Avatar and the Avatar Cadence (James Cameron, 2009-2028)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:48 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#326 Post by Oedipax » Mon May 10, 2010 7:44 pm

Amusing interview with Cameron (on the Avatar DVD and its lack of extras) in which he comes off as even more of an egomaniac than usual.

User avatar
Markson
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:50 am

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#327 Post by Markson » Mon May 10, 2010 9:05 pm

What a tool. His compensatory mix of self-congratulatory bluster and bitterness about not getting any major awards is bizarre. And his "reasons" about triple-dipping (at least!) on the Avatar disc are pretty lame, too.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#328 Post by zedz » Mon May 10, 2010 11:07 pm

Hah! So, what, he and Fox never realised that this film might, you know, have a home video release six months down the track that might benefit from some extra material? How can this clown say that sort of thing with a straight face? And expect anybody to believe that he's doing it for his audience, not as some cynical triple dippery frippery?

Actually, I'm just bitter because I bought a Mother's Day present last week and ended up with a free BluRay of this steamer. Didn't cost me a penny and I still feel ripped off!

HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#329 Post by HarryLong » Tue May 11, 2010 9:31 am

Oedipax wrote:Amusing interview with Cameron (on the Avatar DVD and its lack of extras) in which he comes off as even more of an egomaniac than usual.
I'm no fan of Cameron, but I have to applaud this:
Any movie I make that makes over a billion dollars goes out without a bunch of crap trailers for your other movies.
I'm getting a little sick of the studios' new gambit whereby you cannot get past these stinking trailers. The FF will not speed you through them. The Next Chapter button will not get you past them and pressing the Menu button has no effect. I first noticed this on the most recent Harry Potter disc & had to sit through what must have been half an hour of promos for HP merchandise & I've since encountered a few other DVDs similarly formatted.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#330 Post by zedz » Tue May 11, 2010 6:50 pm

Well, I have to agree with you (and, grudgingly, Cameron) on that count. My BluRays were pretty much limited to BFI, MoC and Criterion until recently, so I was surprised and chagrined to plug in a Disney disc and have to wade through acres of crap. And at least I could skip through it! If there are discs out there where this stuff is unskippable, that's appalling.

Back to the Cameron bashing - even though he's right in a limited and local sense, the reason the practice is unacceptable has nothing to do with Avatar and certainly nothing to do with it making a billion dollars. The only thing modest about this guy is his filmmaking talent.

Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:09 am

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#331 Post by Zot! » Wed May 12, 2010 11:03 am

I won't bother defending Avatar, as it certainly not neglected, but he doesn't sound immodest to me, just fan-boyishly enthusiastic about his work. His remarks concerning director revisionism and advertising on purchased DVDs/Blu-Rays are very respectable, and from recent posts would resonate with forum members.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#332 Post by Gregory » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:39 pm

I just happened across the news that the new Blu-ray and DVD releases will feature a "family audio track with all objectionable language removed." I wonder if this has been done with a high-profile release before -- it could set quite a precedent.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#333 Post by Gregory » Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:45 pm

They could follow up the family-friendly special edition with:

Avatar: The Special Edition For People Who Hated Avatar (We've hired script doctors and dubbed in all new dialogue -- please give the film another chance! And that ugly Papyrus font? Gone, we promise. Plus: hundreds more of the original film's crimes against good taste now corrected!)

'The Ultimate Intimacy': The Non-Family-Friendly Avatar SE (including the deleted sex scene and the porn spin-off)

Linked Avatar porn trailer is completely SFW, by the way.

HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#334 Post by HarryLong » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:53 am

Gregory wrote:Linked Avatar porn trailer is completely SFW, by the way.
Alas, my company's firewall does not agree...

User avatar
Polybius
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Rollin' down Highway 41

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#335 Post by Polybius » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:31 am

Maybe one day, if we're all good and hope hard enough, we can hear Hudson say "Well that's great, that's just doggone great, man. Now what the fudge are we supposed to do? We're in some real pretty pudding now, man... "

User avatar
MyNameCriterionForum
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#336 Post by MyNameCriterionForum » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:09 am

They should replace each objectionable epithet with the cha-ching of a cash register.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#337 Post by mfunk9786 » Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:43 pm


User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#338 Post by HistoryProf » Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:35 pm

Double You Tee Eff.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#339 Post by MichaelB » Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:32 am

Am I the only one who'd bust a gut laughing if Avatar 2 turned out to be a calamitous flop?

I suspect not.

User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#340 Post by Cold Bishop » Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:39 am

Especially since it'll be 2015/6 until the sequel's released. Still, it's too much to dream for.

User avatar
Alan Smithee
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:49 am
Location: brooklyn

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#341 Post by Alan Smithee » Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:01 pm

Oh man could this possibly be worse than the Matrix sequels?

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#342 Post by Matt » Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:08 pm

Considering the first Matrix was actually a good movie, I'd say it's already got a head start.

(Full disclosure: I've seen a total of 5 minutes, tops, of Avatar.)

User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#343 Post by Roger Ryan » Thu Jun 28, 2012 8:09 am

Matt wrote:Considering the first Matrix was actually a good movie, I'd say it's already got a head start.

(Full disclosure: I've seen a total of 5 minutes, tops, of Avatar.)
Having seen all of AVATAR and in all dimensions, I can't imagine how three additional films (9 hours?!) could be dedicated to such a banal, hackneyed premise. AVATAR has nothing like the cyberpunk philosophy of THE MATRIX to exploit nor even the political machinations of the STAR WARS prequels to stitch a story to. Cameron is going to have to come up with a completely new story/conflict just to get the first sequel made; more LAST OF THE MOHICANS or FERNGULLY is not going to cut it.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#344 Post by colinr0380 » Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:49 pm

That in a way is why I perhaps naively hope the sequels might be better, since the plot will need to go into different areas. Although I thought that about the Pirates of the Caribbean films and look how they turned out. Maybe the Na'vi could meet the Engineers from Prometheus and realise the pointlessness of existence and of living in harmony with their environment?

User avatar
Max von Mayerling
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:02 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#345 Post by Max von Mayerling » Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Predator vs. Aliens vs. Na'vi vs. Engineers vs. Avengers vs. Hobbits?

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#346 Post by domino harvey » Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:47 pm

The second sequel is actually another Spiderman reboot


User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#348 Post by mfunk9786 » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:00 pm

Do you have some examples of why you'd say this he's in the right?


User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)

#350 Post by hearthesilence » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:22 pm

:lol:

Awesome. Not a Yes fan, but I'd much rather sit through five straight listens of Fragile than Avatar. That pile of s- probably did more harm to cinema than anything else in the past 5 years. Meanwhile, media companies have finally wised up, albeit too late. Good riddance to 3D.

Post Reply