Re: Awards Season 2018
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:51 pm
The way the Oscar nominations work is that the voters in each category fill out their ballots listing their choices ranked from 1 - 5. In the first round only the number one choices are counted, anything that didn't get a number one vote is eliminated. They have a magic number for a nomination, any films with that number of first choice placings gets automatically nominated. The film with the lowest total number one choices is eliminated and those ballots redistributed based on the number 2 ranking. It carries on like this until there are 5 nominees. So Cold War had to have a certain amount of number one votes to make it to the final five.felipe wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:01 pm How was Cold War even nominated for Best Director? I didn't think it had such a strong campaign. Does it mean that most people voted for it or can it be that just a few people voted for it but placed it high on their lists?
Also take into consideration that it’s not the entire category choosing the nominees, but it’s the specific branches. So the directors are voting for the Directing nominees, actors vote for acting nominees, costume designers vote for costumes, etc (except for Foreign Language and Documentary, which are voted through committees).rawlinson wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:55 pmThe way the Oscar nominations work is that the voters in each category fill out their ballots listing their choices ranked from 1 - 5. In the first round only the number one choices are counted, anything that didn't get a number one vote is eliminated. They have a magic number for a nomination, any films with that number of first choice placings gets automatically nominated. The film with the lowest total number one choices is eliminated and those ballots redistributed based on the number 2 ranking. It carries on like this until there are 5 nominees. So Cold War had to have a certain amount of number one votes to make it to the final five.felipe wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:01 pm How was Cold War even nominated for Best Director? I didn't think it had such a strong campaign. Does it mean that most people voted for it or can it be that just a few people voted for it but placed it high on their lists?
Another simple work-around is after the paywall loads just save the page to your computer and you get the article in full sans paywall overlay.Brian C wrote: Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:10 pm Just try turning on private browsing or a different browser or device and see if that works. The NYT only allows 5 free articles per month, but that’s easily worked around by trying any of the above.
Another simple work-around is after the paywall loads just save the page to your computer and you get the NYT article in full sans paywall overlay.Brian C wrote: Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:10 pm Just try turning on private browsing or a different browser or device and see if that works. The NYT only allows 5 free articles per month, but that’s easily worked around by trying any of the above.
Hard agree. I liked A Star Is Born and Cold War and have more affection than admiration for the spirit of Roma, but to me BlacKkKlansman should run away with Best Picture and Best Director and the fact that it's such a longshot for that to happen is a shame. It's not only the perfect film for this era, but it's probably (I haven't seen them all yet) the best one nominated in those categories.swo17 wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:40 am The more I think about it, the more I like BlacKkKlansman and...none of these other films
Hard disagree with both of you! I like BlacKkKlansman a lot (on my list it’s in a cluster of very good films in the #8-15 range for the year), but this is one of the rare years where the two best films (Roma and The Favourite) are also nominated for Best Picture. I wouldn’t be upset if Lee’s film won, but it’s one of three worthy candidates*.mfunk9786 wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:33 pmHard agree. I liked A Star Is Born and Cold War and have more affection than admiration for the spirit of Roma, but to me BlacKkKlansman should run away with Best Picture and Best Director and the fact that it's such a longshot for that to happen is a shame. It's not only the perfect film for this era, but it's probably (I haven't seen them all yet) the best one nominated in those categories.swo17 wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:40 am The more I think about it, the more I like BlacKkKlansman and...none of these other films
Also Amazon has been pushing it like a madman.Ribs wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:06 pm As a thread in the lists project subforum can attest, the Directors branch has a long and storied history of getting one random cool pick that doesn’t get into other major categories, like Lynch for Mulholland Drive and Almodovar for Talk to Her
Sums up how I also feel about Lee's film (haven't seen Lanthimos yet)swo17 wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 5:16 pm Roma and The Favourite are fine but I have a hard time getting too worked up about them (and I really like both directors)
"Who?" - the people buying the advertisers' chips and soda
I mean, I got to say, this was a fantastic year for me. I currently have 3 films from this year in my Top 100 of all time, which is just kind of obscene: Burning, The Other Side of the Wind, and First Reformed.dda1996a wrote: Thu Jan 24, 2019 8:54 pm I'm rather surprised at the many people who named 2018 a great year for cinema, as this is the year where most films I merely "liked", with only Burning and Cold War at the moment being great films for me (and am guessing Beale would join).
Especially compared to last year's crazy amount of terrific films. First time in a while that I don't love any BP nominee (I usually get a spectrum of Love > Hate on these BP nominees)
Well duh, but the song does have a lot of fun stage potential and bluesgrass seems like a way to get new people to watch.