Page 6 of 104
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:27 am
by Lowry_Sam
SpiderBaby wrote:ianungstad wrote:There is reason to think there's another batch of Fox titles coming with Barton Fink, King of Comedy, Working Girl, Phantom of the Paradise, Beyond the Valley of the Dolls being highly likely for a variety of reasons.
I have been hoping that was the reason Russ Meyer has a phantom page on the site.
No, that page is reserved for
Faster Pussycat, Kill! Kill!. Of the titles being bandied about though, only
Phantom Of Paradise makes me cringe. I regretted picking up the Region 2 blu-ray to pad an order for a "spend over E100 on blu rays & get E50 off" sale on Amazon.fr about 10 minutes into the movie.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:34 am
by Lowry_Sam
hearthesilence wrote:Lowry_Sam wrote:
I asked Mulvaney not too long ago about Life Is Sweet and High Hopes because the Reg. 2 blu-rays were really cheap on Amazon.co.uk & they'd be a likely twofer, but got no response.
FWIW, that Region 2 Blu-Ray is garbage. Allegedly an upscale of an SD master, it's no improvement over the DVD.
...and thanks to diligent reviewers, that is what has kept me from buying them. I really hope this does happen, although I think I'd prefer to see blu rays of
Secrets & Lies and
Happy-Go-Lucky (my 2 Leigh favorites) first.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:42 am
by domino harvey
Well, the Fox Secrets and Lies disc has been OOP for a while, so that seems possible. Happy Go Lucky is Miramax, I think, so either Echo Bridge or Lionsgate for that one
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:59 am
by Lowry_Sam
ianungstad wrote:3:10 to Yuma would certainly be the 1957 original and not the recent remake.
Whichever version it's for, both were just released in 2008 (the 1957 in a "Special Edition" dvd) & both look to be in print & readily available.
So noone else is hoping that man scaling building =
Elevator To The Gallows upgrade?

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:24 am
by duck duck
There is no BLU for the original and the special edition just included a sneak peek at the remake.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:44 am
by Rupert Pupkin
could one of the window (or the fire) be a reference to
I Married A Witch with the lovely Veronica Lake ? [-o<
couldn't one of the window be a reference to one of
La Peau Douce's last scene when Laurence Badie is ask by phone by Lachenay to call his way through the window ? (no no I'm not waiting for this movie on blu since yearssss...

[-o< [-o< [-o< )
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:21 am
by HistoryProf
britcom68 wrote:movielocke wrote:10 drawings = decalogue?
Could each of the ten drawings contain two clues?
Any significance to the grate in the bottom left corner? it stands out as different from the other ornamentation on the first story. I guess the little dot on the bottom of the right door is a keyhole?
?
That "grate" looks like a Charles Addams-basement-flat sort of touch although it may just be an embellishment.
Re: the front doors of the appartment building New Years drawing. It also struck me curious that there was a spot on one of the doors. Or is it a "hole-and-corner." Hole and corner in UK parlance can be translated approximately to "secret" or opposite of above-aboard.
Could this actually be a clue if we follow hole-and-corner to translate to "secret" coupled with the "secret" appearing on the door, which we could interpret to mean "secret door," giving us the title of another Fritz Lang film, Secret Beyond the Door... oh wait, Olive Films just released that! #-o (that line of thinking was terrific though, for a moment)
There is nothing else I can come up with to explain the front door having a single hole on it, unless it was not a clue to begin with, which is always a possibility. Any keyhole explanations out there?
That dot on the bottom of the door has been bugging me as well. It can't be accidental, but I can't for the life of me figure it out. I actually got a few of these on my own for a change too.
If Scanners is coming, the Brood HAS to be as well, no? The latter is my favorite DC film for mostly nostalgic reasons....i've wanted a decent edition of it forever.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:33 am
by beamish13
Anyone hear rumblings of additional MGM titles headed for Criterion? Mike Figgis' LEIBESTRAUM would be great.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:34 am
by TMDaines
criterion10 wrote:Anyone else disappointed that none of these films depicted in the New Year's Drawing are WB titles? Makes me wonder if Badlands really was a one-off deal...
Not at all. As much as the bigger labels have done some decent work with some titles from thr majors, the last thing we need is them releasing more of it and pushing leas well known stuff even further to the side.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:49 am
by knives
The majors own a lot of less known stuff though. There are a number of Warner controlled obscurities worth having in the collection.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:51 am
by Close The Door, Raymond
re: Paul Williams/Diane Keaton/Elaine May-looking person eating candy on 8th floor.
Candy plays a very important role in Rivette's
Celine and Julie Go Boating.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:52 am
by knives
Which is controlled by New Yorker and so won't happen.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:11 am
by Rupert Pupkin
Isabelle Adjani wears some big glasses in the Tenant / Le Locataire - she's supercute in this movie...
