Zack and Miri Make a Porno (Kevin Smith, 2008)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Message
Author
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#26 Post by Tom Hagen » Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:40 pm

jbeall wrote: Seth Rogen dresses up as Kevin Smith to fulfill the latter's fanboy fantasy of sleeping with a woman who's too good-looking to be in his league. How original.
Isn't he already married to a woman who's too good-looking to be in his league, thus fulfilling his fanboy fantasy on a near nightly basis? (A fact that he reminds us all of endlessly in various interviews, appearances, and "Evenings with Kevin Smith" Q&A sessions. Hell he even casts her in his films and has shot semi nude photos of her for Playboy.)

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

#27 Post by swo17 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:46 pm

Just because he keeps saying she is that good looking doesn't mean that she is.

User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#28 Post by Tom Hagen » Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:51 pm

Haha! The question was not "good looking," however. It was "out of his league." His wife surely is not all that he promotes her to be, but she is, unquestionably, out of his league.

User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:22 am
Location: Atlanta-ish

#29 Post by jbeall » Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:01 am

I guess... Skinny-as-a-rail doesn't necessarily equal good-looking in my book, and I've never found his wife all that attractive. But then he's married to her, so his opinion matters a little more than mine.

I could generalize here about folks whose tastes have been changed, probably for the worse, by spending too much time online and too little time interacting with actual people, but that's old hat. What's amusing/sad here is that Smith tries to make his real-life wife into a fantasy object by exploiting her as if she's a fantasy girl, which clearly nobody's buying except Smith himself. Sometimes these comix geeks are worse than frat boys.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#30 Post by Antoine Doinel » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:18 pm

You can stop petitioning the MPAA and finally get some sleep tonight - the film has been given an R-rating on appeal.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

#31 Post by swo17 » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:40 pm

the rating was revised after the group's appeals board viewed the movie.
So are they rating movies now before viewing them?

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

#32 Post by Mr Sausage » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:04 pm

swo17 wrote:
the rating was revised after the group's appeals board viewed the movie.
So are they rating movies now before viewing them?
It was just the Appeals Board that was only now watching it.

User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 6:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

#33 Post by kaujot » Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:52 am

Well, the trailer, for better or worse, looked nothing like a Kevin Smith movie. Except for the familiar faces.

User avatar
chaddoli
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

#34 Post by chaddoli » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:41 am

Couldn't find this thread last night - here's the trailer.

This is the second Weinstein film this year that was directed by no one.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#35 Post by Antoine Doinel » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:43 am

Here's the banned poster (in the US anyway).

Image

And here's a new red band trailer, in which (unsurprisingly) the funniest thing in it is Craig Robinson.

User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#36 Post by Tom Hagen » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:37 am

Wow. That trailer was even less funny than the unfunny teaser a few months back that didn't feature any actual footage from the film. At least Oliver Stone can rest soundly knowing that W. will not be the biggest bomb this fall featuring Elizabeth Banks.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#37 Post by mfunk9786 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:02 am

Antoine Doinel wrote:Here's the banned poster (in the US anyway).

Image
Ugh, what a terrible poster, right down to the two separate colors and the stupid look on Elizabeth Banks' face - aside from the obvious idiocy of the thing.

User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 7:18 pm

#38 Post by tavernier » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:02 am

At least she had to make that face -- Seth Rogen's stupid look comes naturally.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#39 Post by mfunk9786 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:23 pm

It doesn't look anything like either one of them are receiving oral sex at all, too... they're just standing there with photoshopped heads in front of them. Pretty glad it's been banned.

Who would want to lift an idea from this movie, I have no idea, but it brings back horrible memories of:

Image

Although it is quite odd that the Zack and Miri poster would be banned, when this one, featuring a shirtless person making a face like they're proudly being blown, wasn't banned.

As for the trailer... eh. Here's hoping there's a lot of funny improv and riffing, because the faint stench of Smith's stale dialogue is spattered throughout. I still do like Seth Rogen and [to a lesser extent] Elizabeth Banks enough to see this, though.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#40 Post by Antoine Doinel » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:30 pm

mfunk9786 wrote:It doesn't look anything like either one of them are receiving oral sex at all, too... they're just standing there with photoshopped heads in front of them. Pretty glad it's been banned.

Who would want to lift an idea from this movie, I have no idea, but it brings back horrible memories of:

Image
Although, that poster brings back pleasant memories of this one:

Image

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#41 Post by mfunk9786 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:35 pm

Ice cream is delicious.

Noir of the Night
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:57 pm

#42 Post by Noir of the Night » Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:02 pm

Say what you will about Kevin Smith, but this is pretty clever.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

#43 Post by swo17 » Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:18 pm

Noir of the Night wrote:Say what you will about Kevin Smith
I'll bite. Put all of his movies together, and you've still only got about 10% of one good film.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#44 Post by domino harvey » Sat Sep 13, 2008 3:12 pm

That poster is an example of a good idea in theory ruined in execution

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#45 Post by Antoine Doinel » Sat Sep 13, 2008 3:52 pm

I'm guessing we can say the same about the film.

User avatar
dr. calamari
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:55 pm
Location: palookaville

#46 Post by dr. calamari » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:12 am

I'm starting to get the idea that there aren't many Kevin Smith fans on this board, much less in this thread...myself included.

However, I can say that I like Elizabeth Banks without reservation. Too bad she's in this trainwreck, but she's still young enough to recover.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#47 Post by Antoine Doinel » Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:55 pm

Ugh, Kevin Smith can't even make the fake making-of short funny.

User avatar
Mr Pixies
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: Fla
Contact:

#48 Post by Mr Pixies » Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:59 am

I'm a fan of his, but he's hard to defend, or I'm just embarrassed to? This could be good..I like all his others, but the premise and trailer do not interest me (seems like parody of Be Kind Rewind). I'll be there to see it though, and if it does suck, I will assume it is Smith's unconscious way of sabotaging himself to having to make another Jay and Silent Bob film.

Grand Illusion
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:56 am

#49 Post by Grand Illusion » Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:44 am

In fairness to Mr. Smith, if you look at his oeuvre through the looking glass of semiotics and recall what Roland Barthes said about signifiers, then, hey look, Jessica Alba and ice cream. Yum.

User avatar
exte
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: NJ

#50 Post by exte » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:44 pm

Grand Illusion wrote:In fairness to Mr. Smith, if you look at his oeuvre through the looking glass of semiotics and recall what Roland Barthes said about signifiers, then, hey look, Jessica Alba and ice cream. Yum.
lol

Post Reply