rs of the laserdiscs.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Star Wars Films
I've got the Empire of that and they look all right on my tube teevee. It's not pristine or anything, but are in more than good condition.
- aox
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
- Location: nYc
Re: Star Wars Films
The only thing that is making me excited about this set (other than the films being in HD), is that hopefully he will include all of the deleted scenes from the original trilogy. A New Hope has something like 20-40 minutes of excised footage (though I think the other two films only have a scene or two) from what I have read. Even a dropped subplot from what I understand.
- Alphonse Doinel
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:42 pm
Re: Star Wars Films
The ROTJ deleted scene that has already been leaked was a nice tease. Been waiting for that one a long time.aox wrote:The only thing that is making me excited about this set (other than the films being in HD), is that hopefully he will include all of the deleted scenes from the original trilogy. A New Hope has something like 20-40 minutes of excised footage (though I think the other two films only have a scene or two) from what I have read. Even a dropped subplot from what I understand.
It has of course been removed, courtesy of Lucasfilm.
The funny (not) thing is, I believe it was anamorphic. I guess they can spend the money to restore deleted scenes, but not the actual films.
- oldsheperd
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 5:18 pm
- Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque
Re: Star Wars Films
Bring me up to speed, Fellas. What are these excised scenes we are talking about?
- aox
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
- Location: nYc
Re: Star Wars Films
Scroll down to "Lost Scenes" for Episode IV:oldsheperd wrote:Bring me up to speed, Fellas. What are these excised scenes we are talking about?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_ ... e#Releases" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and an incomplete list of deleted scenes from all six films:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ch ... A_New_Hope" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars Films
The blu-ray announcement is coming today.
- willoneill
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 am
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Star Wars Films
maybe?
- aox
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
- Location: nYc
Re: Star Wars Films
Yes, it is. But I think we have to wait until 2pm pst
- willoneill
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 am
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Tom Hagen
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Star Wars Films
Considerate of Lucas et al to realize a lot of people have no desire to pay for or own the prequels.
- Alphonse Doinel
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:42 pm
Re: Star Wars Films
It's too bad that you have to pay for all of them to get the special features though.
There's always a catch when it comes to Star Wars.
There's always a catch when it comes to Star Wars.
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Star Wars Films
Nice subtle reference to Lucas' crimes against humanity by releasing this September 2011th.
The article mentions this but no complaints about the lack of the untinkered original trilogy?Contrary to what some hoped and others feared, no 3D Blu-ray announcement was made.
- willoneill
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 am
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Star Wars Films
I think people have given up on that one. You can't have everything in life.swo17 wrote:The article mentions this but no complaints about the lack of the untinkered original trilogy?