Page 6 of 23

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:42 am
by Jeff
Cinetwist wrote:his whole post history prior to this thread was a troll-like bating game towards MoC fans, whereby each time a new release was announced he'd whine and say that he was going to wait for the criterion because criterions have a "prestige" factor that MoC are incabable of replicating.
He's also the one that declared on multiple occasions that no good films ever came out of the 70s and that Robert Altman should be erased from the history of cinema. It's always seemed like he was just here to push peoples' buttons.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:51 am
by domino harvey
sounds like we need to bump this discovery up to five devils

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:31 am
by janet
domino harvey wrote:sounds like we need to bump this discovery up to five devils
That is one funny comment. Thank you Mr. Domino

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:57 am
by godardslave
janet wrote:
domino harvey wrote:sounds like we need to bump this discovery up to five devils
That is one funny comment. Thank you Mr. Domino
nows your chance! post that resume before the 15 minutes pass by... :shock:

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:17 am
by SheriffAmbrose
godardslave wrote:
janet wrote:
domino harvey wrote:sounds like we need to bump this discovery up to five devils
That is one funny comment. Thank you Mr. Domino
nows your chance! post that resume before the 15 minutes pass by... :shock:
Yeah Domino, You freaked it. Honest to God, I would include a screen cap of that on my resume.

Aside from that, is anyone else reminded of the closing scenes of Ace in the Hole? The circus is over.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:57 am
by Lemmy Caution
SheriffAmbrose wrote:Aside from that, is anyone else reminded of the closing scenes of Ace in the Hole? The circus is over.
Yeah. As this thing continues to snowball, and more people jump into the fray, I've started wondering where Kirk Douglass is.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:02 am
by exte
Thread finally locked?

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 am
by Tommaso
Wouldn't suggest this at the moment, as indeed there may be the chance to bring it to a definitive end. But probably the more important things have been said, and perhaps it may go to sleep for a while until something happens or we hear from Mr.Numbers.

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:41 pm
by lady wakasa
It might be a hoax... and it might be that he found a lawyer whose first advice was to stop posting information on a public bulletin board which has gotten press notice. (Changing his email implies getting inundated by private messages.)

It may be time to sit back and see whether anything happens in the next few months. If there is a film, word will come out at some point.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:33 am
by Rufus T. Firefly
According to thisFrench blog, an almost complete print of Bardelys the Magnificent has turned up. There is a very brief sequence of this previously lost film in Show People.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:31 pm
by Michael Kerpan
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:According to thisFrench blog, an almost complete print of Bardelys the Magnificent has turned up. There is a very brief sequence of this previously lost film in Show People.
Wow -- and it already has 36 rating votes on IMDB. ;~}

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:57 am
by Roger_Thornhill
I feel like I've been raped. :(

But this is one rape that's the victim's fault. Never trust messages boards.

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:53 am
by Rufus T. Firefly
Michael Kerpan wrote:
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:According to thisFrench blog, an almost complete print of Bardelys the Magnificent has turned up. There is a very brief sequence of this previously lost film in Show People.
Wow -- and it already has 36 rating votes on IMDB. ;~}
Show me a prominent lost film on IMDb that doesn't have rating votes.

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:40 pm
by Luke M
I've read through this whole thread. Very fascinating indeed. I don't think we should necessarily be declaring this as a hoax. I'm sure posting updates on a message board aren't in the best interest of the owner. I hope it turns out to be true but I'm quite sure we won't know for sure for a long time.

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:17 am
by Macintosh
Jeff wrote:
Cinetwist wrote:his whole post history prior to this thread was a troll-like bating game towards MoC fans, whereby each time a new release was announced he'd whine and say that he was going to wait for the criterion because criterions have a "prestige" factor that MoC are incabable of replicating.
He's also the one that declared on multiple occasions that no good films ever came out of the 70s and that Robert Altman should be erased from the history of cinema. It's always seemed like he was just here to push peoples' buttons.
Oh it's this guy? If i had known that to begin with, i'd never have believed this thing was true for one second. OK FELLAS, LOCK IT UP!

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:54 am
by Adam
This was pretty fun & interesting to read for the first time.

Whether or not this particular story is true, I have a few friends at the UCLA and Academy Film Archives, and the places that films have been found is quite remarkable. Many seem to be, as mentioned before, the last theatre on the shipping chain, and they never get returned. Some collection was buried in a swimming pool that had been filled in with dirt, in Canada or Alaska, or something like that. Heck, Filmforum screened something at the Nuart in LA in 1999 or so that never got returned. I know it was sitting at the Landmark Theatre offices for years, but I don't know hat's happened to it. It was a really good film too, dealing with the Russian Space Program. If anyone is here with Landmark, please let me know.

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:38 am
by Rufus T. Firefly
Regarding Bardelys the Magnificent, this news articlestates at the end that Serge Bromberg has found a copy of the film.

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:15 pm
by Kinsayder
How much of Sternberg's I, Claudius is known to exist? I ask because there was an old gent on London's LBC radio about a fortnight ago who said a friend of his who worked at Denham Film Studios had salvaged some old reels which contained about half an hour of the film.

I'm not sure how long ago this was, so it may be the same material that was used in the 1965 BBC documentary The Epic That Never Was (which I haven't seen).

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:26 pm
by Barmy
They should turn this thread into a movie.

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:42 pm
by Antoine Doinel
...and then lose it.

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:38 am
by Antares
Any truth to the rumor that 125100 is actually Stephen Glass? #-o

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:29 am
by Oedipax
I did a double take when I saw myself listed as the author of this one! Not my hoax, folks :o

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:54 pm
by shumpy
Following the 4 Devils debacle, I would never have believed this story about a supposed rediscovery of London After Midnight...but then, after the Metropolis find, I don't know what to believe anymore. I suppose it speaks to my skepticism that I'm posting in this particular thread, but anyway, decide for yourselves. (Apologies if this was previously posted somewhere else on the site.)

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:30 am
by Kinsayder
Well, the Metropolis news came from Helmut Possmann, director of the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau Foundation, and from Martin Koerber. This London After Midnight story is from, um, Sid Terror of TheHorrorDrunx.com.

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:43 am
by domino harvey
Of all the missing films, this is the "most sought after lost film in cinema history"? #-o