830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
It said 4K when the specs were first posted.
-
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 4:44 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
He was one of my university lecturers.Ashirg wrote:What edition is that from?Audio commentary from 2005 featuring film scholar Adrian Martin
- feihong
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:20 pm
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
There was a Madman DVD in Australia, long out of print, where that commentary comes from, I think.giovannii84 wrote:He was one of my university lecturers.Ashirg wrote:What edition is that from?Audio commentary from 2005 featuring film scholar Adrian Martin
- bugsy_pal
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 1:28 am
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
That's right. I have the out-of-print Madman disc, although it's from 2010. Perhaps the Martin commentary was done earlier for another version, or it sat in Madman's vault for a while until they released it.feihong wrote:There was a Madman DVD in Australia, long out of print, where that commentary comes from, I think.Audio commentary from 2005 featuring film scholar Adrian Martin
-
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:06 am
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
And the press email confirms both Chimes and Immortal story are from 4k restorations.
Last edited by albucat on Tue May 17, 2016 6:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:23 am
- Location: Florida
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Not at all. It's a tremendous film. Like Drucker said, every facet of the film resonates. There's a rich balance on multiple levels that Citizen Kane simply doesn't have. Even Welles's acting resonates on a deeper level, unlike with CK where it felt like he was relying more on joie de vivre than on deeper emotional truth.Ribs wrote:I know that but it's still an odd statement. Maybe "capstone" or something is more what they were going for?
- feihong
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:20 pm
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Numero Trois wrote:Not at all. It's a tremendous film. Like Drucker said, every facet of the film resonates. There's a rich balance on multiple levels that Citizen Kane simply doesn't have. Even Welles's acting resonates on a deeper level, unlike with CK where it felt like he was relying more on joie de vivre than on deeper emotional truth.Ribs wrote:I know that but it's still an odd statement. Maybe "capstone" or something is more what they were going for?
I know. I love The Immortal Story, too.
-
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:31 am
- Location: Somerset, England
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
I think "crowning achievement" to describe Chimes was partly chosen to be apposite for the subject of the film.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Interesting, The Immortal Story has as good a supplement package as Chimes if not better.
Was The Immortal Story initially intended for television?
Was The Immortal Story initially intended for television?
- Roger Ryan
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
It was, but a 1.66:1 ratio works fine for it...just not the framing that has previously appeared on DVD or on TCM. My main hope is that this issue was handled carefully (astonishingly, when this film was screened as part of a Welles retrospective at Indiana University last year, it was shown in approximately 2.40:1 which was completely inappropriate!).FrauBlucher wrote: Was The Immortal Story initially intended for television?
EDIT: Looking at the excerpt found on the Criterion page for this film, the framing looks more accurate than the old Madman DVD (and the TCM broadcast version). The additional information found on all four sides certainly helps.
-
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:29 am
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Just think, Jess Franco enters the Collection...
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Actually he is already in thanks to Death of a Cyclist.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Something that I'm curious about in a general wider Shakespeare sense is whether there is any consensus on a particular ordering of where The Merry Wives of Windsor might fall in terms of the Falstaff character? Are there any theories on whether Shakespeare intended the character to be pre-Prince Hal, or post-abandonment? Or is it better to just see the Merry Wives of Windsor as a side adventure somewhat out of time, so it could potentially be placed anywhere, with different resonances for the character in that movement?
And following on from that, how does Welles fold the Merry Wives of Windsor material into the wider Falstaff character?
And following on from that, how does Welles fold the Merry Wives of Windsor material into the wider Falstaff character?
- Sloper
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 10:06 pm
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
I'm not sure what the critical consensus is, but Merry Wives seems to be a kind of 'side adventure', aimed at audiences who enjoyed 2 Henry IV (since it features Pistol and Shallow in major roles) and maybe Henry V, but who are probably being asked to imagine the action taking place between the two Henry IV plays.
