It is currently Sat May 27, 2017 9:12 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 185 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 4:55 pm 

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:04 pm
Can you explain the Wes Anderson spine significance? Maybe I'm forgetting something or just brain dead today


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 5:33 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
They worked Life Aquatic and Mr. Fox to be 300 and 700 respectively, leaving gaps at the time of their releases. The latter wasn't so bad but when Aquatic came out they were only in the late 280s and didn't get to 301 for another few months, so it was obvious they gave the title the "special" 300 mark.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2017 6:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN
motefuzz wrote:
Dead or Deader wrote:
The kids are too busy uploading Twin Peaks episodes onto their tablet to even cared about purchasing physical media!



While this is a joke, it's kind of an important point. Lynch has said in multiple interviews FWWM is important to the upcoming season. If you're one of the many who first saw the show on Netflix or wherever the hell its streaming now, where do you go for FWWM? Buying a box set isn't really a fun option for most people. Locking this in as a Criterion is a pretty solid move. Both business wise and for the legitimacy of the film, which will have more eyes on it soon than it has in decades.


The easy answer is you get FWWM on Showtime as that is ostensibly where you are watching Season 3 anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2017 7:02 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Just as an aside, Showtime feels like the perfect place for this reboot, since it seems like most of Lynch's movies have been on rotation there more than any of the other premium channels.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2017 7:50 am 

Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:41 pm
Well, I think there may be a reason for that...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2017 3:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
I'm not talking about now, but just since at least the time of Blue Velvet


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Twin Peaks
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2017 5:23 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
mfunk9786 wrote:
If you're in Philadelphia or can get there, tickets are running alarmingly low for the second of two screenings (the first sold out) of a fan-made cut of Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me with the deleted scenes from The Missing Pieces re-inserted back into the film using Lynch's screenplay as a guide for their chronological placement. I have no idea how good or bad this is going to be in terms of the quality of the work doing this splicing, and am keeping my expectations low, but it sounds like a great idea in general despite my usual aversion to seeing anything that isn't director-approved when possible.

Returned from this tonight both dazzled by Lynch's career-best work on this film and frustrated by the idea that merely re-inserting deleted material would result in something resembling a "complete" work rather than an "incomplete" one. The actual handiwork of putting The Missing Pieces back into Fire Walk with Me was seamless (until the first post-film credit was to a bunch of online usernames...) - the film looked fantastic throughout and there was never a point where I even noticed an unusual cut or insertion of new material. It flowed like a completed film would. But it was not Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me. There are some truly wonderful moments in the Palmer household (highlighted by a chant of an Icelandic phrase) that contrast with the moments of sheer horror that made it into the final cut of the film, along with intimate portraits of Laura's comparatively low-impact interactions with the Hayward and Briggs families that really bring to horrifying light how awful her home life was. But with the context of the series in tact (presumably - again, I have no point of comparison to someone who has seen this film but didn't watch Twin Peaks), I don't see these scenes as being necessary and I can understand why Lynch saw them as acceptable cuts.

That being said, taken as a total package, there are moments that I can't believe we've been deprived of for all these years - Chris Isaak beating up the sheriff, Laura and Donna's terrifying joyride to the film's loud and stimulating centerpiece, and the hilarious moment when Isaak and Sutherland are interviewing a coworker of Teresa's while we get a fourth wall-breaking look at why a Lynchian lightbulb is flickering in the background.

But where the cut faltered the most is during check-ins with the series' regulars - they suddenly feel so useless - one wonders why Lynch wasted his time giving us a little peek at what these characters were up to in the week leading up to Laura's death, because as far as the story is concerned, what does it matter?

There is an excellent middle ground cut of this film (Criterion + Lynch, maybe?) that has yet to be seen that would pull in the scenes that flesh out both the stunning introductory sequences of the film and Laura's truly terrifying home life, but I'm afraid to say that in spite of my love of the TV series, the rest of this fan edit falls short due to the same sweet comedic touches that made this whole enterprise so successful in the first place. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has always been such a powerful film because of its exploration of the sort of evil that resulted in Laura Palmer's death, and her hopeless day-to-day reality, and adding little asides with our favorite TV buddies sort of drains all of the blood from that, both literally and figuratively, even if the insertion of some of these Missing Pieces adds to the terror in an impressive way here and there.

