300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

Discuss releases by Indicator and the films on them.

Moderator: MichaelB

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Maltic
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 1:36 am

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#201 Post by Maltic » Thu Jun 16, 2022 4:49 pm

Stefan Andersson wrote:
Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:23 pm
The Undercover Man
5 Against the House
The Lineup
The Mob
Murder by Contract
City of Fear
The Dark Past
Pushover
The Brothers Rico
Good, but you left out my favourites: Drive a Crooked Road and Tight Spot (The Dark Past, on the other hand..)

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#202 Post by MichaelB » Sun Jun 19, 2022 8:03 am

Final specs for the Bogart box:

Image

Dead Reckoning:

Image


Knock On Any Door:

Image

Tokyo Joe:

Image

Sirocco:

Image

The Family Secret:

Image

The Harder They Fall:

Image

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#203 Post by MichaelB » Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:53 am

CineSavant digs deep into the Bogart box.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#204 Post by MichaelB » Sat Jul 02, 2022 10:13 am

…as does CineOutsider, in even more detail.

MikeFH
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2019 5:26 pm

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#205 Post by MikeFH » Mon Aug 01, 2022 2:30 pm

.

Just wondering… No Three Stooges shorts as extras anymore? Love them.

.

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#206 Post by tenia » Mon Aug 01, 2022 3:59 pm

None on this fifth boxset, no.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#207 Post by MichaelB » Tue Aug 02, 2022 3:40 pm

There won't be any more. Sony's decision, not Powerhouse's.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#208 Post by therewillbeblus » Sat Nov 12, 2022 6:21 pm

Finally making my way through these sets, and grateful to report that Drive a Crooked Road finally won me over. Quine crafts nothing short of a courageous meditation on loneliness, unafraid to slow down to a painful pace of inertia, forcing us to dwell in the dissonance between our isolated protagonist and the people manipulating his emotional vulnerability, entirely observed from from an appropriately uncomfortable objective distance. It’s in the generous space allotted to these attentive details that the film becomes admirably empathetic and compassionate, while never sacrificing the fatalistic realism of the motivational pull of individualistic drives. What a sad, raw, barely-empowering ending too- an exhibition of actionable compromise and yet uncompromising dedication to character.

The Lineup was a fun bit of nastiness with striking visual prowess and forward momentum, and the rest of the first set was varying degrees of fine- exempting 5 Against the House. I can’t understand why it even exists, and who for.

Framed was a pleasant surprise. It’s nothing special plot-wise, but commits itself to a strong script of narrative withholding, especially in its restrained establishment of faint character and motive. I appreciated the prioritized focus on fleshing out small moments of geniality and vulnerability, with organically minute and ordinary interactions between several dyads of people, informing unnecessarily (but welcome) intricate characterization that still managed to remain implicit rather than fully explicit. The narrative trajectory favors melodrama and mystery over typically suspense-based constructions of noir unveilings. This doesn’t mean anything particularly unexpected happens, but the sensation of mystery formally matches the alienated states of the characters from one another’s motives and plans via informational gatekeeping, and is quite effective in its dedication to this consistent approach.

I enjoyed how the protagonist is a little more wise to suspicion than usual, and the femme fatale is a more ‘realistic’ small town girl-next-door type rather than an oozing individualist pretending to be a submissive dependent. Janis Carter is the MVP here, and sells the femme fatale’s poker face through embracing her character’s socially-informed unsuspecting type as she may be diagnosed in real life, divorced from a cinematic role and consequently far more convincingly nebulous. Ford portrays a more perceptive and intelligent fall-guy, actualizing sober skills we’d hope to be able to locate if placed into a similar position ourselves, half-blind to duplicity and half-aware that something is not quite right, with enough self-preservation to investigate unbound from deterministic id functions.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#209 Post by therewillbeblus » Sun Dec 04, 2022 9:20 pm

I'm clearly not the audience for The Sniper, so any boundary-pushing interest in Arthur Franz' titular antihero mostly washed over me. However, I got a kick out of how anti-civilian this movie is. Just when one feels conflicted between seeing the other'ing common folk as either frustratingly boring or a welcome reprieve or boring, when filtered through our surrogate Franz' inability to relate to people in any normal way, we get Frank Faylen's inspector, who clearly loathes ordinary citizens from a position of supreme value in the eyes of the film. They come across like Paparazzo in the final act, and his line, "People, get your heads out of your windows" is so unmistakably a glorious Code-taunting "get your heads out of your asses" plant, after all the shade he's thrown at them just prior to this moment (plus, well, the whole movie), that I found myself awestruck with glee at how Dmytryk got away with such an implicit Fuck You on multiple levels (to the censors, and the audience of civilians). I'm not sure if The Sniper really winds up being successful as a pro-cops propaganda film, but I do enjoy the blatant condescension that comes with that part of it. It's just so inconsistent with its split focus; toeing the line between fear and sympathy for Franz and also hyping up the police force, leaving ordinary people at the bottom of the totem pole of interest, which seems like a curious and insipid choice if you're not going to take that idea all the way.

