Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Cinema Guild, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
TechnicolorAcid
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2023 7:43 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2076 Post by TechnicolorAcid » Sat Nov 30, 2024 2:42 pm

I guess you could say the orders KEEP coming.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2077 Post by swo17 » Sat Nov 30, 2024 3:19 pm

And now 450. This thing's going to be gone in an hour
domino harvey wrote:
Fri Nov 29, 2024 12:20 pm
jazzo wrote:
Fri Nov 29, 2024 12:14 pm

And I suppose I have to ask, are the genre nerds now so desperate that they're reclaiming Sliver, for fuck's sake?
There is an enormous portion of physical media buyers who will simply buy anything they ever remember appearing on cable in the 80s or 90s. Literally anything. Once you realize this, a lot of these releases start making (financial) sense
Isn't this also why Trump won? "You remember him from the '90s! Now uncensored!"

TVC15
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:36 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2078 Post by TVC15 » Sat Nov 30, 2024 3:48 pm

swo17 wrote:
Sat Nov 30, 2024 2:36 pm
The Keep LE is down to 860 copies
99 now

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2079 Post by swo17 » Sat Nov 30, 2024 4:00 pm

And it's gone

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2080 Post by MichaelB » Sat Nov 30, 2024 6:24 pm

I'm definitely in the "nostalgic glow" camp - it's certainly an artistic failure (and was arguably irreparably hobbled from the moment VFX genius Wally Veevers unexpectedly died just as post-production was starting), but much more towards the "weirdly fascinating" end of the scale. I suspect I'll be spending more time with the first half than the second, where it seriously falls apart, but I can't wait to see it in a halfway decent copy for the first time - for decades, pan-and-scan VHS was my only option.

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2081 Post by beamish14 » Sat Nov 30, 2024 6:56 pm

It’s just so puzzling that not even scenes from the television version of The Keep are on this release, but that might be Mann’s doing

User avatar
luxta
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2021 5:16 am

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2082 Post by luxta » Sun Dec 01, 2024 7:37 am

beamish14 wrote:
Sat Nov 30, 2024 6:56 pm
...but that might be Mann’s doing
Why? Maybe there just wasn't any good material.

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2083 Post by beamish14 » Sun Dec 01, 2024 1:40 pm

luxta wrote:
Sun Dec 01, 2024 7:37 am
beamish14 wrote:
Sat Nov 30, 2024 6:56 pm
...but that might be Mann’s doing
Why? Maybe there just wasn't any good material.

I mean, it would’ve been nice to have stuff like this in HD

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2084 Post by MichaelB » Sun Dec 01, 2024 2:53 pm

You can bet your bottom dollar that VS tried to get hold of everything conceivable, but if Michael Mann and/or Paramount said no, that is very much that.

And whether that material even survives in a format that qualifies as "high definition" is an open question in itself. When I've worked on Universal-sourced TV versions, I can think of just one occasion when we managed to get our hands on actual film footage (Secret Ceremony), but otherwise the best we could hope for is a standard definition 4:3-framed video master - that's literally all they still have on the shelf.

User avatar
JamesF
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:36 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2085 Post by JamesF » Sun Dec 01, 2024 5:47 pm

Yes, just to echo that major studios (if it is Paramount who kiboshed the inclusion of the TV ending along with any other deleted footage) are often frustratingly inconsistent with their policies regarding cut footage as extras, and no citing of precedent or even offering to sign a quitclaim to take on any legal hit will make a difference - if they don’t want to stick their neck out by letting a licensee feature material that may not entirely be filmmaker-approved (if it was never finished) or isn’t legally cleared for home video, that is indeed that. I’m positive VS would have included any additional footage if they could for The Keep or Sliver.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2086 Post by MichaelB » Sun Dec 01, 2024 5:58 pm

Major studios aren't absolutely impossible to reason with - Sony, for instance, have just conceded on appeal that their usual ban on using screengrabs instead of official production stills was never intended to cover a situation like an extra on Indicator's upcoming Edge of Eternity in which José Arroyo deconstructs the film while pausing individual shots every so often to analyse them in more detail - but for the most part it is indeed their property and their rules, and you have no choice but to stick to those rules because they're contractually enforced.