Welles' film doesn't really use any of the plot of Merry Wives, just isolated lines here and there. The most substantial borrowing that I remember is the scene when Falstaff says, 'I must turn away some of my followers', which takes on a much more melancholy tone in this new context.
By the way, if anyone is really interested in Welles' weaving together of Shakespeare plays, the 'Rutgers Films in Print' volume edited by Bridget Gellert Lyons has very detailed marginal notes identifying the source of every line, and identifying those lines written by Welles himself.
And yes, much as I love Citizen Kane, I definitely think of Chimes as Welles' crowning achievement. It's wonderful that it will finally get the home video treatment it deserves.
Welles' film doesn't really use any of the plot of Merry Wives, just isolated lines here and there. The most substantial borrowing that I remember is the scene when Falstaff says, 'I must turn away some of my followers', which takes on a much more melancholy tone in this new context.
By the way, if anyone is really interested in Welles' weaving together of Shakespeare plays, the 'Rutgers Films in Print' volume edited by Bridget Gellert Lyons has very detailed marginal notes identifying the source of every line, and identifying those lines written by Welles himself.
And yes, much as I love Citizen Kane, I definitely think of Chimes as Welles' crowning achievement. It's wonderful that it will finally get the home video treatment it deserves.
- bottled spider
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:59 am
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Merry Wives is believed to have been commissioned for an occasion by Queen Elizabeth, who wanted to see the Falstaff character again. My understanding is Shakespeare outright resurrected a dead character. I don't think Merry Wives can be made to fit the chronology of the Henriad. In 2 Henry IV, Falstaff hasn't seen Shallow in a very long time, so the appearance of Shallow in Merry Wives places Merry Wives after 2 Henry IV. Henry V begins very soon after the coronation ending 2 Henry IV. So I think we have to imagine Merry Wives as taking place after Henry V, simply ignoring the death of Falstaff.
- teddyleevin
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:25 pm
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Merry Wives definitely doesn't fit into any Henriad chronology. In my head, the brilliant Verdi/Boito opera Falstaff, which is essentially the plot of Merry Wives but with added pathos/dialogue/etc from the Henriad (brilliantly interwoven) exists in some sort of purgatory, out of time, using these characters. RE: the play (which is a weak one), if the QE story is to be believed, then it's possible that you can say Merry Wives is a fictional repurposing of the characters while the Henriad represents the historical chronology in which folks would watch the comedy.
- Michael Kerpan
- Spelling Bee Champeen
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
- Location: New England
- Contact:
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
In ancient, every dramatic trilogy required an accompanying satyr play, right?
Another vote for the wonderful Boito/Verdi adaptation -- certainly one of the greatest operas ever...
Another vote for the wonderful Boito/Verdi adaptation -- certainly one of the greatest operas ever...
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Chimes...Beaver Looks amazing. Love the menu.
- Max von Mayerling
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:02 pm
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
I figured it would have optional english subtitles, but I'm glad to see it confirmed. Given that it is Shakespeare + the variable quality of the audio, this strikes me as almost a special feature in itself.
- med
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:58 pm
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
I saw the restoration a few weeks ago and there's definitely still parts where the dialogue sounds muffled and tinny.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
- Drucker
- Your Future our Drucker
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
I can say with near certainty Immortal Story looked nothing like that when I saw a 35mm screening theatrically two years ago. It closely resembled the TCM broadcast I had seen. That's not to say it was right, but the colors were not this rich and did not pop like this. It had a strong yellow haze over a lot of it.
With that said, there's no telling that was correct. I've been meaning to ask some of the people here more knowledgeable about film stocks why and how the fade to yellow is so common. That could have very well been the case here. It very much looks "restored."
For what it's worth, the blu-ray of F For Fake looked very similar to the 35mm print I saw.
This image I found on Google resembles what I've seen
With that said, there's no telling that was correct. I've been meaning to ask some of the people here more knowledgeable about film stocks why and how the fade to yellow is so common. That could have very well been the case here. It very much looks "restored."
For what it's worth, the blu-ray of F For Fake looked very similar to the 35mm print I saw.
