Page 187 of 188
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2025 6:24 am
by The Curious Sofa
Lowry_Sam wrote: Sat Aug 16, 2025 3:45 am
The Curious Sofa wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 8:13 am
Tracy and Hepburn never married; Tracy remained married to his first wife his entire life.
Well if the rumors are true, what Hepburn & Tracy shared was that both were not predominantly interested in the opposite sex and that their very public affair was an affair for show publicized by the studios to cover their real affairs (with members of the same sex).
These rumours are well known, but there has never been any proof. While I understand the importance of documenting LGBTQ+ history, I take these claims with a pinch of salt. Eventually, a biography always emerges that finds a 'new angle' and gets attention by claiming that some Hollywood legend was gay or bisexual. Considering how Ingrid Bergman became persona non grata because of her extramarital affair, it never made much sense to me to cover up homosexuality with an illicit relationship.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2025 8:46 am
by Orlac
Randall Maysin Again wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 9:00 pm
Here is a line from Gary Tooze's new review of
Shoeshine, that indicates that, not only is he a terrible writer, but that he's actually AI:
Additionally, the release boasts a new cover by F. Ron Miller, providing contextual depth and historical insights that enrich appreciation of this neorealist classic.
AI would explain the constant screenshots of kids in the bath in his desire to include nude photos.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 1:51 am
by Beloved Aunt
Here is a line from a review of
The Old Dark House on dvdcompare:
Originally created for the Eureka Blu-ray is "Meet the Femms" (37:58), a brand new video essay
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2025 2:33 pm
by Maladroit Aggregator
Lindo, as usual, makes an effort.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2025 2:52 pm
by Never Cursed
Ohhhhh, you're a Trotskyist! Your whole deal makes a lot more sense now.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2025 3:28 pm
by domino harvey
One of the most depressing, upsetting films I've ever seen. It has many good reviews though (that I've seen in other locations). Mystified. I guess it must be brilliantly made, or something.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2025 9:41 pm
by domino harvey
A man is so horny for Ginger from gilligans island's Grade-A bazongas that he rejects mccarthyism in favor of the immortal science of marxism-leninism.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2025 12:19 am
by Mr Sausage
What movie? Googling the review only brings up this thread.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2025 12:24 am
by domino harvey
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2025 4:54 pm
by Swift
Not a review but a plot summary on bluray.com -
A drama that follows the travails of the Pineda family in the Filipino city of Angeles. Bigamy, unwanted pregnancy, possible incest and bothersome skin irritations are all part of their daily challenges, but the real "star" of the show is an enormous, dilapidated movie theater that doubles as family business and living space. At one time a prestige establishment, the theater now runs porn double bills and serves as a meeting ground for hustlers of every conceivable persuasion. The film captures the sordid, fetid atmosphere, interweaving various family subplots with the comings and goings of customers, thieves and even a runaway goat while enveloping the viewer in a maelstrom of sound, noise and continuous motion.
Postman Pat and his environment sounds far darker than I remember it being.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 6:37 pm
by domino harvey
y'know, i'm disappointed. why couldn't they make this movie sadder??? like, why'd the dog have to live??? we should've gotten a scene where he gets hit by a fucking truck and then the old guy cries about it for minutes on end. hell, the old man should've gotten hit by a truck too! actually no, how about the maid gives birth to her baby and then they BOTH get hit by a truck and die painfully! that would be sad, just like real life! couldn't we get a scene where the old man gets beat up within an inch of his life and has all his money stolen, and then needs to pay a really expensive hospital bill? how about a scene where he gets diagnosed with cancer, malaria and the bubonic plague all at the same time? how about a scene where he gets struck by lightning? or, better yet, just start 'em off dead and hold the camera on his corpse for 90 minutes! now THAT's objective realism, baby! TRUE artistic mastery!!! this man's life is shit, just like yours, viewer! the real world sucks, and i relate to that!!!
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:03 pm
by Mr Sausage
Umberto D.?
