It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 5:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:59 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Matt wrote:
One might even say that Vilmos Zsigmond wrote the book on lens flares with that movie.

László Kovács and Easy Rider! The new guy who is obsessed with Dennis Hopper will back me up on this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:13 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:49 am
Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
The middle school romance and the making of the movie were actually quite nice. Really anything that wasn't running around "action sequences" which is about as exciting to me as brushing one's teeth. Quite a shame, it could have been something much more special.

Still, if you're going to make a movie with a nauseating amount of CGI action, this is definitely the best way to do it. Like, in the sense that there was stuff to actually like. I guess it just depends which way you look at it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:34 pm
Tom Hagen wrote:
Matt wrote:
One might even say that Vilmos Zsigmond wrote the book on lens flares with that movie.
László Kovács and Easy Rider! The new guy who is obsessed with Dennis Hopper will back me up on this.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:51 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Off topic, but have you read John Turturro's Random Roles at the AVClub? His description of Hopper's directing style warms the cockles of my heart.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:55 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:34 pm
Cold Bishop wrote:
Off topic, but have you read John Turturro's Random Roles at the AVClub? His description of Hopper's directing style warms the cockles of my heart.

Thanks for that, being the "new guy who is obsessed with Dennis Hopper" according to Tom's post.

Quote:
That was one of his directions: “fuck.” But he’d say it in all different ways, like, “You fucking do this, and then you fuck it, man! And just fuck it! Fuck it, man! Just fucking fuck it!” I remember Joe Pesci turned to me and said, “Man, that’s directing.”

lol.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:06 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:48 am
Location: KCK
Jeff wrote:
I did see Star Trek, and I certainly noticed the lens flares there, but they actually stood out more to me in Super 8. I think it was because they actually obscured the actors in several scenes. Either way, his use of them is just plain silly. It's like in an effort to develop an auteurial signature, he said, "I know! I'll draw blue lines all over every fucking thing whether it makes sense or not! That'll be 'my thing'."

The one spot in particular they really bothered me was at the gas station. for no particular reason, the majority of the picture is dark sky but there are ridiculous blue flares all over the screen. it was just distracting and pointless.

but then again, my wife leaned over shortly after that scene and whispered "I love how he made all those light things on the screne!" #-o


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:17 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm
I saw this tonight, in pretty much ideal conditions- on a blanket, at the drive in, on a nice balmy evening. It moved well, as I think everything I've seen from Abrams did, but I felt as though the emotional arc and the monster movie stuff weren't well integrated, and the monster aspects gave you just enough information to feel full of holes-
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Why were the military moving it? Why did they have its ship on the same train? If it could control metal, how did they keep it contained? What was it doing with all those hanging bodies- particularly if they could all psychically contact it and have it understand they meant it no harm? Why did the military let the science teacher go with all that secure footage in the first place? What happened to the fire they set? If they were so incompetent they couldn't figure out a subterranean creature would be maybe underground, how did they catch it in the first place? Etc, etc, etc.

None of them are really questions that matter, but essentially I felt like the characterization of the monster didn't quite work- it's viewpoint wasn't clear, but we had too much information about what was going on to feel like it was purely alien.

That said, I thought the kids' performances were great, particularly the leads- the backstory with the mother was executed a little clumsily at times, but the actors managed to sell it pretty well, and the relationship between them seemed very sweet and genuine. I'll be sad if this winds up being on my top ten for the year, but it's a nicely ambitious idea for a summer blockbuster and I'd be happy to see more movies work this hard at achieving real characters and a well-realized environment before blowing shit up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:53 am 

Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:46 am
Looking at the date of the last post in this thread has made me realise how late I am to the game with this one!, No wonder I had to travel a bit further afield to see this film at a decent time! Anyway, I saw Super 8 at the weekend and really enjoyed it. Children make the best adventure film protagonists! There's something about the fact it's young film nerds running around and dodging falling train parts during that absurdly cinematic train crash scene earlier on makes it all so much more enjoyable.

I also enjoyed the fact that two vital exposition scenes feature them watching home movies (the scene with Alice and Joe in his bedroom, and discovery of lab footage later on). The fact they are using the real life chaos (not REAL real life of course) as sets for their own film made me think about how much films such as Hiroshi Shimizu's 'Children Of The Beehive' and Jacques Tourneur's 'Berlin Express' were greatly improved by their authentic war torn backdrops (I'm in no way comparing the kids' finished film to those two of course!)

Agreed on the general dislike for lens flare. However, the screen captures from Close Encounters definitely helped put it into context, and alleviate that dislike a bit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
And you thought Paramount dropped the ball on the Up In the Air coverart...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:23 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Japan's coverart looks better, except they are kind of spoiling the ending with it.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 11:23 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Jeez. Not too much better. Why is it so hard to make a good cover for this?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:20 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Seattleish
manicsounds wrote:
Japan's coverart looks better

I wouldn't say so, it's pretty generic. I'd agree with the idea they haven't found a really good poster/image for this yet, but I like the one mfunk linked to best of all so far. If they pushed the idea further and really just did it up as a dummy kodak box instead of just kinda sorta doing it, I'd be happy. Too esoteric for mass consumption I suppose, so you get this half-measure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:32 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
If only there was a thread to discuss terrible covers...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:55 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Well, in all fairness, I think that thread exists because most of the films discussed in it don't have a thread dedicated to them.

How dare someone discuss the home video release of Super 8 in the thread for Super 8!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:14 pm
mfunk9786 wrote:


I'm wondering if it's an attempted riff on the old Kodak 8mm packaging.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:48 am
You're wondering?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:31 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
The reason I mentioned the other thread is that we've already had this exact discussion


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Touché


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 7:53 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Well, to the people who picked it up, looks like that bright yellow is just the slipcase. Inside artwork is nearer the original posters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection