1175 Inland Empire

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#501 Post by yoloswegmaster » Wed Sep 08, 2021 5:06 pm

A page for Inland Empire has been added to the Janus site

User avatar
senseabove
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:07 am

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#502 Post by senseabove » Wed Sep 08, 2021 7:38 pm

"See, not everything really needs a UHD release."

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Inland Empire

#503 Post by colinr0380 » Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:07 am

Big Ben wrote:
Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:12 pm
Laura Dern did a an interview a few months ago where she talked very briefly about Inland Empire and that it "was coming from Criterion or something." This discussion revolved around a filmed monologue or something she did with the implication that the initial test or whatever would be on the disc. Rabbits too would no doubt be on there as well.
I wonder if that would be an early version of the monologue talking about the character's past to a non-speaking investigator figure (NSFW: Language).

The most important thing about an Inland Empire release (apart from it being in UHD of course :wink: ) is that it will hopefully have "More Things That Happened" on there, which is a collection of deleted scenes turned into a second almost feature length piece that is just as good as (if not better than) the main film. More Things That Happened feels like a wonderful piece in which to spend longer luxuriating in the Lynchian atmosphere without any concession to having to think about the demands of narrative propulsion, such as there was in Inland Empire, at all.


User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#505 Post by tenia » Thu Mar 10, 2022 2:36 am

This makes 0 sense.
First to downscale the HD upscale instead of just, well, using directly the SD footage.
And then to upscale this to 4k.

User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:22 am

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#506 Post by Never Cursed » Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:04 am

That account is super jokey, is there a source on what they're saying there?

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#507 Post by yoloswegmaster » Thu Mar 10, 2022 7:31 am

They are also claiming that the Quinoa extra has been upscaled by AI:
The quinoa footage was also upscaled to UHD/4K in Topaz Lab's Gigapixel AI software with a new 5.1 sound mix by recent Screen Slate contributor Dean Hurley.

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#508 Post by Drucker » Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:07 am

I concede I haven’t yet seen if this is verified anywhere.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#509 Post by hearthesilence » Thu Mar 10, 2022 10:15 am

Regardless, we have the cheap UK BD as a fallback if they wind up botching this.

User avatar
dekadetia
was Born Innocent
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#510 Post by dekadetia » Thu Mar 10, 2022 10:48 am

True or not, this has me curious to feed a segment of the Absurda SD release to Topaz just to see what effect it has. I've been playing around with this software for a while and the results can be interesting in situations where no better alternative exists. They're different enough from the source, though, that one would certainly be wise to not sell off previous editions.

User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#511 Post by Finch » Thu Mar 10, 2022 10:54 am

If this turns out to be correct, hopefully Lynch will let them include the original theatrical presentation too. The description above makes me think of the horrid Lumiere and Melies in 4k 60fps uploads to Youtube.

User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#512 Post by Roger Ryan » Thu Mar 10, 2022 11:17 am

That comment regarding the restoration of the "Quinoa" extra and remixing it to 5.1 does feel like a joke.

As you can see, most of this informal segment is shot in near complete darkness and the audio is just Lynch talking with a moody synth as a music bed (sure, I guess you could have the synth track swirling around the viewer if you wanted, but the current stereo mix does the job fine for what it's worth).

User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#513 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop » Thu Mar 10, 2022 11:39 am

The Quinoa post is obviously a joke, but the other one seems serious. From my understanding, miniDV doesn’t hold very well and is starting to deteriorate from tapes of that era. Additionally, the HDCAM master is probably the one used for color grading which was then transferred to 35mm for most theatrical viewings (I know I saw it as such back in the day). I’m more curious about the tech specifics and process and how that will effect the viewing. The Sony cameras used on the film shoot at 29.97fps, so some sort of wizardry had to be done to convert it to 24fps for film or 23.97fps for HDCAM. But I would not be concerned about the image looking like those 4K/60fps Lumiere clips. At the end of the day, it’s still miniDV and you’re working with the limitations of that. I assume the transfer has more to do with the look of and fidelity of the video format than anything else. I never got rid of my old Absurda DVD of this, so I’m curious to see how it compares.

