165 Man Bites Dog
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
- Location: all up in thurr
165 Man Bites Dog
Man Bites Dog
Documentary filmmakers Andre and Remy have found an ideal subject in Ben. He is witty, sophisticated, intelligent, well liked--and a serial killer. As Andre and Remy document Ben's routines, they become increasingly entwined in his vicious program, sacrificing their objectivity and their morality. Controversial winner of the International Critics' Prize at the 1992 Cannes Film Festival, Man Bites Dog stunned audiences worldwide with its unflinching imagery and biting satire of media violence.
Special Features
- New digital transfer, enhanced for widescreen televisions
- 1993 video interview with the filmmakers
- No C4 for Daniel-Daniel, a student short by the filmmakers
- Stills gallery
- Theatrical trailer
- New and improved English subtitle translation
- Optimal image quality: RSDL dual-layer edition
Criterionforum.org user rating averages
Feature currently disabled
Documentary filmmakers Andre and Remy have found an ideal subject in Ben. He is witty, sophisticated, intelligent, well liked--and a serial killer. As Andre and Remy document Ben's routines, they become increasingly entwined in his vicious program, sacrificing their objectivity and their morality. Controversial winner of the International Critics' Prize at the 1992 Cannes Film Festival, Man Bites Dog stunned audiences worldwide with its unflinching imagery and biting satire of media violence.
Special Features
- New digital transfer, enhanced for widescreen televisions
- 1993 video interview with the filmmakers
- No C4 for Daniel-Daniel, a student short by the filmmakers
- Stills gallery
- Theatrical trailer
- New and improved English subtitle translation
- Optimal image quality: RSDL dual-layer edition
Criterionforum.org user rating averages
Feature currently disabled
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm
Stephen Holden's original review from the New York Times:
How can "Man Bites Dog" affect the escalating level of violence in the movies and on television? Is it part of the problem or the solution? Or is it merely a sensationalistic cinematic prank unworthy of serious discussion? Such debate is likely to be stirred up by the Belgian movie's New York Film Festival screenings this evening at 6:15 and tomorrow at midnight in Alice Tully Hall.
Two things can safely be said about this pseudo-documentary of a serial killer, which won the International Critics' Prize earlier this year at the Cannes Film Festival. The film, directed and co-written by its three young producers, who also appear in it, is jam-packed with graphic violence. And its gun-toting, speed-rapping subject, Ben (Benoit Poelvoorde), has the edgy charisma of James Woods in one of his more maniacal star turns.
In the film's opening moments, Ben is shown accosting a woman in a railway car, forcing her into a compartment and biting at her coat like a mad dog. The sequence is funny in a Dadaist sort of way. Moments later, Ben is exuberantly explaining to the camera how much weight in water human corpses of different ages are likely to take on when thrown off a bridge.
A complete exhibitionist, he boasts of being nicknamed "the octopus" for his ability to wiggle so many different parts of his body independently of one another, and offers a demonstration. He has no qualms about being filmed throwing up in a restaurant after ingesting some tainted mussels. To the accompaniment of mock-pastoral fantasy sequences, he proudly recites his own ghastly romantic verses.
But the character is also casually, viciously racist and xenophobic. One of his first murders is of a black night watchman, whose trousers he unzips while titteringly inspecting the size of the man's genitals. Ben murders both for sport and for money. Forcing his way into an old woman's apartment on the pretext of doing a television interview about loneliness and old age, he puts a gun to her head, screams, "Granny snuff!" and scares her to death. He knew he wouldn't have to shoot, he boasts afterward, because on entering her apartment, he spied her heart medication. Seconds later, he has plucked her life savings from under a mattress and gleefully waved them at the camera.