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:35 pm
by aox
domino harvey wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 6:37 pm
y'know, i'm disappointed. why couldn't they make this movie sadder??? like, why'd the dog have to live??? we should've gotten a scene where he gets hit by a fucking truck and then the old guy cries about it for minutes on end. hell, the old man should've gotten hit by a truck too! actually no, how about the maid gives birth to her baby and then they BOTH get hit by a truck and die painfully! that would be sad, just like real life! couldn't we get a scene where the old man gets beat up within an inch of his life and has all his money stolen, and then needs to pay a really expensive hospital bill? how about a scene where he gets diagnosed with cancer, malaria and the bubonic plague all at the same time? how about a scene where he gets struck by lightning? or, better yet, just start 'em off dead and hold the camera on his corpse for 90 minutes! now THAT's objective realism, baby! TRUE artistic mastery!!! this man's life is shit, just like yours, viewer! the real world sucks, and i relate to that!!!
Instead of complaining about
Umberto D, this reviewer should make their own movie!
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:54 pm
by domino harvey
Mr Sausage wrote: Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:03 pm
Umberto D.?
Indeed
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:14 pm
by knives
The highest ranked English one on Letterboxd for Bellocchio’s heartbreaking
Kidnapped half makes me want to quit the Internet.
thats one way to get rid of my annoying son i havent tried
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 10:41 am
by MichaelB
Who on God's green earth thought it was a good idea to assign Blu-ray.com's Deaf Crocodile beat to Neil Lumbard?
The frustrating thing is that he clearly genuinely enjoyed
The Devil's Bride, but he simply doesn't have the writing chops to do it anywhere even vaguely close to justice. So instead we end up with bland drivel like this:
The Devil's Bride is an enchanting romantic musical. The story is adapted from the novel "Baltaragio malûnas" by Kazys Boruta. A musical about love conquering all. Starring Gediminas Girdvainis, Vasyl Symchych, Vaiva Mainelyte, and Regimantas Adomaitis.
I mean, it's definitely a musical—I can't take that away from him—but otherwise you get no sense whatever of what the film's like. Compare and contrast with Nathaniel Thompson at
Mondo Digital:
Who's up for a Lithuanian supernatural folk-rock musical? Continuing their track record of blowing viewers' minds with titles completely neglected in the U.S., Deaf Crocodile strikes again with The Devil's Bride (Velnio nuotaka), a completely sung feast for the senses clearly inspired by funked-up stage hit stampeding through Europe like Jesus Christ Superstar, Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, and La Révolution Française. Shot in scope and ultra-saturated color, it was a local hit and became something of a cult favorite among Soviet bloc audiences but has stayed under the radar pretty much everywhere else.
As for describing the central narrative, here's Lumbard:
Pinchiukas (Gediminas Girdvainis) is a devil who finds himself kicked out of Heaven and ends up at a frog pond owned by the simple farmer Baltaragis (Vasyl Symchych). Pinchiukas promises the farmer the hand of blonde love Marcelé (Vaiva Mainelyte) as long as it is in exchange for the as of yet unborn daughter, Jurga (also played by an adult Vaiva Mainelyte).
...and here's Thompson:
In the mountains of heaven, God and a lot of angels are having a banquet that soon turns raucous when they shake off their white robes and start to party. Faster than you can say "Lucifer," one of the instigators, top hat-wearing Pinčiukas (Girdvainis), is among those banished to Earth. He ends up in a lake on the property of Baltaragis (Simčičius), a lowly farmer, and their years-long relationship involves a bargain with the lives and souls of beautiful Marcelė and the daughter she has with Baltaragis, Jurga (both played by Vaiva Mainelytė). The latter is promised to the conniving imp when she comes of age, but of course things get complicated when she ends up falling in love with bearded man of the land Girdvainis (Adomaitis) -- all belted out in song.