User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#514 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian » Thu Mar 10, 2022 12:22 pm

The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:
Thu Mar 10, 2022 11:39 am
I’m more curious about the tech specifics and process and how that will effect the viewing. The Sony cameras used on the film shoot at 29.97fps, so some sort of wizardry had to be done to convert it to 24fps for film or 23.97fps for HDCAM.
American Cinematographer ran an article back in the day that covers those specifics:
SpoilerShow
These [MiniDV] tapes were up-converted to 16x9 24p HD through a Snell & Wilcox Alchemist Platinum and laid off to D-5. “With 60i footage, you’ve got 60 real fields,” notes Broderson. “Every field is adjacent to the next and they all have motion. So if you just remove the extra frames, you get an obvious stutter, and if you just blend them all together, you get a very soft look. The Alchemist uses a sophisticated motion algorithm to make everything look smooth in 24p.”

An online HD conform was completed from the D-5 tapes on an Avid DS Nitris, using Lynch’s DV tapes as a guide track, along with EDLs from his edit. “Everything was captured nonlinear with the Nitris,” says Broderson. “Within that environment, we did a lot of fixes, like motion stabilizing and paintboxing, along with the editing. The ability to do that is a big advantage over a linear online system.” The final Nitris conform was output to Sony HDCam SR tapes.

The color correction was completed tape-to-tape in a da Vinci 2K suite by FotoKem colorist George Koran. “David made the decision to do a tape-to-tape correction rather than a digital intermediate [DI],” says Koran. “He comes from the film telecine world, so he’s used to the terminology; he knows what to ask for and what we can do. We tried a lot of different looks and densities. David let me play with colors, and I would come up with suggestions. For example, on the Poland sequences, we went for a heavy Tobacco-filter look, almost a rust color. We also applied some grads to darken the top portion of the frame.”

[...]

Koran used a Teranex box to enhance the image quality from the HD up-conversion. “In my suite, I can program the Teranex from shot to shot, adjusting the sensitivity of the noise reduction and changing the aperture to increase the sharpness. We’re also able to smooth out the inherent grain of DV, but you have to be careful to avoid artifacts. You can easily go too far with sharpening, and then it starts to look artificial. We created a pretty good group of presets for the movie during our initial tests.”

Inland Empire was recorded to 35mm on Arrilaser recorders from two HDCam SR tapes at 1920x1080. “First, we took the final tapes into our DI suite and applied a custom look-up table [LUT] that was designed to make HD material look right on film,” explains Broderson. “In the DI suite, we could screen digitally — with the LUT applied — using a Digital Projection 2K DLP projector. We’d then record it with the Arri and look at the film version. David watched the digital and film projections, and he thought the match was spot-on.” The final output was made on Kodak Vision Premier 2393.
The article also states that the DVD master was made from HDCAM, not 35mm.

User avatar
Forrest Taft
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:34 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway

Re: Janus Films

#515 Post by Forrest Taft » Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:12 pm

Big Ben wrote:
Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:12 pm
Laura Dern did a an interview a few months ago where she talked very briefly about Inland Empire and that it "was coming from Criterion or something." This discussion revolved around a filmed monologue or something she did with the implication that the initial test or whatever would be on the disc. Rabbits too would no doubt be on there as well.
Would be fun if the original Rabbits-episodes were included. There were three series on davidlynch.com: Dumbland, Rabbits, and the always forthcoming Axxon N, the latter I assume morphed into this movie. Would love to know more about Axxon N, and if any of it was ever completed in it's original form, it would make for a great inclusion. I very much doubt it will happen, though. As long as they port the extras from the original Absurda DVD, I won't complain.

