colinr0380 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 1:29 am
(for an example of how this can work the other way too, you are pretty much never going to get anything but the most positive comments from Mark Kermode on The Exorcist, The Wicker Man or Local Hero, even if others may potentially have reservations, so he'd be the obvious go-to guy to talk about them because you know its a pretty safe bet that he's not going to surprisingly turn around after decades of being a vocal supporter and shockingly say how terrible the films now are, or something equally out of leftfield. Though maybe he'd have some tangential comments on Exorcist II, Gregory's Two Girls or The Wicker Tree that would need to be cut out? But I would assume that if he had such opinions he would probably tactfully skirt around them unless forced to tackle such films head on!), but I can see why it can be frowned at if its just personal foibles being presented as cold, hard 'truths'.
Reminds me if this vulgar display of kermodeness
https://youtu.be/KH_0dS1d3X8
For one thing, it's funny that he accuses of Boorman of being pretentious and above genre films, when he himself fetishizes and endlessly brands himself on the most "respectable" horror film of them all (after Rosemary's Baby and The Shining) and seems to like only those Boorman films which conform to the dominant aesthetic ideology... New Hollywood, shot by Vilmos Zsigmond, etc.