Page 86 of 112
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:14 pm
by aox
swo17 wrote:It's a great film. I just would have expected Bicycle Thieves first.
Agreed. But this is welcome.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:16 pm
by swo17
I wonder how much to read into this :-"
Criterion wrote:We’ve always wanted to release a definitive edition of Abel Gance’s silent masterpiece Napoleon. And we hope to one day, but it’s a project of enormous complexity.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:28 pm
by captveg
Criterion wrote:We’ve always wanted to release a definitive edition of Abel Gance’s silent masterpiece Napoleon. And we hope to one day, but it’s a project of enormous complexity.
That would be amazing, because you know Criterion would take the time / effort to present all versions, multiple scores, etc. One can only pray this means they struck a deal to release it.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:32 pm
by movielocke
Damn. I was hoping it meant they got The Awful Truth from Paramount...
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:45 pm
by jwd5275
Criterion wrote:We’ve always wanted to release a definitive edition of Abel Gance’s silent masterpiece Napoleon. And we hope to one day, but it’s a project of enormous complexity.
I wonder if this means Peter Becker is going to be at the showing on the 24th? (I have a fantasy of cornering him and squeezing some info from him, using thumbscrews of course....)
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:56 pm
by aox
What is the average time between newsletter hint and 15th new release announcement?
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:27 pm
by swo17
I think it's usually around two months but can obviously take much longer (Cronos for example took nearly two years).
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:29 pm
by captveg
Lately it's been 3-4 months.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:06 pm
by arsonfilms
movielocke wrote:Damn. I was hoping it meant they got The Awful Truth from Paramount...
That was my first thought when I saw the image, as it exactly matches one of the movie's funniest scenes. I would not be surprised if that's what it really is.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:12 pm
by Aspect
It is Umberto D. There is no doubt.

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:23 pm
by aox
This could potentially be a August or September release. Very exciting.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:45 pm
by ellipsis7
swo17 wrote:TMDaines wrote:swo17 wrote:Umberto D.? Seems an odd choice.
Why an odd choice? The consensus would suggest it's one of the great films by one of the great directors.
It's a great film. I just would have expected
Bicycle Thieves first.
Remember UMBERTO D also made it first to DVD... Question is will they add any additional extras for BR?...
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:30 pm
by Cinephrenic
Maybe they do a Zavattini-De Sica set with Bicycle Thieves, Umberto D, Shoeshine, Miracle in Milan, The Children Are Watching Us, The Gold of Naples.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:35 pm
by domino harvey
Maybe they'll succumb to Jean Dujardin-mania and include Un homme et son chien!
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:42 pm
by ellipsis7
UGGIE/FLIC (enigmatically): Woof !?... It's a dog's life...
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:52 am
by duck duck
Isn't that the same as the original clue only with the hat turned blue?
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:05 am
by Minkin
duck duck wrote:Isn't that the same as the original clue only with the hat turned blue?
Similar:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:10 am
by domino harvey
Isn't that technically evidence of the fabled double (or quadruple) clue?

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:40 am
by bamwc2
domino harvey wrote:Isn't that technically evidence of the fabled double (or quadruple) clue?

No. Back in the early days of the newsletter clues, they always had animals that were already in the collection presenting them (including my favorite, the demon from
Equinox). They eventually discontinued this trend. Regardless,
Umberto D was out long before that clue.
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:07 am
by duck duck
I'm not sure but were there clues back then? I think they may have just had animals bringing us the forthcoming instead of having the inaccurate catalogs and that turned into animals being the clues?
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:32 pm
by bamwc2
Wacky rosemary, eh?
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:36 pm
by Fierias
Rosemary's Baby?
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:36 pm
by arsonfilms
bamwc2 wrote:
Wacky rosemary, eh?
Rosemary's Baby!
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:38 pm
by mfunk9786
YES!!
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:38 pm
by bamwc2
Fierias wrote:Rosemary's Baby?
Yep, and here I was trying to figure out which Rosemary Clooney film they might have.
