Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Post Reply
Message
Author
James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:11 pm

Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#1 Post by James » Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:26 am

mfunk9786 wrote: Quite frankly, she's deserved supporting Oscar nominations for [...] and the-film-that-shall-not-be-named, Garden State;
This has got to be a sick joke. Her performance in Garden State is one of the worst I've ever seen and isn't even worthy of a Razzie. It's the very definition of unsubtle overacting.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Black Swan (Darren Aronofsky, 2010)

#2 Post by mfunk9786 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:57 am

James wrote:
mfunk9786 wrote: Quite frankly, she's deserved supporting Oscar nominations for [...] and the-film-that-shall-not-be-named, Garden State;
This has got to be a sick joke. Her performance in Garden State is one of the worst I've ever seen and isn't even worthy of a Razzie. It's the very definition of unsubtle overacting.
Though you might disagree, I actually meant that sincerely. I found it very natural, and I've known my fair share of people with that level of energy and genuine spontaneous goodwill (see: the bathtub scene). The movie isn't going to go down in history, but her performance (along with an amusing supporting character here and there and some creative direction at times) felt to me like its standout good quality.

James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:11 pm

Re: Black Swan (Darren Aronofsky, 2010)

#3 Post by James » Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:36 am

mfunk9786 wrote:
James wrote:
mfunk9786 wrote: Quite frankly, she's deserved supporting Oscar nominations for [...] and the-film-that-shall-not-be-named, Garden State;
This has got to be a sick joke. Her performance in Garden State is one of the worst I've ever seen and isn't even worthy of a Razzie. It's the very definition of unsubtle overacting.
Though you might disagree, I actually meant that sincerely. I found it very natural, and I've known my fair share of people with that level of energy and genuine spontaneous goodwill (see: the bathtub scene). The movie isn't going to go down in history, but her performance (along with an amusing supporting character here and there and some creative direction at times) felt to me like its standout good quality.
I've been given the same justifications from other people ("I know people like that") and while it still doesn't make her performance any less superficial or hollow for me (nor does it make her character any less superficial or hollow for me), because others seem to find some worth in her performance, I can let it slide. This time. [-(

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Black Swan (Darren Aronofsky, 2010)

#4 Post by Murdoch » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:43 am

I will never understand why Garden State arouses such contempt in people.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Black Swan (Darren Aronofsky, 2010)

#5 Post by domino harvey » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:45 am

Garden State's not a bad film, it's just so earnest and it's fans are so moon-eyed and easy to make fun of that it's hard to resist sometimes. I kind of like it, it's always struck me as a cute collection of unified short stories

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Black Swan (Darren Aronofsky, 2010)

#6 Post by mfunk9786 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:52 pm

And for a first (and perhaps only?) directorial effort, there's a lot of creativity and visual flair there.

User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Black Swan (Darren Aronofsky, 2010)

#7 Post by Tom Hagen » Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:27 pm

You know what did me in on Garden State? The diploma on the ceiling of the Dr.'s office. Honestly.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Garden State (Braff, 2004)

#8 Post by mfunk9786 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:30 pm

Hey, spoiler tags!

User avatar
chaddoli
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#9 Post by chaddoli » Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:51 pm

I agree with domino's assessment - and I have a feeling very few of us watched the movie recently - but it's interesting to me that Braff hasn't directed another film. I know he's had some planned and they have fallen through. He seemed to fully embrace his Scrubs role, directing episodes as well. Garden State, whatever you think about it as an actual film, was very influential, it was one of the first very successful indiewood quirkfests. The film sort of defines that template (keep in mind I'm not calling it original). By the time he makes another film, the style has risen to prominence and will probably be considered contemptuous by more people.

User avatar
Alphonse Doinel
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:42 pm

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#10 Post by Alphonse Doinel » Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:41 pm

Come on people, John Mayer said it was one of the best films of the decade. It must be true.

It's actually a guilty pleasure of mine. If you can look past all its flaws, its quite enjoyable. Peter Sarsgaard is fantastic in it.

Numero Trois
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:23 am
Location: Florida

Re: Black Swan (Darren Aronofsky, 2010)

#11 Post by Numero Trois » Sun Sep 12, 2010 7:00 pm

domino harvey wrote:Garden State's not a bad film, it's just so earnest
Please shoot me now. Just noticed how there's a plethora of clips from that same scene on youtube....

