The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 2021)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Message
Author
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#26 Post by mfunk9786 » Thu Mar 28, 2019 8:28 pm

Roscoe wrote:
Thu Mar 28, 2019 8:23 pm
Well, it certainly seems to be a specific take on the roles. Denzel Washington, at age 64, and Frances McDormand at 61.
Certainly helps that life expectancy in 2019 is not 35 years old, provided this is a modern adaptation

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#27 Post by swo17 » Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:35 pm

knives wrote:
Thu Mar 28, 2019 7:31 pm
Isn't that the only bad example though? One rotten egg out of six isn't so bad.
I was only thinking of that and True Grit

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#28 Post by knives » Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:44 pm

Boo to your opinion good sir.

User avatar
dda1996a
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 6:14 am

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#29 Post by dda1996a » Fri Mar 29, 2019 1:43 am

mfunk9786 wrote:
Thu Mar 28, 2019 6:15 pm
Shakespeare is cancelled
No, that's not what I meant, and I see Domino said so himself too. We already have enough Macbeth, Hamlet, Romeo & Juliet, The Tempest, Othello and maybe even King Lear. I'm no Shakespeare expert, but it would be nice seeing some less known work being adapted.

I actually like True Grit, but The Ladykillers is awful and their worst film, irregardless of how much I love the original. Hanks aside it gets nothing right, even moreso when compared to McKendrick's original.

User avatar
NABOB OF NOWHERE
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:30 pm
Location: Brandywine River

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#30 Post by NABOB OF NOWHERE » Fri Mar 29, 2019 2:52 am

Roscoe wrote:
Thu Mar 28, 2019 8:23 pm
Well, it certainly seems to be a specific take on the roles. Denzel Washington, at age 64, and Frances McDormand at 61.
MacBeth!.. He's back and he's mean.

nitin
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:49 am

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#31 Post by nitin » Fri Mar 29, 2019 8:22 am

The Coens’ True Grit is much better than the original film.

User avatar
Slaphappy
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:08 am

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#32 Post by Slaphappy » Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:14 am

Just as I loved John Wayne in True Grit, I think Orson Welles is a hell of a Macbeth, but both of those movies are quite flat on whole and that’s where Coen magic steps in. They know how to tell a story and how to build up characters. I really can’t remember that many Shakespeare adaptations that aren’t just a bunch of scenes stiched together with nice production values. Macbeth deserves better, because the character is all about living a charmed life with lurking sense of doom and how that combination is making him insane. Such a macabre consept should not be handled as one note as the 2015 adaptation. It deserves a Coen treatment.

User avatar
dda1996a
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 6:14 am

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#33 Post by dda1996a » Sat Mar 30, 2019 6:36 am

Slaphappy wrote:
Sat Mar 30, 2019 5:14 am
Just as I loved John Wayne in True Grit, I think Orson Welles is a hell of a Macbeth, but both of those movies are quite flat on whole and that’s where Coen magic steps in. They know how to tell a story and how to build up characters. I really can’t remember that many Shakespeare adaptations that aren’t just a bunch of scenes stiched together with nice production values. Macbeth deserves better, because the character is all about living a charmed life with lurking sense of doom and how that combination is making him insane. Such a macabre consept should not be handled as one note as the 2015 adaptation. It deserves a Coen treatment.
Have you watched any of Kuosawa's Shakespearian films? The only certified adaptation is Throne of Blood, but The Bad Sleep Well and Ran are brilliant as well.

User avatar
Slaphappy
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:08 am

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#34 Post by Slaphappy » Sat Mar 30, 2019 6:47 am

dda1996a wrote:
Sat Mar 30, 2019 6:36 am
Have you watched any of Kuosawa's Shakespearian films? The only certified adaptation is Throne of Blood, but The Bad Sleep Well and Ran are brilliant as well.
I’ve seen Ran and it was very artsy. I really should give Throne of Blood a chance even though I’m usually bored by samurai movies which involve clan intrugue.


