Page 2 of 18
Re: Star Wars
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 7:00 am
by captveg
I imagine one of the key storylines of TLJ will be what Luke tried to do post-ROTJ, including how he failed with Ben Solo.
Re: Star Wars
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 4:13 pm
by willoneill
New MST3K and now a new
Star Wars: The Last Jedi trailer ... this is a Good Friday
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:02 pm
by domino harvey
Um, underwhelming, right?
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:08 pm
by pzadvance
domino harvey wrote:Um, underwhelming, right?
Very.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:26 pm
by domino harvey
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 6:24 pm
by Brian C
That poster looks nice, though
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:35 pm
by carmilla mircalla
that trailer pretty much followed the structure/formula for the Force Awakens trailer. It doesn't work. Also whoever designed and then approved of that poster should face a firing squad.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:44 pm
by domino harvey
The poster's the only good thing here
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:56 pm
by John Shade
Seems slightly uneven, the poster. I'd prefer a more direct homage to Face/Off.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:42 pm
by movielocke
I really liked the teaser and I love that poster
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:25 pm
by captveg
It's a decent teaser and a good poster.
The most intriguing thing to me about The Last Jedi is the idea that Luke is wanting to end the smallness of the light/dark Jedi dynamic, perhaps even getting inspiration from some very ancient pre-Jedi history. I mean, the Force didn't awake to just return to the Jedi/Sith same old thing (I hope).
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:47 pm
by bearcuborg
Not as good as TFA trailer, but Luke's last line is quite intriguing. The red sand effect from the space ships flying across the desert was nice. I loved the first shot of the rock, before Rey's hand lands. At first it looked like space.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:52 am
by mfunk9786
You guys know it's just a teaser, right? Gorgeous images and hints at stunning drama are plenty for me. It looks great.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 6:09 am
by domino harvey
It's like mostly shots of Daisy Ridley, of course it's gorgeous-looking. But I didn't feel anything watching it-- I am so ready to love the followup to the Force Awakens (especially after R-oh-gue One), but the first taste wasn't promising
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 7:03 am
by The Narrator Returns
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-?)
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:01 am
by All the Best People
domino harvey wrote:It's like mostly shots of Daisy Ridley, of course it's gorgeous-looking. But I didn't feel anything watching it-- I am so ready to love the followup to the Force Awakens (especially after R-oh-gue One), but the first taste wasn't promising
I think it is very difficult for the trailers for this picture to match the excitement engendered by the
Force Awakens trailers, for the simple reason that, then, we didn't know who we were looking at, what they were doing, or why they were doing it, so anticipation was generated. Here, where we know who these people are and see what they're doing -- which is all stuff we would expect them to do (I'd bet that 95% or more of that footage comes from the first 35 minutes of the movie) -- we don't have that same feeling.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 9:25 pm
by bearcuborg
I'll say this, I hope that's all we see of Luke. TFA and this trailer teased it enough; the payoff should only come in the actual movie. Also, while this teaser may not be great - dramaticly, ALL of it looked promising.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:20 am
by MoonlitKnight
It's certainly the first SW teaser/trailer released under the Di$ney regime that didn't blatantly play on people's OT nostalgia or give off a 'fan film on a Hollywood budget' vibe. Hopefully they're past that phase now (at least for the 'core' saga) .
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:34 pm
by bearcuborg
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:28 pm
by domino harvey
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:29 am
by Clarence
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:33 am
by bunuelian
So glad they're staying true to the prequels by putting a bunch of animated, yelling Pokemon on the screen from time to time.
Maybe in the remake of RotJ they can have the giant Gollum sing some death metal tunes. That would be ok.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:55 pm
by Big Ben
In fairness Star Wars has always had weird shit screeching on screen. Some are even named. Like fan favorite Salacious D. Crumb.
Although in fairness to Disney I imagine toy sales are always a factor now too.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:24 pm
by cdnchris
It's aimed at kids obviously. But I had to laugh when both of mine said that they looked cuter in the trailer than the toy versions at Target, which they both agreed were ugly.
Re: Star Wars Franchise (1977-∞)
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:14 pm
by bunuelian
What amazes me is the amount of resources, both material and cultural, that are wasted on these intensely, almost deliberately mediocre films (speaking of the prequels and the films since). But I suppose the endless deluge of terrible comic book movies gives them a context where creating banal, feature-length commercials for toys is the height of creativity.
The little creatures in the originals were at least muppets, lending them artifice that lets the imagination do a little lifting and forcing the filmmakers to give them a degree of Bressonian restraint. Whereas CGI creatures can do anything, so (and here's the mediocrity) they do.
My bitterness toward these films is partly fed by the siege mentality that comes from raising small children in a world where their imaginations are driven into violent corporate cul de sacs by Disney and Marvel.