Page 41 of 112

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:26 pm
by oldsheperd
I pooped on a cat once.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:27 pm
by jsteffe
jonah.77 wrote:8 1/2 BluRay with commentary track by Max Baucus?
He's no Blue Dog, but I would really love to hear a feature-length commentary on 8 1/2 by Senator James Inhofe. After all, it's a weird European film about a liberal film director/adulterer who's a Catholic, plus it has some of those effeminate types in it. Any chance the folks at Criterion might consider this for their forthcoming Blu-ray edition?

I would also like to make him sit down and watch Salo, but he might confuse it with a documentary about Abu Ghraib and start defending the actions of the patriotic Italians running the facility.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:55 pm
by domino harvey
Only thing better would be a Tom Coburn commentary on 4 Months 3 Weeks 2 Days

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:01 pm
by oldsheperd
Or a Coburn commentary on Vera Drake. A Jim Demint commentary on Gance's Napoleon and Tom Delay on The Band Wagon. No doubt Mark Foley would be in the commentary for Bully

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:22 pm
by Fiery Angel
I'm feeling a thread split comin' on

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:22 pm
by jsteffe
If one is to trust the assertions in Kirby Dick's documentary Outrage (2009), it would also be interesting to somehow trick the Florida governor Charlie Crist into doing a feature-length commentary on Brokeback Mountain or Maurice. The latter could even be a Criterion Collection special edition.

On the other hand, Cruising might be a better choice for Sen. Larry Craig. Just imagine the newsletter clue for that title!

Oh, please stop me before this gets out of hand.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:37 pm
by dr gennesier
8 &1/2 blu-ray with a commentary by Rick (man on Dog) Santorum.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:43 pm
by GringoTex
domino harvey wrote:Only thing better would be a Tom Coburn commentary on 4 Months 3 Weeks 2 Days
No need for a commentary. If Tom Coburn were a filmmaker, he would have made 4 Months 3 Weeks 2 Days.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:10 pm
by Tark
8 1/2 is a "dog" of a film.

They are unhappy they have to release it.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:47 am
by Gregor Samsa
Tark wrote:8 1/2 is a "dog" of a film.

They are unhappy they have to release it.
Maybe they're trying to give it artistic credibillity by releasing it in a two pack with Beethoven?

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:35 am
by Murdoch
Booooo

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:48 am
by Zazou dans le Metro
So if we ever get an animal clue for a forthcoming Rivette what would it be?
My money's on an ox in a ditch.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:50 am
by CSM126
Zazou dans le Metro wrote:So if we ever get an animal clue for a forthcoming Rivette what would it be?
A dead horse.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:26 pm
by Cinephrenic
CSM126 wrote:
Zazou dans le Metro wrote:So if we ever get an animal clue for a forthcoming Rivette what would it be?
A dead horse.
=D>

Or a dead French poodle.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:50 am
by Matango
I'm going with size 8 1/2 Hush Puppies, signifying The Red Shoes.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:01 am
by Feego
Matango wrote:I'm going with size 8 1/2 Hush Puppies, signifying The Red Shoes.
I don't think Moira Shearer's feet were that big. [-(

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:11 pm
by Magic Hate Ball
Feego wrote:
Matango wrote:I'm going with size 8 1/2 Hush Puppies, signifying The Red Shoes.
I don't think Moira Shearer's feet were that big. [-(
Trick photography.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:37 pm
by BWilson
What happened with the clue about Christmas in Monument Valley and everyone thought it was Stagecoach? What did the clue hint at?

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:39 pm
by Napier
It was Stagecoach. And the Kurosawa box.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:23 pm
by colinr0380
Cinephrenic wrote:
CSM wrote:
Zazou dans le Metro wrote:So if we ever get an animal clue for a forthcoming Rivette what would it be?
A dead horse.
Or a dead French poodle.
No, that would mean Criterion were about to release Theatre of Blood!

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:42 pm
by knives
And no one could complain about that.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:08 pm
by swo17
After all the creative newsletter titles they've used for most of their recent releases, I like that the best they could come up with for Howards End was "HOWARDS END in High-Definition."

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:24 am
by manicsounds
How about

"Howard Ends Up in High Def"
or
"Howard's enD"

eh...

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:32 am
by Napier
manicsounds wrote:How about

"Howard Ends Up in High Def"
or
"Howard's enD"

eh...
Exactly! I'm rushing out to buy this now. My insomnia was considered incurable. Until now.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:40 am
by domino harvey
Always think of the parody on The Critic: Howard Stern's End