Warner Brothers Archive Collection (DVDs only)

Discuss North American DVDs and Blu-rays or other DVD and Blu-ray-related topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
mogwai
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:50 am
Location: California

Warner Brothers Archive Collection (DVDs only)

#1 Post by mogwai » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:57 pm

This news was supposed to break this Monday during the home theater forum chat with Warner Bros., but apparently Warner has set up a made-to-order program for films not yet released on DVD. Here's a link to the current titles available, and Ronald Epstein's post over at home theater discussing the details.

User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 6:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#2 Post by kaujot » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:29 pm

Wasn't it mentioned at last year's, too? Something like that. It's been announced before, in any case.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#3 Post by Matt » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:20 pm

And still no Mad Miss Manton or Panama Hattie. The presence of some great films here (Beast of the City, Idiot's Delight, personal favorite Once Upon a Honeymoon) does not bode well for their release on "legitimate" DVD.

Good news for those who have been waiting for some of these titles, though.

User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#4 Post by justeleblanc » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:24 pm

I'm excited about Altman's COUNTDOWN as well as LITTLE DRUMMER GIRL and ONE TRICK PONY.

The quality of these films (you can preview online) are all terrific, but I'm curious as to the casing and whether or not the DVDs are just DVD-Rs.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#5 Post by Matt » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:35 pm

They've got to be DVD-Rs, right? Those recent "Lost RKO" discs were DVD-Rs, and I'm sure that was a test run for this project.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#6 Post by Antoine Doinel » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:37 pm

This is great news but it's a total drag they don't ship outside the U.S.

User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:20 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#7 Post by souvenir » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:38 pm

Matt wrote:Those recent "Lost RKO" discs were DVD-Rs, and I'm sure that was a test run for this project.
Doubtful since TCM handled the Lost RKO set on its own through Movies Unlimited. It had nothing at all to do with Warner Bros.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#8 Post by Matt » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:52 pm

Except for the obvious fact that TCM is owned by Time Warner and that they would surely be sharing sales figures with the people behind this.

User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:20 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#9 Post by souvenir » Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:24 pm

I still don't think there's any evidence of a connection between the TCM RKO discs and these. The Lost RKO collection has been available for three months or so, has a few extras and consists of movies the TCM channel actually has the rights to sell. It's available internationally and comes shipped directly from Movies Unlimited.

This WB operation is a much more ambitious deal that surely was in the works for a little while. It's 150 movies so far. I wouldn't be surprised at all if regular DVDs are used.

User avatar
JAP
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 8:17 am
Location: 39ºN,8ºW
Contact:

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#10 Post by JAP » Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:33 pm

Borzage's Three Comrades is there too!... :(

Adam
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA
Contact:

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#11 Post by Adam » Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:02 pm

Matt wrote:And still no Mad Miss Manton or Panama Hattie. The presence of some great films here (Beast of the City, Idiot's Delight, personal favorite Once Upon a Honeymoon) does not bode well for their release on "legitimate" DVD.

Good news for those who have been waiting for some of these titles, though.
Yep, that's it exactly. They will never come out as full-release DVD.
The model is Smithsonian Folkways, among others. Burn to order. Soon every Warner title (I bet) that isn't out on DVD will be available this way - a boon for completists. But they will probably be DVD-rs with minimal art & notes.
Smithsonian Folkways at least prints out the full album notes with every CD.

User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:20 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#12 Post by souvenir » Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:05 pm

HTF's Ronald Epstein clarifies they'll be DVDs in the thread there.

User avatar
dadaistnun
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:31 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#13 Post by dadaistnun » Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:12 pm

Interesting that one of these releases is The Temptress, which was already available in the Garbo Silents set. It's probably the same transfer, as it appears to be the only one of these Garbos that is tinted. Glad to see these coming out, though I still wish Love had been paired with Anna Karinina on its original release.

Souls for Sale was one of the TCM Young Composers Competition films; I wonder if it will feature the winner's score.
Last edited by dadaistnun on Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.

planetjake

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#14 Post by planetjake » Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:13 pm

My... God... Wichita!

Bring on Which Way to the Front? and Cracking Up!!!

User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#15 Post by Cold Bishop » Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:28 pm

planetjake wrote:My... God... Wichita!
and The Big House! and Beast of the City! and Dusty and Sweets McGee! and Orphans!

DVD-Rs or not, this is a potential treasure trove.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#16 Post by Gregory » Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:05 pm

Wonderful to have so many more of these available in some form, but I've never paid anything close to $20 for a single film from Warner. Only a couple of these make me want to start now. I understand that the price reflects the smaller batches of these titles compared to regular Warner Classics releases. I hope there will be special offers (e.g. for those purchasing multiple titles) but don't really expect to see any.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#17 Post by domino harvey » Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:29 pm

I guess this means we'll never see that elusive Gottfried Reinhardt box. In all seriousness though, this smells of the end of star-based boxed sets to me. A lot of these titles have heavy hitters and would normally have shown up as the "b-titles" in their boxes. I'm tempted by Bhowani Junction, 4 Horsemen, and Crisis-- and the widescreen titles have a disclaimer assuring they're in the right aspect ratio =D>

EDIT: This might sweeten the deal: XB392 gets you 25% off the entire order, single use

User avatar
Forrest Taft
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:34 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#18 Post by Forrest Taft » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:04 am

Countdown, Heart Beat, Westbound... This was the best news I´d heard all year until I tried placing an order. Damn them for not shipping internationally :cry:

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#19 Post by Matt » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:58 am

souvenir wrote:HTF's Ronald Epstein clarifies they'll be DVDs in the thread there.
Robert A. Harris says they're DVD-Rs:
The discs themselves are burned, not pressed. None that I've seen have had any problems, and press vs. burn should not be a controversy.

User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:20 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#20 Post by souvenir » Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:07 pm

Ah, what a well-organized ship those chaps at HTF run

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#21 Post by domino harvey » Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:08 pm

Then the rep selected his language in the most deceiving way possible:
WB Rep wrote: The quality of these DVDs are what you would expect
from a studio like WB. They are not DVD-Rs being
slapped in an envelope. These are high quality releases
in their proper aspect ratio and manufactured to normal
studio standards.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#22 Post by Matt » Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:12 pm

He's not a rep, he's just the guy that runs HTF.

I ordered Beast of the City as a test. Free shipping, but $1.30 in sales tax!

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#23 Post by domino harvey » Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:22 pm

In that case I have next to no confidence in this experiment anymore. If I wanted DVD-Rs, I'd go get them for a third of what Warner's asking on iOffer

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#24 Post by Jeff » Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:41 pm

Matt wrote:I ordered Beast of the City as a test. Free shipping, but $1.30 in sales tax!
Be sure to report back to us, Matt. I've been wavering on ordering half a dozen titles, but like others, I'm dubious on the quality.

User avatar
myrnaloyisdope
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#25 Post by myrnaloyisdope » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:17 pm

Yup, the issue I have is that most of the films listed I have quality rips from TCM and other sources.

So as much as I want The Beast of the City, Trail of '98, and The Red Mill in officially released DVD form, if they are just going to put out DVD-R's, what's the point of paying $20 US to upgrade from the DVD-R's I already have?

Oh, and I live in Canada, so apparently my business isn't wanted anyway.

Post Reply