1058 The Irishman
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Exactly what I thought, Roger. He knows him well enough to know when he returns whether the job is done.
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Yeah? Scorsese has been open about his financing issues and the need for a big star. DeNiro is still bankable, unlike Pacino who has no Bad Grampa to his name, and having an easy marketing gimmick is greatly beneficial. It wouldn't surprise me if DeNiro was the acceptable comprise of big star that Scorsese needed.therewillbeblus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 11:22 amRight, because nobody wants to distribute a Scorsese movie, or one with Pacino, unless De Niro who is at his career peak is involved.Black Hat wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:40 amFinancing. Deniro's the only reason this film got made.therewillbeblus wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:08 amSomething I’ve been thinking about in the last few weeks is how Scorsese’s casting of De Niro seems to have a potentially ulterior motive
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Didn't De Niro come to Scorsese with this first, in both of them trying to find something to work on? Beyond just being the first-billed, he was also on the ground floor of this as a producer and his company helped with the distribution.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Yeah, this whole thing started with De Niro developing the project with Scorsese, not sure why we're spinning yarns about things that have already been documented
- therewillbeblus
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
I'm not saying De Niro wasn't involved at the beginning but given Netflix's eagerness to finance and distribute auteurist films as of late, I don't think it's hard to believe that they would have financed Scorsese's next film regardless of that star's participation, but I clearly read the response incorrectly as insinuating rather than literally. Either way, that didn't address my main point about Scorsese finding an interesting way to use De Niro's current relaxed expressiveness to the film's benefit, which was the real intention of the post rather than the mechanics of how the project started.
- diamonds
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:35 pm
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Except, your original post is still flawed because of its fundamental misattribution. De Niro came to Scorsese with the project, his emotional attachment to the material was the impetus for the film and undoubtedly sculpted the performance; it's not some ingenious casting coup on Scorsese's part. In pursuit of a more traditional auteurist reading you're marginalizing De Niro's contributions to the work. (Didn't Rosenbaum identify De Niro as one of the four auteurs of Taxi Driver? I see no reason why that line of thinking couldn't apply to this film).
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Right, it was his reaction to the book (one of getting emotional over how sad it was) and their initial discussions about what this film would look like that drove the direction that Scorsese wanted to take the film. I don't think Scorsese, or De Niro, consider their careers as cynically as outsiders looking in do. A 76-year-old Scorsese has better things to do than to construct meta-narratives about how his friend De Niro was panned for his performance in Bad Grandpa
- therewillbeblus
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
You're right, I'm sure it was a collaborative process as is all their work. I didn't mean to imply a skewed relationship with Scorsese as this puppeteer to De Niro's void of agency, and tried to ensure that I didn't convey a message of manipulation by comparing this as an inverse, but wanted to throw out the idea that De Niro's general demeanor he's grown into over the years that feels like a comfortable kind of passive confidence (not a dig) was utilized (in general, not by Scorsese alone) to a unique effect here. Alternate perspectives are able to bring out certain sides of an actor they cannot access alone, just as an actor is able to bring skills and thoughts to the table that a director may have not otherwise considered, and is it really that far-fetched to assume that Scorsese may have directed De Niro in a certain direction, as the film's director and someone who has known the man and worked with him for decades? I don't see how that is mutually exclusive from the idea that the process was collaborative, which of course it was. My semantics were off, sure, but the idea is the same.diamonds wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2019 5:39 pmExcept, your original post is still flawed because of its fundamental misattribution. De Niro came to Scorsese with the project, his emotional attachment to the material was the impetus for the film and undoubtedly sculpted the performance; it's not some ingenious casting coup on Scorsese's part. In pursuit of a more traditional auteurist reading you're marginalizing De Niro's contributions to the work. (Didn't Rosenbaum identify De Niro as one of the four auteurs of Taxi Driver? I see no reason why that line of thinking couldn't apply to this film).
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Apropos of the current discussion: let’s not forget that Raging Bull was De Niro’s passion project, and Scorsese had to be convinced to do it. It always sounded, from the years of lead up, this was mot dissimilar.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
As for the other way around, I believe that Warner Brothers would only make Goodfellas is if De Niro was cast.
-
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:13 pm
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
John Malkovich was one of the casting choices for the Jimmy role before Warner wanted a more bankable star in De Niro. Scorsese has tended to have trouble even attracting financial backing without the presence of his major leading men, Bob and Leo.flyonthewall2983 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:07 pmAs for the other way around, I believe that Warner Brothers would only make Goodfellas is if De Niro was cast.
