Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 3:37 pm
"It's alive and it's huge!"
So scaaarrrry...
So scaaarrrry...
I agree. That CGI was god awful. I hope it is just because they were in a rush to get the trailer together. I hope they go back and spruce the effects up better than that. But if that is the quality we can expect, I cringe at the thought of what the monster will look like. Maybe there is a reason it is getting a January release, after all...lord_clyde wrote:That cgi statue of liberty head looks like shit.
his bitching.The Invunche wrote:What exactly is it that you intend to give up ?
This is the kind of thing I'll talk about in reverence to my grandchildren.domino harvey wrote:Friday July 13, 2007
Shock waves rippled through the entertainment world today as message board poster rs98762001 "called out" a movie trailer.
Thank you. I know for a fact that JJ Abrams is quaking in his boots.flyonthewall2983 wrote:This is the kind of thing I'll talk about in reverence to my grandchildren.domino harvey wrote:Friday July 13, 2007
Shock waves rippled through the entertainment world today as message board poster rs98762001 "called out" a movie trailer.
I liked theMatt wrote:There are some very plausible rumors going around concerning what this movie is actually about. I won't post them here (they're easy to Google up on your own),Spoiler
search on Cloverfield, Monstrous, and Behemoth
but I will say that, if they are true, they make this movie sound a whole lot more interesting than any previous theories ("Lost" movie, new Godzilla movie) did.
I believe that line might be, "I saw it. It's alive. It's huge!" Although a movie about a giant lion could be lots of fun. "Aslan is back. And this time, he's pissed!"GoldenPilgrim wrote:"I saw it, it's a lion it's huge!"
Unless it is some sort of meta-statement in which a terrible CG artist recently fired from the lucrative job of creating special effects for a monster movie due to their poor quality sends his misshapen creations out to destroy the real world. Only a desperately poor comic book artist, barely earning enough from his work to keep up repayments on his meagre loft apartment each month, with only enough left over for just the one blow out party each week ("Sure man, it's your birthday again!"), is able to stop this maniac by sending out his own carefully crafted hand-drawn characters into battle against the spetacular and expensive, yet poorly conceived CG!GoldenPilgrim wrote:And I completely agree, seeing the monster would kill the image that everyone would create in their head. Seeing how the rest of the CGI looks, I don't have high hopes for the monster.
Man, now I know the movie will disappoint me. Hell, I'm disappointed in it already.colinr0380 wrote:Unless it is some sort of meta-statement in which a terrible CG artist recently fired from the lucrative job of creating special effects for a monster movie due to their poor quality sends his misshapen creations out to destroy the real world. Only a desperately poor comic book artist, barely earning enough from his work to keep up repayments on his meagre loft apartment each month, with only enough left over for just the one blow out party each week ("Sure man, it's your birthday again!"), is able to stop this maniac by sending out his own carefully crafted hand-drawn characters into battle against the spetacular and expensive, yet poorly conceived CG!GoldenPilgrim wrote:And I completely agree, seeing the monster would kill the image that everyone would create in their head. Seeing how the rest of the CGI looks, I don't have high hopes for the monster.
It could be the Cool World for the modern age, with the final confrontation as the two artists face off against each other in a Boschian nightmare of pixels and ink - the final battle for the future of art will be decided tonight!
Or it could be a giant monster movie.
God, I hope not.colinr0380 wrote: It could be the Cool World for the modern age...