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:05 pm
by BillWatkins
Are people sure the naked woman is from Babette's Feast? Could it not also be Helen Mirren in The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover?
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:55 pm
by bamwc2
knives wrote:Which is controlled by New Yorker and so won't happen.
Wow. I was really out of the loop while I was writing my dissertation. I hadn't heard anything about New Yorker's rebirth until I just looked it up.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:36 pm
by Calvin
movielocke wrote:I guess the little dot on the bottom of the right door is a keyhole?
That made me think of Alice in Wonderland. Could it be a hint towards Svankmajer's Alice? The lack of a little door around it would indicate otherwise but I'm just throwing it out there
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:45 pm
by britcom68
Calvin wrote:movielocke wrote:I guess the little dot on the bottom of the right door is a keyhole?
That made me think of Alice in Wonderland. Could it be a hint towards Svankmajer's Alice? The lack of a little door around it would indicate otherwise but I'm just throwing it out there
Re: Alice in Wonderland. I thought the same thing at first, but besides having the wrong door handles for that, the mystery dot/spot isn't an exact keyhole shape, it's just a circle; which rules out Guy Maddin's film "Keyhole" (I hope). The spot might have to be a peephole (don't get excited for a Peeping Tom return however), gun-shot hole, bugging device (the appartment building reminded me vaguely of "Klute"); or possiblly something ala "redrum" in The Shining (also like Gandalf marking Bilbo's door). One possibility, the "out, out damn spot" line from Macbeth. Other possiblity: it might be a clue for Philo Vance's "The Kennel Club Murder Case," where locking a door without a key was a plot device. But if we start to think about films with significant moments involving keyholes we'll be at this until the 2015 New Years Day wacky drawing.
Maybe the placement is itself symbolic and not literally from a film, the phrase "in a corner" or "in a low place," "low spot," or even "low key" could be part of the clue. Come to that, what is the correct pronounciation for "locataire" anyway?
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:01 pm
by domino harvey
Isn't there an Illuminati website y'all should be posting on
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:29 pm
by Zot!
TMDaines wrote:criterion10 wrote:Anyone else disappointed that none of these films depicted in the New Year's Drawing are WB titles? Makes me wonder if Badlands really was a one-off deal...
Not at all. As much as the bigger labels have done some decent work with some titles from thr majors, the last thing we need is them releasing more of it and pushing leas well known stuff even further to the side.
From what has been guessed so far, I'm pretty disappointed in general with this tease. All the notable ones are either previously unofficialy confirmed (like Eraserhead), or already available on blu elsewhere, or upgrades of existing titles or Hulu titles. None of the rumored Wenders, or Von Trier, or Tati. Are there any major surprises?
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:37 pm
by matrixschmatrix
Well, Safety Last! was something that was speculated about, but I don't think there was any real confirmation before this- and surely that's a pretty huge deal, particularly since there's no reason to believe the rest of the Lloyd material wasn't part of the package.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:39 pm
by bringmesomechemicals
Eraserhead scaling the building could be Criterion's announcement that Godzilla will not be the only giant monster in the collection as they will add King Kong in 2013. Also, the person with folded arms on the third floor is behind a window with seven holes in it. The person also appears to be "brooding", so Cronenberg hinted twice?
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:41 pm
by Drucker
bringmesomechemicals wrote:Eraserhead scaling the building could be Criterion's announcement that Godzilla will not be the only giant monster in the collection as they will add King Kong in 2013. Also, the person with folded arms on the third floor is behind a window with seven holes in it. The person also appears to be "brooding", so Cronenberg hinted twice?
King Kong is available via blu-ray from Warner already. Not a chance.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:49 pm
by Zot!
domino harvey wrote:The Heartbreak Kid would be one of the most important Criterion releases ever
This seems awfully hyperbolic, I like Charles Grodin as much as the next guy, but would there be some particular significance to releasing this? I remember it as a lesser Albert Brooks movie.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:01 pm
by britcom68
Zot! wrote:domino harvey wrote:The Heartbreak Kid would be one of the most important Criterion releases ever
This seems awfully hyperbolic, I like Charles Grodin as much as the next guy, but would there be some particular significance to releasing this? I remember it as a lesser Albert Brooks movie.
The Heartbreak Kid had no Albert Brooks. Charles Brodin and Albert Brooks together in a film? "Real Life." The best way to appreciate that film would be releasing it paired with all of the actual Lourd family television episodes that directly inspired "Real Life." Could be a worthwhile release, not an important release, but an entertaining one.
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:17 pm
by Zot!
I was trying to say that it felt to me more like a lesser Albert Brooks (who I like) directed movie and not one of the most important releases Criterion could ever muster. I'm not criticizing the film on it's own terms, but questioning its epic significance.