- Finch
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, UK
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Early viewing figures on Netflix are promising even when accounting for people who didn't watch it all the way through. Netflix surely has data on how many people simply stopped for a break and resumed at a later date.
- Finch
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, UK
- Noiretirc
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:04 pm
- Location: VanIsle
- Contact:
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
I've read more than a couple of reviews where they state that the de-aging/CGI was so unconvincing that it ruined the viewing experience. I'm afraid to watch this.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
It's really only bad on De Niro, and mainly because we all know what younger De Niro looked like and it wasn't this. You get used to it, though
-
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 11:58 am
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
It isn't distracting in the sense you can see the pixels or whatever. It is a failure in the sense that nobody really looks young at all. Even at his youngest, De Niro looks over 50. Once you accept that, it is fine. The performances are compelling enough that you don't notice the CGI. But everyone being old all the time might not give you a sense of timelines or how much time has passed.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Quite quickly, in fact. I was bothered by it for approximately two minutes of a 3.5 hour film. I'm shocked that there are reviews of this that indicate that there's some problem that ruins the film - I wouldn't trust those critic(s) as far as I could throw them.domino harvey wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 6:57 pmIt's really only bad on De Niro, and mainly because we all know what younger De Niro looked like and it wasn't this. You get used to it, though
-
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:49 am
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Yeah anyone hung up on the cgi in this film is not engaged for other reasons. There is far more unconvincing cgi in many blockbusters.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
I almost laughed at how short the WWII flashback was because so much was made from the closeup they made of the still of him in the uniform.
- Finch
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, UK
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Considering that the scene at the grave features some of the most unconvincing effects, I'm surprised Netflix picked it for inclusion in the bundle of pictures to be released prior to the film's opening. I have to agree though: while the effect is obvious, I found it only distracting initially.
- cdnchris
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
The only part that really took me out was when De Niro was beating up the shopkeeper. It looked like the body of an 80-year-old man beating up someone despite the deaging effects on the face. Otherwise it was incredibly easy to get past everything else related to the effects.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
After seeing it last week and then ruminating over it. I have to say I didn’t love it. I have to agree with several posts up thread, especially Domino’s. The pacing took me out of it. There were parts I became restless. Although I was in a theater and not at home, so maybe that had something to do with it. It didn’t have the flashiness of Goodfellas or Casino. Maybe it had to do with these mobsters (not the actors themselves) being in their twilight. And the de-aging didn’t make a big difference in my eyes. Early on DeNiro driving the truck, he looked plastic and waxy which jumped out at me, along with the scene Chris mentioned with the grocer.
I did love Pesci’s performance. Never saw that coming. Pacino was Pacino and DeNiro was DeNiro. Too bad Keitel didn’t have more of a role. And I thought Scorsese’s stock players, Romano and Cannavale, were excellent.
For me Silence is much closer to a late period Scorsese masterpiece for what that’s worth.
I did love Pesci’s performance. Never saw that coming. Pacino was Pacino and DeNiro was DeNiro. Too bad Keitel didn’t have more of a role. And I thought Scorsese’s stock players, Romano and Cannavale, were excellent.
For me Silence is much closer to a late period Scorsese masterpiece for what that’s worth.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
Pesci's last scenes really may have stuck out among everything else, which is no small feat considering the brilliance of everyone else from De Niro and Pacino on down to Jesse Plemons and Anna Paquin. But there was something about seeing him in the wheelchair and being so convincing in the old-age makeup and the wheel chair and talking without his teeth, that really spoke to me about how death gets us all, even the ones we find intimidating in life.
- therewillbeblus
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm
Re: The Irishman (Martin Scorsese, 2019)
This sums up my reaction. The De Niro scenes following and up until the final shot are powerful but this scene in prison with Pesci really sobered me up to the meaninglessness of what came before and the pathos in the missed opportunities that come from assigning false meaning and disengaging from the depth that we fear facing. Time is used in such a way that strips away all facades of significance in favor of a stark picture of failure and waste, and words like brutal only scrape the surface of this chilling sensation.flyonthewall2983 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2019 10:47 amPesci's last scenes really may have stuck out among everything else, which is no small feat considering the brilliance of everyone else from De Niro and Pacino on down to Jesse Plemons and Anna Paquin. But there was something about seeing him in the wheelchair and being so convincing in the old-age makeup and the wheel chair and talking without his teeth, that really spoke to me about how death gets us all, even the ones we find intimidating in life.