criterionforum.org

ShellOilJunior wrote:So what's the deal with awesome Welles?

Is THE TRIAL likely for today?

The Trial is not on listed on the Criterion Cast tumblr and he posted the link on his personal twitter account, so I'm not expecting it but it would be a nice surprise. (We already have 5 new spines this month supposedly!) Criterion does need to rescue The Trial out of PD hell at some point though.

11 Godard and Weekend coming up.

Sigh, not one commentary on any of the new movies. I can't believe Three Outlaw Samurai, which is a $40 price point and totally barebones.

I bet that pricepoint is wrong. The DVD is listed for $20.

matrixschmatrix wrote:Sigh, not one commentary on any of the new movies. I can't believe Three Outlaw Samurai, which is a $40 price point and totally barebones.

The DVD is currently listed as 15.95 on the website (so 29.99 price point?) So maybe there's still more disc features to be announced? Or the price is a typo somewhere?

Gosha and Preminger yay!

The Preminger is definitely exciting, as is the Marker upgrade. I'll still probably buy the Gosha, but if it costs the same as a full featured disc it's really going to piss me off. I'm kind of upset even if it's a bargain, it's not a late-period curiosity from an otherwise established director or something the way Identification of a Woman and The Makioka Sisters are

They didn't put extras on the lone other Gosha film they've released so maybe they don't find him interesting which would sicken me, but of well. What sort of extras would be good for the film?

Three Outlaw is now listed as $23.96 on blu ray on Criterion's website. So I guess those extras ain't coming.

knives wrote:They didn't put extras on the lone other Gosha film they've released so maybe they don't find him interesting which would sicken me, but of well. What sort of extras would be good for the film?

Hell, I don't know, but Gosha seems like an obscure enough figure that you could fill at least a couple of decent size features just talking about who he was, how his career worked and so forth without being redundant. I suppose I can't complain too much, as it's essentially an Essential Art House release with an astonishingly nice cover at this point.

A nice slate of releases, with several I'll buy, but only two upgrades in 2012 so far is incredibly disappointing. I was hoping they'd continue their 2011 pace of about three a month.

Why the spine number for Anatomy of a murder is 600 and the # for Vanya (which comes out a week later) is 599?

movielocke wrote:A nice slate of releases, with several I'll buy, but only two upgrades in 2012 so far is incredibly disappointing. I was hoping they'd continue their 2011 pace of about three a month.

I wish there were more upgrades too.

felipe wrote:Why the spine number for Anatomy of a murder is 600 and the # for Vanya (which comes out a week later) is 599?

Perhaps they just felt that the first Preminger and first James Stewart film in the Collection needed to be commemorated with the round number!

(Actually I tell a lie about James Stewart, since there are those Vertigo clips in Sans Soleil, or at least in the extra features, which makes it a neat coincidence that they're both coming out in the same month!)

2012 is looking great so far - while I like the idea of the Blu upgrades I'm also happy that there is a move towards more totally new (at least to me!) releases, even if they might be bare bones like Three Outlaw Samurai.

Criterion has frequently released titles out of order spinewise. See here.

I could swear that someone at Criterion (Mulvaney?) once said that the spine numbers indicate the order in which the discs went into production, not necessarily the order they are released in.

I'm just wondering where Criterion's stash of Chaplin is hiding- they've put out People on Sunday, The Complete Jean Vigo, and The Phantom Carriage between now and when the last Chaplin came out, so it can't be that they're afraid to release anything silent (or semi-silent.)

Maybe they're shellshocked after the last two cover art reveals.

CSM126 wrote:I could swear that someone at Criterion (Mulvaney?) once said that the spine numbers indicate the order in which the discs went into production, not necessarily the order they are released in.

That sounds more like Masters of Cinema. Cronos and Stagecoach, for example, were announced more than a year after they were hinted in the newsletter. I seriously doubt that Summer Hours or some of those other IFC titles went into the production before Stagecoach or Cronos.

swo17 wrote:Criterion has frequently released titles out of order spinewise. See here.

Wow, that means spines # 4, 5 and 10 were released before spine #3?

matrixschmatrix wrote:I'm just wondering where Criterion's stash of Chaplin is hiding- they've put out People on Sunday, The Complete Jean Vigo, and The Phantom Carriage between now and when the last Chaplin came out, so it can't be that they're afraid to release anything silent (or semi-silent.)

It looks like they've given up on Y tu mama tambien too.

matrixschmatrix wrote:

knives wrote:They didn't put extras on the lone other Gosha film they've released so maybe they don't find him interesting which would sicken me, but of well. What sort of extras would be good for the film?

Hell, I don't know, but Gosha seems like an obscure enough figure that you could fill at least a couple of decent size features just talking about who he was, how his career worked and so forth without being redundant. I suppose I can't complain too much, as it's essentially an Essential Art House release with an astonishingly nice cover at this point.

An episode of the original TV show would have been fun, just to give us some context and all that.

I would love to see the whole series released by someone. My non-animated Japanese television knowledge is pitiful.

Is it a problem in terms of PQ that World on a Wire is 212 minutes on one BR disc? That's slightly longer than Seven Samurai, on which all of the extras are relegated to a second disc, and Seven Samurai, I'm guessing, is more forgiving of compression because it isn't in color.

Perhaps somebody who has watched the new Fanny and Alexander set can put my fears to rest?

I've been eagerly looking forward to WoaW since I watched it on Hulu a while back, and I kind of assumed all along that it would be a two disc thing along the lines of S.S. just because of its length. I'd be happier were there more extras in what was announced today, but I'll be happy enough if the picture looks fabulous.

I'm just wondering where Criterion's stash of Chaplin is hiding

Maybe we'll get a Chaplin twofer, like with Chabrol & Suzuki: The Gold Rush & City Lights have been having a lot of buzz, but I'd like to see The Kid earlier rather than later, but I'd also like to see the unedited original version of the movie.

felipe wrote:

swo17 wrote:Criterion has frequently released titles out of order spinewise. See here.

Wow, that means spines # 4, 5 and 10 were released before spine #3?

I seem to remember The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou getting the 300 spine number when the rest of the Collection was still around the 270 mark, though I cannot recall too many other big jumps forward in number like that.

The big example of a gap being left and then filled is of course spine #1, where they had pencilled in Grand Illusion as being the primary release for a long time but eventually were waiting for better elements (I think) for so long that it ended up being released after the first fifty spine numbers, at around the time Criterion were changing their logo into the line one (which is why Grand Illusion never had one of the oldest looking "The Criterion Collection" logos).