One other thing I will say though - Sheryl Lee gives perhaps my favorite performance in the history of cinema, and it's the reason why I'm so enthralled with this film and why I think it's woefully underrated even in this moment of re-evaluation it's been granted on the heels of the new Showtime season. Never has Lynch's vision of a terrifying underbelly in 'aw, shucks' suburban life been so fully fleshed out, and never have the effects of such horror been visualized in such a crystalline way on the face of an actress. Lee gives this film everything she ever had and then some, and taking the journey of Laura Palmer's final days with her is not only a voyeuristic surprise (I mean - how insane is it that anyone gave Lynch enough money to make this?), but an absolute honor. We're watching someone working through some of the most complicated and difficult emotions imaginable, with a whole lot of context and backstory and texture, and for what? This film was panned upon release, ignored for years following that, and only now carefully revisited as some sort of Pandora's Box full of clues as if Lynch was ever remotely interested in just making paint-by-numbers puzzle boxes for us to solve. This film is underrated, sure - but Lee's performance (and career, in retrospect) - deserves so, so, so much better. She, much like Laura, was robbed of so much.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2017 5:51 pm 

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:45 pm
Great post, mfunk. I agree completely - I think the Missing Pieces are pretty terrific, but they only should be seen on their own, as a separate film/compilation of deleted scenes. Putting them into the film itself does not interest me, and not only because fan edits in general I don't care for just out of principle, altering the director's vision and rarely if ever actually besting it.

But I'd make two main points: 1) The film is already pretty long at 135 minutes or so, and making it into a 3+ hour epic just does no favors. In all honesty, FWWM could probably use some trimming as it is, certainly not expansion and becoming an even more digressive film. Basically, when you consider the Missing Pieces and how much they digress and detour and have often nothing really to do with Laura's story, I think it makes sense because Lynch had just made Wild at Heart -- his most narratively digressive, messy film - very maximalist in a way, showing us so many flashbacks or visions or superfluous and quirky new characters that it becomes overwhelming. FWWM with the Missing Pieces wasn't quite on that level but it's still going in that direction. And I'm very happy that he cut those out and made it a more focused and devastating film. But even as is, I'd say some of the FBI stuff feels kind of unnecessary (much as I love it) -- mainly just the one scene with Cooper and Albert where Coop says he knows who the next victim is, as it cuts in between Laura's story and thus seems kind of jarring. Hell, I adore the opening prelude in Deer Meadow, really love it, but I think one could make the case for cutting out the whole opening section and just starting with Laura. That would be an even more powerful, focused film.

I do think there's 2 or 3, tops, scenes from the Missing Pieces that I would indeed say could fit well in FWWM... I think mainly of the creepy as fuck scene of Laura waiting in the bushes for James and then seeing Leland walk up the front path and stare in her direction with this demonic glare, really eerie; and also, the heartwarming little scene in the Hayward house where Doc gives Laura a "prescription." But... this leads to my other point, which is that... 2) The Missing Pieces are actually shot and edited in quite a different way from FWWM. I don't know how much of this was Lynch circa 2014 choosing certain coverage/angles in editing them, but it's very noticeable the way that the MP are shot in a way more like the series: wide shots, static master shots, just generally minimal camera movement, are all quite present. Contrast this with FWWM, which is striking for its departure from the series's more classical wide master shots, instead using a ton of visceral, emotional close-ups, and a kind of kinetic, fractured editing style that's more radical than the more conventional/leisurely long takes found in both the series and the MP. So even if Lynch decided to use wider shots and longer takes for the MP in 2014 instead of using FWWM-esque close-ups, etc, then it still means that any fan edit of the two will have this aesthetic discrepancy.

And yes, mfunk, Sheryl Lee in FWWM is certainly one of my very favorite performances in all of cinema. She is so raw, so committed, so real, it's unbelievable; as if she was channeling this dark and dangerous force, really -- it's not surprising to read her saying how hard it was to shake the character off afterwards. It's an astonishing film, just that it even exists... so much of it was comprised of unlikely circumstances converging and happy accidents. It's the movie that really shows Lynch for the humanist he is, it's really one of the most compassionate films out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2017 7:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
I generally think that it is better to view the relationship of The Missing Pieces to Fire Walk With Me as being equivalent to the relationship that More Things That Happened has to Inland Empire (and I kind of have a suspicion that we wouldn't have had The Missing Pieces in the form it was presented in without the creation of More Things That Happened a few years earlier). They're both about existing in a world of moments in which the demands of narrative drive that the main features are necessarily tied to, loose as they may be, have been removed. Both of those works feel somewhat liberated by their underground status as a 'collection of deleted scenes that have been composed into a feature length piece' (and I think that I may enjoy More Things That Happened even more than Inland Empire itself!).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:46 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2016 2:43 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
As if we needed more confirmation than a firey wok cooking meat....

According to one Redditor and a handful of Instagrammers, it appears Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me now appears on Apple TV with the wacky C.

https://www.reddit.com/r/criterion/comm ... g_up_with/


Its also showing up the same in the app store on my iPhone 7.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 185 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection