Page 15 of 112
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:31 am
by Svevan
Cinephrenic wrote:December is usually a boxset or re-release month. Usually two titles. So maybe the Fullers or The Human Condition set.... or nothing.
Or fucking Andrei Rublev. I'll buy one for everyone on the forum if that happens.
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:05 pm
by mfunk9786
Svevan wrote:Cinephrenic wrote:December is usually a boxset or re-release month. Usually two titles. So maybe the Fullers or The Human Condition set.... or nothing.
Or fucking Andrei Rublev. I'll buy one for everyone on the forum if that happens.
Holding you to that.
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:25 pm
by What A Disgrace
mfunk9786 wrote:Svevan wrote:Cinephrenic wrote:December is usually a boxset or re-release month. Usually two titles. So maybe the Fullers or The Human Condition set.... or nothing.
Or fucking Andrei Rublev. I'll buy one for everyone on the forum if that happens.
Holding you to that.
Seconded.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:22 pm
by nosy lena
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:24 pm
by Matt
Magnificent Obsession. Thank goodness; nothing gets this board going more than an ol' fashioned
OAR argument.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:32 pm
by Jeff
Matt wrote:Magnificent Obsession. Thank goodness; nothing gets this board going more than an ol' fashioned
OAR argument.
I'm betting that Criterion includes both the Academy and SuperScope versions, leaving the cover art as the only thing to complain about.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:40 pm
by kaujot
I really should get around to seeing any of Sirk's work.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:47 pm
by GringoTex
Wall*E!
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:11 pm
by mfunk9786
GringoTex wrote:Wall*E!
=D> If only.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:27 pm
by domino harvey
Jeff wrote:Matt wrote:Magnificent Obsession. Thank goodness; nothing gets this board going more than an ol' fashioned
OAR argument.
I'm betting that Criterion includes both the Academy and SuperScope versions, leaving the cover art as
the only thing to complain about.
Well, we'll see. I do like a challenge
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:02 pm
by a.khan
Criterion shareholders must be extremely pleased with 2008. Can't say the same for me; but who the fuck am I, anyways. Continue.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:06 pm
by Tom Hagen
There are no shareholders; Criterion is a privately-owned company.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:10 pm
by domino harvey
Wait then what did I just buy thirty shares of? This is the last time I use a broker who advertises on Craigslist
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:27 pm
by Morbii
Tom Hagen wrote:There are no shareholders; Criterion is a privately-owned company.
Except that didn't Image buy them?
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:36 pm
by Tom Hagen
Image has a
distribution agreement with Criterion, but it does not own Criterion.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:44 pm
by What A Disgrace
I hope the Stahl version of the film is included.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:47 pm
by domino harvey
I hope the only extra is a photo gallery and they charge upper-tier price
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:01 pm
by Cinephrenic
Criterion is not a huge force in the market to go public.
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:02 am
by AfterTheRain
What A Disgrace wrote:I hope the Stahl version of the film is included.
I hope so too. CC could also throw in the novel to tie in with the release.
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:45 am
by kaujot
AfterTheRain wrote:I hope so too. CC could also throw in the novel to tie in with the release.
OH MY GOD NOT ANOTHER DIGIPACK
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:35 pm
by mfunk9786
kaujot wrote:OH MY GOD NOT ANOTHER DIGIPACK
#-o
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:04 pm
by Matt
Sir, I'm going to have to ask you to stop it with the
emoticon only posts.
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:21 pm
by mfunk9786
...okay.
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 3:42 pm
by Des Esseintes
Not to be a curmudgeon, but am I the only one who misses the newsletters from a few months ago--the ones that provided a bit of interesting trivia about each film, rather than just a blurb?
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 4:31 pm
by colinr0380
Des Esseintes wrote:Not to be a curmudgeon, but am I the only one who misses the newsletters from a few months ago--the ones that provided a bit of interesting trivia about each film, rather than just a blurb?
I'm with you there. It gave a good taster of some of the anecdotes to be found in the extra features!