Page 13 of 67

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:14 pm
by The Digital McGuffin
The typo on the Samurai Rebellion cover has been corrected.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:20 pm
by AZAI
All the coverart for the october releases is already is already online! looks awfully tastefull!

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:36 pm
by rwaits
Uhh.....yeah.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:38 pm
by jcelwin
While the samurai covers are not 'bad', I hate that the covers are all 'linked' though, since they really don't have a reason to be. They may have similar themes, and made around the same time, but they are not made to be a collection, nor are they directed by the same director.

I'm also beginning to think that maybe Criterion are letting the interns do the cover art. They seem to just watch the movie and pick out a nice screen-shot. The covers for 'The Wages of Fear' just looks boring, as does 'The Man Who Fell to Earth'. And, 'Naked' looks like it took 2 minutes to cut-paste-text; it seems people are just appreciating it because it is a little less slack then the mock one they did.

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 7:33 pm
by peerpee
jcelwin wrote:While the samurai covers are not 'bad', I hate that the covers are all 'linked' though, since they really don't have a reason to be. They may have similar themes, and made around the same time, but they are not made to be a collection, nor are they directed by the same director.
Excellent logic. I agree. The box set cover is okay, but there's no reason why each film couldn't have it's own (preferably original poster art style) cover. They'd be more historically faithful instead of all looking vaguely "1990s".

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:18 am
by criterionsnob
There's been a change to the Masculin Feminin cover:

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 5:51 am
by godardslave
ah, much nicer. she looks much happier now.

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 10:39 am
by jorencain
Ahhh, so much better. It looked way too cluttered at the top, across her head before.

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:30 pm
by Lemdog
Thank God!

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:50 pm
by yumitree
yeah, i think the new version just looks kind of plain.

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:16 pm
by analoguezombie
jcelwin wrote:I'm also beginning to think that maybe Criterion are letting the interns do the cover art. They seem to just watch the movie and pick out a nice screen-shot. The covers for 'The Wages of Fear' just looks boring, as does 'The Man Who Fell to Earth'. And, 'Naked' looks like it took 2 minutes to cut-paste-text; it seems people are just appreciating it because it is a little less slack then the mock one they did.
I agree. I think it's symptomatic of the new trend in graphic design, i.e. simple, uncluttered. I'm not entirely opposed to it, especially since most dvd covers cram so much junk on them it's difficult to even tell what is going on. The single, iconic image is a good use of the size of the dvd box though. And their style is quite refreshing from what else is being done, which is why it's probably so appealing initially. I love the new covers, but mainly due to these factors. Man, I want to work for Criterion though. I mean, I have photoshop too. Can I get a couple thousand bucks for a screen cap overlaid with bold text?

The covers for A Woman is A Woman, Throne of Blood, and the Antoine Doniel Series and far superior IMO to the screen cap style of Masculin/Feminin, Ikiru, and the Cassavetes Collection, if only b/c they display an artist's interpretation of the overall feeling the film is in imbued with. They are much more creative and will stand the test of time a lot better than this new style. Still the simplistic nature of the Rebel Samurai set is quite appealing.

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:50 pm
by Hrossa
Wow, Novemberr must be Technicolor cover month.

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:28 pm
by Cinephrenic
Probably Pickpocket.

I guess Pollack did Ran's cover art. The cover for Tales of Hoffmann looks like Disney's Fantasia. I love them all.

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:46 pm
by Alonzo the Armless
I love those 3 covers! Each approach is very appropriate and imaginative. Nice use of type too.

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:47 pm
by What A Disgrace
I'm not sure whether or not the Ugetsu or Tales of Hoffman covers are good, but seeing them makes me very happy.

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:29 pm
by peerpee
We have another typo! --- KENZI MIZOGUCHI!

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:55 pm
by godardslave
ugetsu is beautiful.

RAN is very bold and stylish.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 am
by Cinesimilitude
RAN = Mine. Im more stoked that theres a string of 7 movies I'm not really interested in. Ive got man who fell, bad timing, masculin feminin, and le samourai all on order. now i can take a break and just wait for RAN.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:10 am
by ben d banana
godardslave wrote:RAN is very bold and stylish.
Or Costello-esque.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:10 am
by daniel p
If Kill is 313, Ran is 316 and Hoffman 317, then that means both 314 and 315 are blank... I guess Pickpocket will be one of them, what could the other be?

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:15 am
by Alonzo the Armless
RAN's cover is so perfect with the use of primary colors on pure white echoing the 3 armies of the suns who clash, destroying the peacetime.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:37 am
by Cinesimilitude
Au Revoir Les Enfants continues to be listed in the little dvd pamphlets and then get removed, it could be the one to go beside pickpocket.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:26 am
by Cinephrenic
It could be Jour de Fete or Milky Way. Pierrot le Fou, although it would be #309, or Elevator to the Gallows. Wasn't it getting a limited release.

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:10 am
by Lino
Nice to see some cover art consistency on these two later works by Kurosawa:

Image Image

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:20 pm
by Anonymous
I'm not sure about the Ugetsu cover (I like it, but there's something funny about it ...), but I love the other two. Ran is a bit wider than the others ... Is a digi-pak on the way?