User avatar
Roscoe
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Janus Films

#516 Post by Roscoe » Thu Mar 10, 2022 4:21 pm

Forrest Taft wrote:
Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:12 pm
Would be fun if the original Rabbits-episodes were included.
I'd buy the INLAND EMPIRE release to get RABBITS, if nothing else.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#517 Post by therewillbeblus » Thu Mar 10, 2022 6:04 pm

If Criterion is playing it as safely in the realm of political correctness as they seem to be these days, I doubt we're ever getting Dumbland

User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#518 Post by Finch » Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:08 am

More screenshots from the new version at Blu-Ray.com

Since the Studio Canal/Optimum Blu-Ray has a different grading than the Rhino/Absurda DVD which Lynch reportedly supervised himself, we can forget about the UK DVD and Blu-Ray for any meaningful comparison. The grading of the new CC BD should be more like the Absurda disc.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#519 Post by hearthesilence » Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:40 pm

WOW. I'm impressed there was that much more detail in the DV tapes. On the other hand, it's more likely that says more about the poor job Studio Canal/Optimum did on their BD.

User avatar
TraverseTown
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:38 am

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#520 Post by TraverseTown » Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:46 pm

hearthesilence wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:40 pm
WOW. I'm impressed there was that much more detail in the DV tapes. On the other hand, it's more likely that says more about the poor job Studio Canal/Optimum did on their BD.
I'm no expert but isn't it more likely that that level of detail in the new screencaps is sort of artificially created through the AI upscaling, rather than being inherent to the source tapes?

User avatar
soundchaser
Leave Her to Beaver
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:32 am

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#521 Post by soundchaser » Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:50 pm

TraverseTown wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:46 pm
hearthesilence wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:40 pm
WOW. I'm impressed there was that much more detail in the DV tapes. On the other hand, it's more likely that says more about the poor job Studio Canal/Optimum did on their BD.
I'm no expert but isn't it more likely that that level of detail in the new screencaps is sort of artificially created through the AI upscaling, rather than being inherent to the source tapes?
It sure looks like it to my eyes. The shot of Grace Zabriskie does not resemble typical miniDV noise to me.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#522 Post by hearthesilence » Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:14 pm

I thought it had more to do with the sensor rather than the recording format? Like whether it's SD or an HD camera, if the sensor is actually capable of grabbing more info than what it's actually recording, you'll see a huge improvement compared to a camera that's incapable of doing that. I know I've seen it with an HD camera capturing to SD vs. a standard DV cam and even with a camera that reportedly had a sensor that was like 4K outputting to HD vs standard HD cams. (The model names escape me.)

User avatar
dekadetia
was Born Innocent
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#523 Post by dekadetia » Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:51 pm

TraverseTown wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:46 pm
I'm no expert but isn't it more likely that that level of detail in the new screencaps is sort of artificially created through the AI upscaling, rather than being inherent to the source tapes?
This is almost certainly correct. That's why you're seeing it really excel on things like faces in closeup, hair, patterned cloth, etc. -- the AI has a better sense of what those things are and what should be there. Note the wide shot with the rabbit costume in it benefits comparatively little. And it does also look like artificial grain has been added to keep things like skin from looking too plasticine.

User avatar
soundchaser
Leave Her to Beaver
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:32 am

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#524 Post by soundchaser » Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:58 pm

hearthesilence wrote:
Mon Mar 14, 2022 2:14 pm
I thought it had more to do with the sensor rather than the recording format? Like whether it's SD or an HD camera, if the sensor is actually capable of grabbing more info than what it's actually recording, you'll see a huge improvement compared to a camera that's incapable of doing that. I know I've seen it with an HD camera capturing to SD vs. a standard DV cam and even with a camera that reportedly had a sensor that was like 4K outputting to HD vs standard HD cams. (The model names escape me.)
Yes, but also no. The sensor on the camcorder can certainly make a difference, particularly in low light settings, but miniDV has its own form of compression built in to the tape. Lynch used a fairly standard DV camera on Inland Empire — it really should look like (artfully composed) miniDV.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Forthcoming: Inland Empire

#525 Post by hearthesilence » Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:02 pm

If the new detail is artificially fabricated, I guess I'll have to wait for some video to get released, just to see how the integrity of the work holds up (i.e. when faces move, do the details move with it seamlessly or does something look off)

Post Reply