Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:18 am
Are you trying to insinuate something about Robocop?
Page 18 of 47
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 10:05 am
That Nick Cage has got some balls.
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:06 pm
That blue color is gorgeous, those look great. They even make Chasing Amy look like it has iconic cinematography.
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:44 pm
If that film is EVER released on Criterion, I shall be forced to find those responsible and tear their &*%^$!@ nuts to oblivion.Badering wrote:Criterion should really release this film. Fucking masterpiece.
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:52 am
Reverend Jackson? Is that you?AfterTheRain wrote:If that film is EVER released on Criterion, I shall be forced to find those responsible and tear their &*%^$!@ nuts to oblivion.
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:37 am
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:00 am
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:10 am
If you ask me, you can't improve on the artwork Criterion did for Night and the City.
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:40 pm
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:43 pm
I don't know, Klaylock's comes pretty close. Why hasn't Criterion hired him/her yet?kaujot wrote:If you ask me, you can't improve on the artwork Criterion did for Night and the City.
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:49 am
More of just playing around in Photoshop, but this is probably my "dream" Criterion release...
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:50 am
I like your fantasy extras - now that's dedication!
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:29 am
I like how the 4K restoration is planned for 2008, and the Criterion release for 2009, so they will presumably have enough time to gather all of your proposed extras--at least you are being realistic!
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
I've been meaning to post these for a while.
These aren't fake Criterion titles, but I think they are worth a look:
Finally, an affectionate look at my personal hero.
These aren't fake Criterion titles, but I think they are worth a look:
Finally, an affectionate look at my personal hero.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:35 pm
Weak.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:38 pm
I enjoyed this subforum when it was an individual's honest attempt to artistically capture the essence of a film, boiled down to a cover. Now... bleh.
edit: obviously there are still some people making excellent covers on here, but filtering out all of the "jokes" is getting to be more and more tedius.
edit: obviously there are still some people making excellent covers on here, but filtering out all of the "jokes" is getting to be more and more tedius.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:52 pm
Maybe we should have a "serious" fake cover subforum and a "joke" fake cover subforum, and then maybe have each subforum further divided up by the decade of the film the cover was made for.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:53 pm
I know that Ambersons cover is supposed to be a joke, but someone should still be shot for having made it.
EDIT: I see Matt beat me to the punch, though I think he's being facetious.
Perhaps there should be separate subforums for "honest attempts at cover art" vs. "cover art that Criterion would never, ever put out, get it, wink wink"?cgray wrote:I enjoyed this subforum when it was an individual's honest attempt to artistically capture the essence of a film, boiled down to a cover. Now... bleh.
EDIT: I see Matt beat me to the punch, though I think he's being facetious.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:01 pm
Yes. There is some beautiful artwork in this thread, and I get very excited when I see it bumped. The jokes are fine, but they should have their own thread.cgray wrote:I enjoyed this subforum when it was an individual's honest attempt to artistically capture the essence of a film, boiled down to a cover. Now... bleh.
I just don't know where something like "The Hottie and the Nottie" would go. It looks great and real which IMO makes it belong in the serious thread, but obviously it is a joke. Quite the dilemma.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:04 pm
A suggestion for new thread titles:
So, You Want to Be Hired as a Criterion Cover Artist?
vs.
Megan Fox's Midriff and Other Delights
So, You Want to Be Hired as a Criterion Cover Artist?
vs.
Megan Fox's Midriff and Other Delights
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:04 pm
I am at a loss that Michael Savage was somehow omitted from the proceedings.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:38 pm
the bad 'joke' covers are the only reason I come to this particular thread... without them this would be boring and embarrassing.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:46 pm
aox wrote:I just don't know where something like "The Hottie and the Nottie" would go. It looks great and real
That looks great and real?
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:55 pm
compared to this:mfunk9786 wrote:aox wrote:I just don't know where something like "The Hottie and the Nottie" would go. It looks great and real
That looks great and real?
absolutely.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:03 pm
domino harvey wrote:No offense to those of you who I am sure are nice people, but there has never been a good fantasy Criterion cover posted on this board.