User avatar
DarkImbecile
Ask me about my visible cat breasts
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#36 Post by DarkImbecile » Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:27 pm

Joel Coen wrote:I use the language of Shakespeare. I didn’t fuss around or change any of that. The only thing I did, as is common in these adaptations, some more of less, there’s a certain amount of editing. But I would say the movie is about 85% of the language in the play. There’s about 15% which has been cut.
That's really surprising; I had assumed this would be a looser adaptation, somewhere between the play itself and what they did with O Brother, Where Art Thou?.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#37 Post by domino harvey » Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:15 pm

Worth noting that Macbeth is one of Shakespeare’s shortest plays, so retaining 85% of the material will prob still make for a non-epic length adaptation

User avatar
ianthemovie
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:51 am
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#38 Post by ianthemovie » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:24 pm

DarkImbecile wrote:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:27 pm
I had assumed this would be a looser adaptation, somewhere between the play itself and what they did with O Brother, Where Art Thou?.
It sounds like it will be pretty "period" authentic, too, taking place in the 12th century. So for better or worse it won't be Americanized or modernized. (I guess we already have the Coen-inspired Scotland, PA for that anyway.)

User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:22 am

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#39 Post by Never Cursed » Fri Sep 11, 2020 9:16 pm

This wrapped in August under strict COVID-related production protocols. The detailed description of these protocols is interesting, but of particular note at the bottom of the article is the information that the same unit manager will be working on Damien Chazelle's Babylon, set to film at the start of next year

User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#40 Post by aox » Sat Sep 12, 2020 10:52 am

I completely understand that is necessary, but that is insane. The people I know in the film industry (granted on a much smaller scale) and fashion photography have reported similar situations on their sets as well. It really makes for a tense set that creates a slog of a day.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#41 Post by hearthesilence » Sat Sep 12, 2020 11:26 pm

aox wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 10:52 am
I completely understand that is necessary, but that is insane. The people I know in the film industry (granted on a much smaller scale) and fashion photography have reported similar situations on their sets as well. It really makes for a tense set that creates a slog of a day.
With smaller productions (i.e. less people) that have maybe a month left of shooting with their full crew, I think I can understand the gamble of resuming production, especially if they're very strict about sticking to stringent guidelines (as they did on Macbeth - dismissing those who refused to wear masks pretty much set the tone), but until a vaccine's available, personally I think it's too much of a gamble to start up a much larger and longer production from scratch, and that seems to be happening all over the place.

User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#42 Post by aox » Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:06 pm

hearthesilence wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 11:26 pm
aox wrote:
Sat Sep 12, 2020 10:52 am
I completely understand that is necessary, but that is insane. The people I know in the film industry (granted on a much smaller scale) and fashion photography have reported similar situations on their sets as well. It really makes for a tense set that creates a slog of a day.
With smaller productions (i.e. less people) that have maybe a month left of shooting with their full crew, I think I can understand the gamble of resuming production, especially if they're very strict about sticking to stringent guidelines (as they did on Macbeth - dismissing those who refused to wear masks pretty much set the tone), but until a vaccine's available, personally I think it's too much of a gamble to start up a much larger and longer production from scratch, and that seems to be happening all over the place.
Wasn't Paul Schrader only five days from wrapping his shoot of his latest film before it got shut down?

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#43 Post by domino harvey » Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:20 pm

I thought it was even less than that. He finished shooting the remainder a few months ago though

User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:22 am

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#44 Post by Never Cursed » Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:36 pm

He took the opportunity to rewrite some of the principal dialogue scenes in a way he says benefited the film (and I believe him, given how blunt and forthcoming he is about most things, and given how much First Reformed was improved by the on-set finessing of certain scenes).

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#45 Post by FrauBlucher » Sat Jan 16, 2021 7:20 pm


User avatar
Maltic
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 1:36 am

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 202?)

#46 Post by Maltic » Sat Jan 16, 2021 9:33 pm

You wonder if they added cigarette burns and scratches to "make it look like" Welles'


User avatar
Pavel
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2020 2:41 pm

Re: Trailers for Upcoming Films

#48 Post by Pavel » Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:52 am


User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 2021)

#49 Post by Brian C » Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:01 am

Must have been tough to keep everyone six feet apart during filming with all the fog machines obscuring everyone’s view.

User avatar
soundchaser
Leave Her to Beaver
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 12:32 am

Re: The Tragedy of Macbeth (Joel Coen, 2021)

#50 Post by soundchaser » Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:19 am

I know it's only a minute-long teaser, but this sure looks ponderous.

Post Reply