Lumbard then does his usual meaninglessly gushing box-ticking—"The cinematography by Algimantas Mockus (Gyvieji didvyria, Riesutu duona) is lush and beautiful. The evocative cinematography adds so much wonder and charm to the filmmaking. The visuals are superb. There is a sense of majesty and wonder to the visuals and the manner in which the cinematography aids the storytelling."—before concluding with:
Directed by Arunas Zebriunas (The Girl and the Echo, The Beauty), The Devil's Bride is a must-see musical and one quite unlike anything else out there. The musical is creatively independent and manages to evoke a simultaneously dark and light aesthetic that is distinctly its own style. A masterful production and a must-see gem of Lithuanian filmmaking.
By contrast, here's Thompson:
That synopsis is a lot more linear than the experience of actually watching this film, which leaps through time periods and doesn't waste its time with old-fashioned concepts like character development. Instead you can just focus on the great, catchy music and psychedelic color palette, while the basic themes of temptation and true love come through clearly enough thanks to the source material, Larzys Bortua's 1945 novel Whitehorn's Windmill. A veteran of locally successful fable-style films geared towards children, director Arūnas Žebriūnas was a logical choice here with something a bit more adult in nature (mainly a tiny bit of nudity and strongly implied sexual longing). At a brisk 76 minutes, the film tears through its songs and characters without wasting any time and also manages to work in some raucous comic relief at regular intervals.
...and then Thompson goes on to review the disc and extras properly.
I know this is shooting fish in a barrel, but some writers are so bad as to be genuine Dunning-Kruger cases, in that they presumably have absolutely no idea just
how bad they are. I assume he wasn't paid (I hope he wasn't!), but then again I'm pretty certain that Thompson wasn't either.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 11:49 am
by Mr Sausage
I love how Lumbard's aversion to pronouns makes his sentences sound like self-contained units unrelated to whatever he wrote before. His paragraphs don't develop, they accrete.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 3:40 pm
by tenia
I'm still fairly certain it's a hole-filled template that he simply fills out depending on the movie. It's paint-by-numbers review pushed to its extreme, so much that it offers 0 insight to either the movie or the release. I could write those without having seen any of them. It's pointless, and if it wasn't for the visibility I guess it provides, I'd suggest anyone assignedto Lumbard to stop sending test material until they're assigned to someone whose reviews prove at a bare minimum that they've spent some time in from of it.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 2:01 am
by Red Screamer
This grammatical gaffe in
the NYT top 10s gave me a chuckle:
Alissa Wilkinson wrote:5. The Testament of Ann Lee (Mona Fastvold)
I've never seen a movie like this one, and can't imagine I ever will.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 7:42 am
by MichaelB
A real jaw-dropper of a one-star review on Amazon, reviewing
The Journals of Sylvia Plath.
Walker Storz wrote:Very depressing—Ms. Plath seems to have a very bleak outlook on life. In my opinion she overthinks things too much. If she is still out there, I hope you read this, Sylvia! Cheer up!
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:41 pm
by colinr0380
EDITOR'S NOTE: Sadly, Ms Sylvia Plath did not, in fact, cheer up.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:45 pm
by Zot!
colinr0380 wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:41 pm
EDITOR'S NOTE: Sadly, Ms Sylvia Plath did not, in fact, cheer up.
My daughter's English teacher, in what she meant as effusive praise of one of her essay assignments, referred to her as a "modern day Sylvia Plath". Uh, thanks, I guess...should I be worried?
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:51 pm
by MichaelB
colinr0380 wrote:EDITOR'S NOTE: Sadly, Ms Sylvia Plath did not, in fact, cheer up.
As alluded to no fewer than four times in the book’s introduction.
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 6:11 pm
by Feego
This reminds me of a day in my high school freshman English class when we were reading Edgar Allan Poe. A very perky girl (a cheerleader) helpfully observed, “He’s too depressed, he needs to have a bright, sunny day!”
Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2026 6:47 pm
by GaryC
I'm not going to say what one student while I was doing my English degree suggested Jane Austen needed, but it began "a good..."