Anatomie d'une chute (Justine Triet, 2023)
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:33 am
NEON's trailer for Triet's Anatomy of a Fall comes with click-through trigger warnings and a crisis hotline number.
Anatomy of a Fall is an exemplary triumph of both the genre, style, and tone - issuing respectful narrative withholding to merit procedural-mystery pleasures while striking a tone of ambiguity-as-pathway-to-humanism. These qualities support the other, and its the commitment to this latter ethos that makes this a superior version of TÁR. On paper it sounds like a reckless comparison, but the questions it asks of its audience are of a similar thematic ilk, only told by a filmmaker with humbler ambitions, a gentler approach, and comfortability with restraint from blending with its principal character as not to accidentally oversimplify her. I know they had different methods to tackling their subjects, but Field could learn something from Triet's outcome.brundlefly wrote: Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:33 am NEON's trailer for Triet's Anatomy of a Fall comes with click-through trigger warnings and a crisis hotline number.
I was also wow-ed by this one (although I disagree with your TÁR comparison -- they're trying to accomplish two very different things, I think), particularly the performances of Milo Graner and Messi, a worthy Palme Dog winner if ever there was one. I am a bit baffled by how free-wheeling the French legal system appears here, though. I'm an uncultured American, so I could be wrong, but surely no judge would allow THIS much blatant witness leading? Or the sequence with the novel? In fact, the film's one pitfall, for me, is its general handling of the prosecutor, who comes across as SO unsympathetic that the case he's making loses its bite. Maybe that was Triet's intention, but it's a bit heavy-handed if so. Nonetheless, I found the film very compelling in its approach and nuances.therewillbeblus wrote: Sun Oct 15, 2023 4:04 am Anatomy of a Fall is an exemplary triumph of both the genre, style, and tone - issuing respectful narrative withholding to merit procedural-mystery pleasures while striking a tone of ambiguity-as-pathway-to-humanism. These qualities support the other, and its the commitment to this latter ethos that makes this a superior version of TÁR. On paper it sounds like a reckless comparison, but the questions it asks of its audience are of a similar thematic ilk, only told by a filmmaker with humbler ambitions, a gentler approach, and comfortability with restraint from blending with its principal character as not to accidentally oversimplify her. I know they had different methods to tackling their subjects, but Field could learn something from Triet's outcome.

Short program about the dog who plays Snoop, featuring trainer Laura Martin
The comparison to Antonio Campos' HBO adaptation of "The Staircase" is interesting, especially noting similarities in the portrayal of a slightly weird and aloof defendant on trial for an ambiguous spouse death. However, it seems the writer found that "Anatomy" diverges from this comparison halfway through, becoming its own unique narrative. The mention of Sandra Huller's excellent performance adds to the positive assessment of the film's direction.JamesF wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 8:12 am I never thought of Tar as a comparison, but the first half reminded me of Antonio Campos’ recent HBO adaptation of The Staircase, to the extent that I wondered if the film would be playing the same beats (slightly weird and aloof defendant on trial for ambiguous spouse death), just with Sandra Huller being excellent. That would have been fine, but Anatomy changes tack for the better halfway through and firmly becomes its own beast. I certainly share soundchaser’s questions about the French courts though!
And oh my word, that dog