Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:52 am
Number 2 of all time in just thirty days: $471,493,000...
Maybe it will land somewhere around $550,000,000.
Maybe it will land somewhere around $550,000,000.
https://criterionforum.org/forum/
On the contrary, I think that it's an interesting idea (even if I may never partake myself).Cold Bishop wrote:That may be the dumbest invention I've ever heard of.
Invite strangers to talk over a movie. Worst idea ever.Antoine Doinel wrote:There are rumors floating about, that the BluRay disc of the film will be the first with BD-Live, a largely useless feature that will allow you to simultaneously watch the film "live" with a few other people and chat or talk about the film as it plays.
They had that on the HD DVD for the last Harry Potter, which sounded pretty useless. I'm surprised Warner is trying it again, though maybe with the Dark Knight fan boys/gamers that own PS3s this will prove more successful.Antoine Doinel wrote:There are rumors floating about, that the BluRay disc of the film will be the first with BD-Live, a largely useless feature that will allow you to simultaneously watch the film "live" with a few other people and chat or talk about the film as it plays.
Been doneGrand Illusion wrote:D: Why not just release a bonus audio track with people talking over the important parts to truly replicate the theater experience?
The idea is good, devoting a specific technology to it is silly.Morbii wrote:On the contrary, I think that it's an interesting idea (even if I may never partake myself).
For example, imagine getting a forum group together watching an old silent on Blu Ray with some of the forum members that are well versed on the era.
Are you incapable of putting your thoughts in this discussion forum, where we might actually discuss them?noelbotevera wrote:Hell hath no fury like a fanboy scorned (or: why must Keith Ulrich die?)
wonderfulThe Dark Knight is the fever dream of a white supremacist who listens to way too much Wagner.
Someone fell out of the wrong side of bed this afternoon.Grand Illusion wrote:Are you incapable of putting your thoughts in this discussion forum, where we might actually discuss them?noelbotevera wrote:Hell hath no fury like a fanboy scorned (or: why must Keith Ulrich die?)
What a lame contribution.
Gigantic retardation. It's not like this is a forum for top soil or phase four nuclear energy or something, it's a fucking movie forum!!noelbotevera wrote:It's only a movie.
Should we start a new subforum for these topics or include them in "Non-Cinema Arts?"exte wrote:It's not like this is a forum for top soil or phase four nuclear energy or something
Michelle Pfeiffer didn't exactly do her own backflips in Batman Returns, ya know.exte wrote:How would she move, other than walk?
I read this article today on showbusiness google news, I don't know what 2 believe with this article whether is true or not. But if it's true, why on earth would director Christopher Nolan choose Cher of all actress 2 play Catwoman alongside sexy Christian Bale who plays Batman in the movie. I mean Cher is pensioner, she's 62 years old she's old enough 2 be Christian Bale mum. What is Director Christopher Nolan thinking, about giving that role Catwoman to Cher, to act alongside (Bale as) Batman as his other half Catwoman. This Director can't be serious on this decision regarding the role as Catwoman, is he? Mind you maybe the reason why he might want 2 cast Cher as Catwoman 2 play alongside Christian Bale as Batman as his other half, maybe 2 russell up some feathers in the plot in the storyline. My guess is that the reason why they want 2 hire Cher has Catwoman, the screenwriter has maybe come up with a storyline on the grounds that she will have a toyboy intimate relationship with (Bale) as Batman and yes they will have loads of sex together just how Christian Bale had said he wanted in one of his interviews for the recent Batman Film Dark Knight and also 2 keep audiences gripped all the time 4 the new Batman movie at the Cinemas, so Batman 3 will be another success at the Box Office just like the last 2 Batman movies before it. Because I can't think of any other reason why, the Director would want 2 hire Cher 4 this great role in the film, don't get me wrong Cher is one the best actresses that Hollywood can ever offer in showbusiness, but come on, a role like Catwoman is not suited 4 someone of her age-group. If u read the story of Catwoman in the comic book hero Batman, u will see that Catwoman character is aimed 4 younger woman at least in her 30's. Because if the film is based on the comic story Batman, the directors should make sure that actors are suitable 4 the roles they are playing based on characters that's protrayed in the book. They say in the Article on Google that the director don't want Catwoman 2 be protrayed like what the public saw with Michelle Preffier and Halle Berry in previous Batman and Catwoman movies. But even so Michelle Preffier who played Catwoman years ago, in Tim Burton Batmans Forever film, she was surperb in the role as the sexy feline, because not only that she had good role and story line 2 act in, she was attractive 2 look at and a good actress that played her part 2 the best of her ability and gained good reviews as one of the best actors who played there parts very well alongside Batman in the movie at the time and also she was the right age group 2 play Selena Kyle aka Catwoman. Anyway if this article is true, which I hope it's not, the directorChristopher Nolan should really think about who is employing for that role as Catwoman, because it's a very good and interesting female character 2 play and has a director is not any actress you should hire 2 play the sexy and intelligent female turn feline by night and 2 meet Batmans match physical and emotional character as his soulmate and partner in crime. That's why as a director, u should not hire an actor or actress that public is going 2 find it hard 2 adapt 2, because of physical appearance and age-group not suitable 4 the part they playing, despite there acting ability. Here are suggestions that is right requirements for Catwoman Role first of all she should be a good actress, very nice - looking or attractive 2 look at, young or coming of age group between her late 20's and 30's age group, not someone who is old as a pensioner like Actress and Singer Cher and also Catwoman after 2 have a nice figure or curvy woman shape that brings out her sexappeal more in her catwoman costume or catsuit. No producer should not hire a good actress who is attractive, the right age group 4 the role and have waif-like or size zero figure like Angelina Jolie whose going 2 look more thin in a black catsuit costume because black make u look more slimmer even if you have those extra pounds that u don't want anybody 2 see. But black on skinny or underweight person would not look sexy on screen. That is the reason why beautiful good actresses such as Charlize Theron, Catherine Zeta Jones, Rachel Wiez and Kate Winslet would be suitable 4 the part in their 30 plus age-group and if the producers prefer a mature actress 2 play the part which is no where near their 60's and they look quite good 4 their age group Madeline Stowe, Andie Macdowall, Michelle Preiffer and Lela Rochon who are mature/middle age group such as 40's - 50 would be suitable 4 the Role. Anyway I am done with my comment now, which is worth looking into and 2 be taken seriously if u want 2 see a good catwoman with good characteristics 2 knock us out on the screen in Batman 3.