Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:20 pm
I can't say I'm surprised, but this does irk me a bit: http://www.canoe.ca/LondonPDF/20060307.pdf
Nope. I saw 3 of the 5 nominees (including the winner) and none is close to being impressive in any sense. I guess that you can claim that "paradise now" is at least politically controversial and "Sophie Scholl" features a fantastic female lead performance.cdnchris wrote: I didn't see any of the Foreign Film nominees. Did anybody here? Did the right one win?
I agree, but if you think about it, Traffic really didn't say anything groundbreaking about the war on drugs either and it is still an excellent film. I think that Syriana, like Traffic, is a very well-made movie that isn't saying anything new but is keeping the focus on an issue that is so important. In this day and age where people's attention spans seem to be the size of fruit flies I think we need a film like Syriana to pop up occasionally as a reminder of how corrupt and complex the oil industry is.Andre Jurieu wrote:I didn't think Syriana was hard to follow either, but my main problem with the film is that it simply offered information that was already pretty obvious. Everyone associated to this film kept talking about how they were going to provide the awful truth about the Oil Industry, and all I got was the same stuff that has been known for the last 10-20 years. I also didn't enjoy the fact that it was essentially Gagan recycling Soderbergh's efforts in Traffic. It was decent, but not as daring as it seemed to think it was.
I assume that you don't care for The Godfather, Annie Hall, All About Eve, and Rebecca.In reality, I can barely name one film that has won Best Picture Oscar that I have seen more than once.
There have been plenty of great films that have won best picture over the years, although over the last 20-25 years lovable winners are more infrequent.Michael wrote:I assume that you don't care for The Godfather, Annie Hall, All About Eve, and Rebecca.In reality, I can barely name one film that has won Best Picture Oscar that I have seen more than once.
Oh hell yes. Crash is a non-stop laff riot. Gentlemen's Agreement just plain stinks.n. w. wrote:And I'd still take Crash over Gentlemens Agreement any day.
That's Kool & the Gang. Hey, everyone's allowed to complain about stuff that sticks in their craw, and it's not like I don't understand becoming frustrated over the results of the Oscars. I've been known to get temperamental whenever I've had to watch Scorsese's "Oh, it's so nice that guy won. I completely respect his work." face. I guess it's easier to take once one becomes indifferent to the outcome. It's fairly meaningless in the grand scheme of things, even if it means a lot to Hollywood and its on-lookers.kieslowski_67 wrote:Andre,
I should not have made those posts complaining about the Oscars. In hindsight, my wife and I should have listened to many of our friends, and some on the board that the Oscars is just a low brow award show and not something for cinephines. The AMPASS does it take it seriously and does not take films as kind of sacred art. I have been taking the damn show and AMPASS too seriously for way too long. My bad.
I completely agree that Syriana is a decent primer for people who are ignorant of the oil industry, especially since it delivers it's message in an somewhat entertaining manner (smuggle in the edumacation with the explosions, I guess).Fletch F. Fletch wrote:I agree, but if you think about it, Traffic really didn't say anything groundbreaking about the war on drugs either and it is still an excellent film. I think that Syriana, like Traffic, is a very well-made movie that isn't saying anything new but is keeping the focus on an issue that is so important. In this day and age where people's attention spans seem to be the size of fruit flies I think we need a film like Syriana to pop up occasionally as a reminder of how corrupt and complex the oil industry is.
Plus, I think the film is a decent primer for people who aren't aware of all of the complexities of the oil trade.
Huh, so Crash is shit? And the consensus on this board is that Crash sucks? Happy to be in the minority on this one. Perhaps it flaunted the racism-from-every-corner flag a little much but I thought it was nicely put together with some impressive performances. Let's get back to this in five years after some circumspection and perhaps a second viewing.marty wrote:The Oscars is my guilty pleasure of the year. I enjoy watching it and I even attend a live broadcast of it here in Australia. I never take it seriously but I had fun this year. When Crash was announced as Best Picture winner, I was in a theatre with about another 100 people and I yelled out "Its shit!". I enjoy bitching about the Oscars. You can't possible take it seriously. Look at some of the winners and you just cringe!
In reality, I can barely name one film that has won Best Picture Oscar that I have seen more than once.
If the Snakes on a Plane snakes don't get Best Supporting Actor, the aviation industry will have successfully implemented their anti-reptilian agenda.skuhn8 wrote:Bring out the next bandwagon, please.
Classic stuff!hearthesilence wrote:Here's the Colbert Report making the predictions using "Da Colbert Code":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIot4A2f ... 18%2B%2522
Here's the victory lap:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wFu%2012yOULA4