This image I found on Google resembles what I've seen
- Big Ben
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
Re: 830-831 Chimes at Midnight & The Immortal Story
Just finished The Immortal Story about an hour ago. Can't say it's necessarily anything to write home about but it should be of interest to Welles aficionados like myself. It's short and sweet and to the point. No filler. I can't say it's worth the price unless you really want to complete Welles' filmography. Pick it up at a sale.
- Mr Sausage
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Canada
Chimes at Midnight (Orson Welles, 1965)
DISCUSSION ENDS MONDAY, DECEMBER 19th
Members have a two week period in which to discuss the film before it's moved to its dedicated thread in The Criterion Collection subforum. Please read the Rules and Procedures.
This thread is not spoiler free. This is a discussion thread; you should expect plot points of the individual films under discussion to be discussed openly. See: spoiler rules.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
I encourage members to submit questions, either those designed to elicit discussion and point out interesting things to keep an eye on, or just something you want answered. This will be extremely helpful in getting discussion started. Starting is always the hardest part, all the more so if it's unguided. Questions can be submitted to me via PM.
Members have a two week period in which to discuss the film before it's moved to its dedicated thread in The Criterion Collection subforum. Please read the Rules and Procedures.
This thread is not spoiler free. This is a discussion thread; you should expect plot points of the individual films under discussion to be discussed openly. See: spoiler rules.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
I encourage members to submit questions, either those designed to elicit discussion and point out interesting things to keep an eye on, or just something you want answered. This will be extremely helpful in getting discussion started. Starting is always the hardest part, all the more so if it's unguided. Questions can be submitted to me via PM.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Chimes at Midnight (Orson Welles, 1965)
As I'm sure I've said many times, I don't have much use for Shakespeare adaptations (or performances, but that's really where I go off the rails of acceptable opinions), but a creative mishmash like this seems the best use of an ill-fit. The history plays on the whole are my least favorite Shakespeare works, though Falstaff is indisputably one of Shakespeare's greatest characters (and Shakespeare knew damn well it was so, since he wrote an bawdy cash-in around him, the Merry Wives of Windsor, one of the earliest examples of fan service). Here the narrative is more fully wrapped to Falstaff's service, and it works. Welles' bluster and bravado and quick wit comes across in spades, and Welles makes the most of his rearrangement to craft the social mobility tragedy already present in Shakespeare to a more concise and conventionally satisfying conclusion. I don't know that it's better than the plays it borrows from (even if it basically the two Henry IVs with the boring parts excised), but it's an interesting and worthy companion piece.
And wow, this release is incredibly stacked with hours of bonus materials and 100% Criterion at their best. I hope everyone remembers this title when we start casting year-end ballots next week. I'm still working through the extras but I love the sad revelation in the McBride interview about Charlton Heston and Anne Baxter wanting Welles to make movies he already made.
Since conversation is already lacking, here's a question anyone reading can answer without even having to have seen this film: What for you is the best Shakespeare performance in film? It's a testament to Welles' film and performance that I cannot remember how I pictured Falstaff when working through Shakespeare in college, as after watching this Welles just is Falstaff. Bryce Dallas Howard's Rosalind is the only other Shakespeare performance I can think of where the depiction is so dead-on as to forever alter my perception of the character.
And wow, this release is incredibly stacked with hours of bonus materials and 100% Criterion at their best. I hope everyone remembers this title when we start casting year-end ballots next week. I'm still working through the extras but I love the sad revelation in the McBride interview about Charlton Heston and Anne Baxter wanting Welles to make movies he already made.
Since conversation is already lacking, here's a question anyone reading can answer without even having to have seen this film: What for you is the best Shakespeare performance in film? It's a testament to Welles' film and performance that I cannot remember how I pictured Falstaff when working through Shakespeare in college, as after watching this Welles just is Falstaff. Bryce Dallas Howard's Rosalind is the only other Shakespeare performance I can think of where the depiction is so dead-on as to forever alter my perception of the character.