Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:50 pm
Why not? If Criterion can release the "Monsters and Madmen" box...a.khan wrote:Yes, I wish Child's Play makes it to Criterion at some point.
Why not? If Criterion can release the "Monsters and Madmen" box...a.khan wrote:Yes, I wish Child's Play makes it to Criterion at some point.
Well, that makes a lot more sense to me.Of course I am refering to Lumet's, Child's Play! My post was all about Lumet - and I even put the year of release (1972) in parentheses.
I second this. and... a new print of The Tenant is screening in NYC soon... I can only hope this means great things!Cinephrenic wrote:I'd like to see a Criterion Don't Look Now. Expecially with a Roeg/Sutherland commentary on the film.
GODDAMNIT!!! I just bought the vanilla edition for seven dollars...just like Polanski and Criterion to fuck with me again like this...I hope they end up in a Kafka-esque hell of their own creation trying to come up with any worthy special features for this. Oh wait... #-oCinephrenic wrote:I second this. and... a new print of The Tenant is screening in NYC soon... I can only hope this means great things!
Not sure what that means about Insignificance, though I guess the obvious choice would be that they're taking their time with those acquisitions.We here at Criterion love Nic Roeg. However while we do hope to get to more of his films eventually, to the best of my knowledge we don't have any plans at this time. I hope this helps, and thanks for your email!
They will be releasing one of his insignificant films at some point in the future.kaujot wrote:As far as Don't Look Now, according to an e-mail Tamara sent me, Criterion has no current plans for any more Nic Roeg.
hahahaha... so funny... nice play on wordsPerson wrote:They will be releasing one of his insignificant films at some point in the future.kaujot wrote:Criterion has no current plans for any more Nic Roeg.
I know, but Tamara didn't mention it at all, so I assume the release is a ways off.Person wrote:They will be releasing one of his insignificant films at some point in the future.kaujot wrote:As far as Don't Look Now, according to an e-mail Tamara sent me, Criterion has no current plans for any more Nic Roeg.
I would second Harold And Maude - with a commentary track by Wes Anderson and Bud Cort.RobertAltman wrote:Any chance we might get Harold and Maude from Criterion soon? Another Paramount title in desperate need of an SE, and Hal Ashby is a director who belongs in the collection.
Criterion seriously needs some Ruth Gordon. I would buy a disc of Harold and Maude from them in a heartbeat, especially if Bud Cort has anything to do with its production. Speaking of Ruth Gordon, how about Rosemary's Baby? So much dirt and gossip around its "making of", and yet all we get on the R1 is a pompous (does this go without saying?) Robert Evans interview and a standard transfer (which could most definitely look better in the right hands.) I've been trying to keep myself from worrying too much about the Paramount possibilities... oh well.Antoine Doinel wrote:I would second Harold And Maude - with a commentary track by Wes Anderson and Bud Cort.RobertAltman wrote:Any chance we might get Harold and Maude from Criterion soon? Another Paramount title in desperate need of an SE, and Hal Ashby is a director who belongs in the collection.
Seconded (pardon the pun). Paramount does very, very well with its Black and White catalogue.peerpee wrote:Seconds currently has a *gorgeous* transfer with director commentary.
Of the films of his that are available on DVD, yes that is true. But a few gems are missing:oldsheperd wrote:I believe almost all of Frankenheimer's films have commentaries on them.