criterionforum.org

Thanks, RedChannels.

captveg wrote:One just hopes that they only delay it rather then cancel it. See: Tom & Jerry Golden Collection Vol. 2

Barring the ideal situation of a redo of the reconstruction in HD, I wouldn't be too disappointed if this release got cancelled. Not much point in a blu release of the studio-butchered version of a film presented as if that's the main version to watch, just because they didn't look ahead to HD when doing the reconstruction.

Gregory wrote:Thanks, RedChannels.

captveg wrote:One just hopes that they only delay it rather then cancel it. See: Tom & Jerry Golden Collection Vol. 2

Barring the ideal situation of a redo of the reconstruction in HD, I wouldn't be too disappointed if this release got cancelled. Not much point in a blu release of the studio-butchered version of a film presented as if that's the main version to watch, just because they didn't look ahead to HD when doing the reconstruction.

Absolutely! The fairly deluxe DVD release of the Reconstruction is fine, because... compression issues aside, it's virtually the same resolution as the DigiBeta master which made it. Whereas having that added to a Blu-Ray would just be an insult to buyers, and to Sam's memory. Christa pointed out the it's 70th anniversary of D-Day, too.

I've got a few irons in the fire, still. I hope. I still have this funny feeling that a new scan of the 35mm printing negative (i.e. the film-out of the DigiBeta) might at _least_ yield a result which looks more mushed together, more analog, than a mere port from the DigiBeta. I realize it's a fairly preposterous premise, but... imagine how much cheaper that would be to master than actually re-constructing the reconstruction. I'd love to see some tests done.

Last Fall, I re-watched Fuller's The Big Red One: The Reconstruction on DVD. This is definitely one of the all-time favorite war films, and IMHO is quite underrated these days. The battle scenes, story, and cinematography are all top-notch.

I remember seeing this film on network TV many, many years ago & being underwhelmed. IMHO the Reconstruction transformed an average film to a truly great film - the additional footage/editing was extremely well-thought out & definitely improved the movie.

The film is also note-worthy for starring Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker) as Griff; this was one of his few non-Star Wars roles.

Spoiler

The discovery of the concentration camp at the end of the film is quite harrowing; when Griff discovers the ovens & then opens a door to see a German with a machine gun pointed at him, you are sure he is dead - then the German pulls the trigger, and he has no bullets left. This is followed by Griff shooting him repeatedly, even after his sergeant (Lee Marvin) says, "I think you got him..."

If Warner Brothers isn't going to take the time to do this right, they should just cancel the release. There's only one version of the film that I watch, and I already have it in SD, so this release won't be earning any of my money.

You know, if things are that bad for them financially, it would be nice if they would lighten up on their licensing situation. If they aren't going to put an effort forth, give it to Criterion. Maybe they can spend some of that alleged It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World windfall on restoring a real masterpiece.

Out of curiosity, how much would a restoration project like this cost?

Arrow wrote:Out of curiosity, how much would a restoration project like this cost?

Very hard to give an actual price to. My estimates range from $70,000-$200,000 (but this is very rough). There are many factors at play, not limited to whether it's a 4k or 2k scan; how much color correction/dustbusting would need to be redone from scratch; whether the 2005 AVID version can be conformed to a new scan (which depends on numerous factors, including keycodes, etc. etc. etc.).

The original Reconstruction budget was less than $400,000, but that includes far more hours of work, because ALL the trims/outtakes/etc. had to be scanned and analyzed and matched to the shooting script, etc. All that work has, of course, been done (and as I recall, there are only a few short missing sequences, or sequences which only exist in workprint without sound).

Even a "budget" 2k scan would be acceptable, but another somewhat painful compromise.

Well, we obviously lost the battle on this one. I did eventually receive a direct response from WB's Ned Price in January, stating "I checked with Jeff Baker in our Home Video group and confirmed that unfortunately they are not in a position to remaster the re-constructed version for Blu-Ray due to costs."

Needless to say, I hope that consumers aware of the deficiency of this release do NOT purchase it. Sad.

The Reconstruction is in my top 50 favorite films of all time list. I was really looking forward to this release until I found out what it was. This is a real shame.

RedChannels wrote:

Gregory wrote:Thanks, RedChannels.

captveg wrote:One just hopes that they only delay it rather then cancel it. See: Tom & Jerry Golden Collection Vol. 2

Barring the ideal situation of a redo of the reconstruction in HD, I wouldn't be too disappointed if this release got cancelled. Not much point in a blu release of the studio-butchered version of a film presented as if that's the main version to watch, just because they didn't look ahead to HD when doing the reconstruction.

Absolutely! The fairly deluxe DVD release of the Reconstruction is fine, because... compression issues aside, it's virtually the same resolution as the DigiBeta master which made it. Whereas having that added to a Blu-Ray would just be an insult to buyers, and to Sam's memory. Christa pointed out the it's 70th anniversary of D-Day, too.

I've got a few irons in the fire, still. I hope. I still have this funny feeling that a new scan of the 35mm printing negative (i.e. the film-out of the DigiBeta) might at _least_ yield a result which looks more mushed together, more analog, than a mere port from the DigiBeta. I realize it's a fairly preposterous premise, but... imagine how much cheaper that would be to master than actually re-constructing the reconstruction. I'd love to see some tests done.

It's really a shame that this film isn't getting more love. I've heard that Warner won't license out their stuff to Criterion (or anyone), which is just stupid and sad. And definitely, with D-Day's 70th anniversary coming up, SOMETHING should be done. However, it seems that only The Big Red One, The Longest Day, and Overlord are getting any sort of release for the anniversary, and only The Big Red One and Overlord are getting anything new done (by which I mean, they are both getting their first Blu-ray releases, but with nothing new added). At least Overlord is getting released by Criterion, so I'd imagine it would have a very nice transfer, but Warner is just trying to squeeze money out The Big Red One by giving us a crappy Blu-ray. I do, however, see a couple of glimmers of hope:

-Next year will mark the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII
-The new Star Wars film will be out next year, so Mark Hamill will be back in the limelight in a HUGE way
-Fuller had friends. Famous friends. Friends like Martin Scorsese and Quentin Tarantino, who could actually speak up about this indignity. Plus, Spielberg was known to admire Fuller (going so far as to cast him in a cameo in 1941 - there's a funny little story about that in Fuller's autobio), and he definitely would have watched the D-Day sequence from BRO before doing Saving Private Ryan (a film which I am REALLY surprised is not getting a re-release of ANY sort this year - hell, I don't think TCM's airing it, even [and they HAVE aired it before, which is good, since other channels have started to censor it]).