Yeah, the film actually is tolerable. It does have a resonance that's more genuine and satisfying than something like Juno. It's kitsch, but at least its competent kitsch. Braff said it took him years and years to accumulate the observations that he put into the film. Maybe its just as well then that other projects have fallen to the wayside.

I think this type of comedy is not something that loses favor over time. Off the top of my head, I think of TV shows like Northern Exposure, Newhart or Picket Fences. Surely one could go back a lot further than that. There's always something out there in that vein. It's been that way for years.

jojo
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:47 pm

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#12 Post by jojo » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:16 pm

I like how a small little comment in another thread suddenly became its own film thread.

I don't recall a whole lot about Garden State actually. I've seen so many that are just like it, so it doesn't really stand out in my mind. Not exactly an acting vehicle for any particular actor in my opinion.

User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#13 Post by aox » Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:30 pm

It was tolerable until the junk-yard scene, and after that it completely fell apart for me.

However, I found Portman's role in this somewhat terrible and clunky. It seemed to me she was delivering her lines as if she was receiving them through an earpiece.

User avatar
Peacock
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:47 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#14 Post by Peacock » Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:33 pm

aox wrote:It seemed to me she was delivering her lines as if she was receiving them through an earpiece.
This was a technique used by Rossellini in some of his history films!

User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#15 Post by aox » Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:40 pm

Peacock wrote:
aox wrote:It seemed to me she was delivering her lines as if she was receiving them through an earpiece.
This was a technique used by Rossellini in some of his history films!
And by Godard; specifically, in La Chinoise.

User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:22 am
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#16 Post by jbeall » Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:52 pm

I didn't care for Garden State and thought that it, like many "quirkfests" of its type, was rather forgettable. And a lot of that had to do (for me, anyway) with the believability of the characters. I found Portman's character to be particularly terribly written.

In reference to the conversation that began this thread, however, I'll give her credit for trying to say her lines with a straight face (I vaguely recall some conversation in front of a fireplace that had simply horrendous dialogue). But I don't think that this film (or the Star Wars trilogy, for that matter) is a fair example with which to judge her acting chops.

User avatar
gokinsmen
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#17 Post by gokinsmen » Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:31 pm

I guess Garden State did pioneer the art of the Indiewood trailer. So it's got that going for it.

Some anonymous sap in a marketing dept probably put that together and didn't even get credit. No credit for the only tolerable thing about that flick.

User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#18 Post by Tom Hagen » Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:18 am

The trailer reminds me that 2004 : the year "indie" broke. This soundtrack (which oddly didn't include all that much indie in retrospect) and Pitchfork/Arcade Fire blew the doors open on how to market what was once was once the underground.


User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#20 Post by mfunk9786 » Tue Sep 15, 2015 6:05 pm

The only thing cruel about that Vice article is how unreadably unfunny it was.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#21 Post by domino harvey » Tue Sep 15, 2015 6:06 pm

mfunk9786 wrote:Vice article
unreadably unfunny
Your story checks out

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#22 Post by mfunk9786 » Tue Sep 15, 2015 7:10 pm

The HuffPo article seems absurdly cruel too, actually. Where were all these people when the film was released?

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#23 Post by hearthesilence » Tue Sep 15, 2015 8:12 pm

It was never a favorite, but I don't recall it being that bad. Braff has drawn a lot more ill will over the years for various reasons, which may account for some of the malicious hate against the film - in 2004, I didn't really hear anything about him outside of the critically adored Scrubs.

User avatar
Dylan
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:28 pm

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#24 Post by Dylan » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:03 pm

I haven't seen this in ten years, but at the time I thought it was okay and the cinematography was good. Among the special features on the DVD is a great deleted scene between Braff and Ian Holm (who played Braff's father in the film) that is far better than anything that ended up in the finished film. In it Holm's character remembers the day his wife died, and I recall it being devastating, with Holm giving a great performance.

I seem to remember that Braff's follow up to this was supposed to be his own adaptation of Susanne Bier's Open Hearts, but that never happened.

User avatar
thirtyframesasecond
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Garden State (Zach Braff, 2004)

#25 Post by thirtyframesasecond » Wed Sep 16, 2015 8:59 am

The only things I remember about this were the three of them screaming in some moment of catharsis and Natalie Portman talking about the Shins. That bit was about as bad as Levitt/Deschanel talking about the Smiths in the lift in 500 Days of Summer and Anna Kendrick talking about David Guetta in Pitch Perfect. As you can imagine, I don't really like people in films talking about music!

Post Reply