User avatar
reaky
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:53 am
Location: Cambridge, England

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#210 Post by reaky » Sat Jun 17, 2023 6:54 am

The screenplay is barely more than a one-line plot synopsis, but what gives the 50s nuke-noir City of Fear distinction is Lucien Ballard’s location-heavy cinematography and an early Jerry Goldsmith score. Mark Ruffalo is a startling lookalike of star Vince Edwards.

User avatar
reaky
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:53 am
Location: Cambridge, England

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#211 Post by reaky » Mon Jul 17, 2023 2:23 pm

TOKYO JOE is plainly an attempt to rehash Casablanca in post-war Japan (Bogie even calls his European love interest “kid”), but the screenplay is digressive and plodding. It certainly left an impression on Bryan Ferry, though - having written 2HB for Bogart, he later released a single called Tokyo Joe, and These Foolish Things (title track of his first solo album) gets played to death.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#212 Post by knives » Fri Aug 11, 2023 11:54 am

Can’t find a better place to post this, but what’s the deal with the horse in Saved by the Belle? That’s a pretty crazy gag.

Also incidentally, it’s fun finding out how many major figures worked on the Three Stooges. Lucien Ballard DPed so many of these.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#213 Post by domino harvey » Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:37 pm

Caught up with the Family Secret and found it a peculiar oddity. Tonally, this is straight-up melodrama with no real noir elements in practice even if the plot set-up sounds otherwise (which also explains why I'd never even heard of it before this box). I found the disconnect between Derek's actions and the amount of time spent by the film humanizing him via his romantic machinations towards his secretary a little much to swallow, especially in the sequences where he gets full on rapey. But I also perversely enjoyed the scenes between these two for how out of step they are with the film itself. I think the eventual payoff here is absurd, even for Hollywood, as truly by the time Derek decides to the do the right thing, he 100% only does it because it selfishly serves himself yet again and yet the film tries to paint it as selfless. I think not.

User avatar
ikms
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:18 pm
Location: Japan

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#214 Post by ikms » Thu Dec 21, 2023 7:29 am

The new Indicator Cast Podcast has an interview with Sam Dunn and John Morrissey where they reveal the new deal for another 60 Columbia titles that will take seven years to release - more Joan Crawford, more Hammer, but also "there will be more noir sets" (plural!). Best guess, light green then violet?

User avatar
TMDaines
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:01 pm
Location: Stretford, Manchester

Re: 300-329 Columbia Noir #1-5

#215 Post by TMDaines » Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:02 pm

I'm guessing those Kit Parker sets might become a little more redundant.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#216 Post by MichaelB » Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:19 am

Bumped to flag up the announcement of Columbia Noir #6, in the first post of this thread.

There are also YouTube previews of The Whistler and The Power of the Whistler.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#217 Post by domino harvey » Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:40 am

I watched all eight of these last fall. Glad they were able to figure out the rights to the title missing from Mill Creek’s set so that it’s complete. These are not particularly good films, but most of them are watchable and a couple are okay— not really a compelling defense, but I’ll be picking it up. Plus, you’ll certainly see a lot more Dix than you ever thought possible!

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#218 Post by MichaelB » Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:41 am

domino harvey wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:40 am
but you’ll certainly see a lot more Dix than you ever thought possible
We are not talking nude. I really cannot stress this enough.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#219 Post by domino harvey » Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:46 am

Joking aside, watching these films in close quarters gives a former star turned c-string studio player with limited abilities an oddly endearing and comforting quality by the end of it. When you get to the entry without him, you really do miss him!

User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#220 Post by ryannichols7 » Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:47 am

I probably should finally go through boxes 1-5 already...grabbing them at the time I did was obviously smart, but I'm seriously due to go through them and all their commentaries

User avatar
ikms
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:18 pm
Location: Japan

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#221 Post by ikms » Fri Feb 16, 2024 9:12 am

ryannichols7 wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:47 am
I probably should finally go through boxes 1-5 already...grabbing them at the time I did was obviously smart, but I'm seriously due to go through them and all their commentaries
By sheer inertia even if set #10 spotlights "romantic comedies by NOIR stars" I'd still feel obligated to pick it up. Surfing a endless wave of LE releases, the actual hobby seems to be programming a hypothetical film season stretching into my dotage, but on the bright side it means I'll get around to some in time for their hundredth. :oops:

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#222 Post by MichaelB » Fri Feb 16, 2024 12:55 pm

ikms wrote:
Fri Feb 16, 2024 9:12 am
By sheer inertia even if set #10 spotlights "romantic comedies by NOIR stars"
<takes notes>

User avatar
What A Disgrace
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: 300-329; 354-357 Columbia Noir #1-6

#223 Post by What A Disgrace » Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:44 pm

I thought the Bogie box was the worst one, this might be even worse but at least it'll be more interesting, and will actually include The Whislter in all of the films.

Post Reply