To the Wonder (Terrence Malick, 2013)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

To the Wonder (Terrence Malick, 2013)

#1 Post by Jeff » Fri Aug 13, 2010 4:09 am

The suddenly prolific Terrence Malick is scheduled to begin production on his next film the first week in October.

rs98762001
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:04 pm

Re: The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2010)

#2 Post by rs98762001 » Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:03 pm

Ben Affleck is acting in a Malick movie, which means hell must have officially frozen over.

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2010)

#3 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:34 pm

Look at it this way, he won't talk as much as he usually does.

User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2010)

#4 Post by Cold Bishop » Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:49 pm

After Richard Gere and Colin Farrell, why are people still complaining about Malick's use of questionable actors?

User avatar
MyNameCriterionForum
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am

Re: The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2010)

#5 Post by MyNameCriterionForum » Sat Aug 14, 2010 2:53 am

We can assume Affleck will be in his 60s when the film is finally shot and released, yes? So he has time to hone his craft.

User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:48 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2011)

#6 Post by Oedipax » Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:00 pm

Whatever the status of Tree of Life may be, it appears Malick's new film has begun production.

User avatar
MyNameCriterionForum
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am

Re: Untitled Terrence Malick Film (Terrence Malick, Eventual

#7 Post by MyNameCriterionForum » Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:33 pm

There seems to be, already, more factual info leaking about this project than about Tree of Life. And the local press in OK don't seem to shy about publicizing it (just one of many recent examples).

On location

my experience in bartlesville

Untitled film starring Ben Affleck shot in downtown Pawhuska

Many pics (several of Malick -- jeez but that dude rocks the Hawaiian shirts) at the link, long article, this probably won't be released until BluRay is superceded by the next format

Cde.
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:56 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Untitled Terrence Malick Film (Terrence Malick, Eventual

#8 Post by Cde. » Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:49 pm

Allegedly titled The Burial

And now IMDB are calling it by that title.
Time for a thread title change?

User avatar
MyNameCriterionForum
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#9 Post by MyNameCriterionForum » Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:06 am

first off - the film is NOT titled The Burial

That being said, it does have more to do with Javier Burdem's priest character, his conflict with his faith and his love for a female lead.
Terrence Malick BLOG

j99
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 10:18 am

Re: The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2010)

#10 Post by j99 » Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:43 am

Cold Bishop wrote:After Richard Gere and Colin Farrell, why are people still complaining about Malick's use of questionable actors?
Gere was acceptable in Days Of Heaven, but Farrell in The New World, disastrous.
We can assume Affleck will be in his 60s when the film is finally shot and released, yes? So he has time to hone his craft.
Excellent!

User avatar
MyNameCriterionForum
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#11 Post by MyNameCriterionForum » Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:51 am

Exclusive: Details on Terrence Malick's Untitled Drama Revealed

No space vampires this time... but possibly ghosts!

User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#12 Post by Cold Bishop » Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:59 am

But if Hong Kong has taught us anything, it's that ghosts can be vampires too. Hope still remains.

User avatar
MyNameCriterionForum
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#13 Post by MyNameCriterionForum » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:13 pm

New (or first?) photo, not much to speak of really. Affleck looks dim and douchey as always; I have no idea who any of the females in this film are, never heard of any of them.

Image

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#14 Post by domino harvey » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:19 pm

Someone hasn't had a mainstream girlfriend!


User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#16 Post by Jeff » Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:29 pm


Giap
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:09 am

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#17 Post by Giap » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:03 pm

2012?! He's turning into a veritable Woody Allen.

Grand Illusion
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:56 am

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, 2012)

#18 Post by Grand Illusion » Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:17 am

Woody has a better grasp on philosophy.

User avatar
sidehacker
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:49 am
Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
Contact:

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, 2012)

#19 Post by sidehacker » Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:39 am

Grand Illusion wrote:Woody has a better grasp on philosophy.
Please tell me this is sarcasm.

jojo
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:47 pm

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, 2012)

#20 Post by jojo » Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:46 pm

Maybe (hopefully?) Affleck will only be in the film for about 15 minutes, much like Penn in Tree of Life. ;)

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, 2012)

#21 Post by domino harvey » Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:53 pm

Spoiler: He's the one being buried

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#22 Post by mfunk9786 » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:45 pm

MyNameCriterionForum wrote:New (or first?) photo, not much to speak of really. Affleck looks dim and douchey as always; I have no idea who any of the females in this film are, never heard of any of them.

Image
You've never heard of Rachel McAdams?

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, 2012)

#23 Post by matrixschmatrix » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:53 pm

That is a weird usage of 'female' (instead of, say, 'women') that seems to pop up. Is there any particular intentionality behind that? I mean, we're clear that they're all female humans, and not say gibbons, right?

User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, 2012)

#24 Post by Brian C » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:06 pm

Was a joke anyway, right? I mean, if nothing else, besides McAdams and Weisz he must have heard of Jessica Chastain, who starred in the last Malick movie.

What the point of the joke was, I couldn't say, but the statement makes no sense at face value so something must be up.

User avatar
MyNameCriterionForum
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am

Re: The Burial (Terrence Malick, Eventually)

#25 Post by MyNameCriterionForum » Thu Sep 08, 2011 1:54 pm

mfunk9786 wrote:
MyNameCriterionForum wrote:I have no idea who any of the females in this film are, never heard of any of them.
You've never heard of Rachel McAdams?
Sorry, no, not until she was announced for this film.
matrixschmatrix wrote:That is a weird usage of 'female' (instead of, say, 'women') that seems to pop up. Is there any particular intentionality behind that? I mean, we're clear that they're all female humans, and not say gibbons, right?
"intentionality"? "intention" didn't suffice? Do you write artists statements for a living? Are you calling me a misogynist?
Brian C wrote:Was a joke anyway, right? I mean, if nothing else, besides McAdams and Weisz he must have heard of Jessica Chastain, who starred in the last Malick movie.

What the point of the joke was, I couldn't say, but the statement makes no sense at face value so something must be up.
At the time, I don't believe Chastain was officially announced for the film. As for my statement, it was true. Is there some reason you think I'm lying? Is "something up"?

Post Reply