As the killing spree intensifies, it becomes clear that the two-man camera crew attending Ben at all times is not about to step in and stop the violence. In fact, they are active collaborators who help prepare the action. More than that, it is their mere presence that incites him to new levels of virtuosic savagery. When Ben methodically slaughters a well-to-do couple and their little boy in their suburban home, at his instruction the sound man obligingly moves in to record the crunch of a neck being broken. The film's most disturbing scene graphically depicts a rape as well as a double murder.
"Man Bites Dog," which was filmed in grainy black-and-white and has the jerky momentum of cinema-verite, is a grisly sick joke of a film that some will find funny, others simply appalling. On one level, it is an in-joke about movie making, since one reason given for Ben's rampage is the need to steal enough money to make the documentary.
On another level, the film satirizes real-life television shows that purport to take viewers into the thick of the action. It suggests how profoundly the presence of the camera affects events, and thumbs its nose at the very notion of documentary objectivity. In one of the film's most blatant bits of satire, a film crew member shot in the line of duty is mawkishly eulogized by his surviving partner.
"Man Bites Dog" is not the only selection in this year's film festival to find a causal relationship between television and movie violence and real-life homicide. The Austrian film "Benny's Video" explores similar notions with an icy elegance that is the stylistic opposite of the semi-improvised freneticism of "Man Bites Dog."
Although "Benny's Video" pushes its pessimism a bit too insistently, it is the more resonant of the two films. "Man Bites Dog," by contrast, gets carried away with its own cleverness. It makes the audience the butt of a nasty practical joke.
-
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:49 am
According to the Hollywood Reporter (by way of the BBC), Remy Balveaux has died
- Lemmy Caution
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 am
- Location: East of Shanghai
- Mr Sausage
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Canada
No use cluttering up this thread when we have a perfectly good thread dedicated entirely to this subject right here.According to the Hollywood Reporter (by way of the BBC), Remy Balveaux has died
Last edited by Mr Sausage on Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Lemmy Caution
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 am
- Location: East of Shanghai
With two posts in a year and a half, I assume you are joking about cluttering up the thread.
I would have thought Man Bites Dog would have generated alot more conversation (unless it already did elsewhere). it is a deliberately provocative film, dealing with the ways in which we are fascinated by violence, how the media prostitutes itself for a story with few ethical cocnerns, and even a parody of how difficult it is to finance a film and find an interseting subject.
I thought this was near genius, though it might get a little repetitive. I haven't re-watched it yet, because the first go-round lodged in my head so thoroughly. Also, it is a little bit of a deep immersion experience that one needs to be up for. Lastly, I'm mildly worried that it won't hold up as well on a second viewing.
Has anyone gone in for repeat viewings of MBD? Thoughts?
I would have thought Man Bites Dog would have generated alot more conversation (unless it already did elsewhere). it is a deliberately provocative film, dealing with the ways in which we are fascinated by violence, how the media prostitutes itself for a story with few ethical cocnerns, and even a parody of how difficult it is to finance a film and find an interseting subject.
I thought this was near genius, though it might get a little repetitive. I haven't re-watched it yet, because the first go-round lodged in my head so thoroughly. Also, it is a little bit of a deep immersion experience that one needs to be up for. Lastly, I'm mildly worried that it won't hold up as well on a second viewing.
Has anyone gone in for repeat viewings of MBD? Thoughts?
- pauling
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:04 pm
- Location: St. Paul, MN
-
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:43 am
- arsonfilms
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:53 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
I'm very fond of breaking this one out when I have company and somebody suggests watching a "comedy."
Although there are other films in the collection I would sooner classify as favorites, I have to admit that this is one of the ones I've watched the most. It was fairly unnerving the first time I saw it, but every viewing after just got funnier and funnier, but the tension stays intact. It truly is a great film.
Although there are other films in the collection I would sooner classify as favorites, I have to admit that this is one of the ones I've watched the most. It was fairly unnerving the first time I saw it, but every viewing after just got funnier and funnier, but the tension stays intact. It truly is a great film.
- Mr Sausage
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Canada
- Lemmy Caution
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 am
- Location: East of Shanghai