It can't be emphasised enough that ambitious boutique labels - and VS certainly qualifies here - will typically start every project with a wishlist of a ton of stuff that they want to include, and will have had to whittle it down deeply reluctantly once it becomes clear that certain things just aren't going to be possible. Or of course they could have simply not bothered, but for all sorts of reasons I think that's a much less likely scenario - not least because they're fully aware of how sought-after a title this is.

User avatar
thekeystobarton
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2024 2:48 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2087 Post by thekeystobarton » Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:34 pm

I went ahead and bought their UHD of "Who Killed Teddy Bear" just because how stacked the release is for an admittedly uneven film. If anyone out there has not seen this and is on the bubble about whether to add it into your cart for the sales, I will just very briefly add my two-cents to say it is worth a bind-buy:
SpoilerShow
Ironically, the least believable scenes are generally any of the ones which include Jan Murray, even though it is in many of his scenes that many interesting (and proto-feminist) contradictions about the level of female agency desired by the "normal" everyday single working woman get examined (albeit a bit too obviously at times and without much assist from Prowse's limited acting chops). The overall tone is far and away much more like if "No Way to Treat a Lady" had been adapted even just three years later. There is no way to downplay the uneven-ness, except perhaps to mitigate by saying the film faced many cuts during filming and in post-production. Also, the almost Law and Order:SVU approach to the character of the sister to Sal Mineo's character does nothing to add to the film since the film quickly spoils any possibility of Mineo's character being a red herring in his very first shot in the bar (could his ring *be* any more obvious?!). Now if the purpose of having the sister was not to throw off suspicion from Mineo, then the tone feels akin to Guy Green's, "A Patch of Blue"- which means you'll either hate it or maybe accept it but certainly not love it. In my opinion, the camera work and sharp humor at times makes this feel like a John Waters piece without his typical boistrousness, or what a grand dame guignol film would feel like by taking the focus off the older woman and making that character merely a supporting player/red herring (and in this case a lesbian with a thing for fur coats). Teddy Bear rightfully deserves props for its almost Weegee-like use of New York exteriors, much like Dmytryk was doing the same year with "Mirage," and for the flashback moments for Mineo which owe so much to Aldrich's Hush, Hush Sweet Charlotte I am amazed that more people did not mention it in the wake of FX's Feud. The moments in Teddy Bear where there are true insights into sexuality, both for the "vanilla" female protagonist and for Mineo's voyeur (and indeed there are many) I would say do lift a film out of mere indie-shlock/B-movies realm, and kept in context of the year of the filming itself, are remarkably astute, on the level of the scene with the psychologist at the end of Psycho.
There's so little scholarly material out there on this film that it is hard to know what exactly is in the restored scenes that apparently have never been released before (I re-read the section in Michaud's biography of Mineo about Teddy Bear, and even there, not too much to clarify the cut scenes). It would be wonderful to know if the Cinématographe people actually did get the one-and-only Phoebe Cates to talk about to them about her dad and this film even if it was just off the record (her involvement is not listed in the specs for the supplements).

User avatar
senseabove
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:07 am

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2088 Post by senseabove » Mon Dec 02, 2024 9:22 pm

thekeystobarton wrote:
Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:34 pm
There's so little scholarly material out there on this film that it is hard to know what exactly is in the restored scenes that apparently have never been released before (I re-read the section in Michaud's biography of Mineo about Teddy Bear, and even there, not too much to clarify the cut scenes).
This blog post, linked from DVDBeaver, is the only delineation of cuts that I've found, though it's unclear if the poster is citing from memory or had access to a 16mm print or what—plus they have a screencap of the unblurred credits that reverse image search thinks only exists in that blog post.

Another wrinkle is that all the screenings I can find evidence of in the past decade—New Bev, Film Forum, Roxy, UW Cinematheque—cite a runtime of 94 minutes, which is the uncensored runtime, though none of them tout that it's an "uncensored print," while of those, the two that list a print source (New Bev, UW Cinematheque) say it came from Wisconsin Center for Film and Theater Research, who themselves list a runtime of 90 minutes!

Really hope there's more info on how they tracked the original materials down in the booklet...

User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2089 Post by dwk » Tue Dec 03, 2024 1:14 pm

Partner Label titles:
A Little More Flesh (Art Label)
Blood-A-Rama Triple Frightmare II (AGFA)
Candy Mountain (Film Movement)
Carnage for Christmas (Dark Star)
Cash Calls Hell (Film Movement)
Chris Claremont's X-Men (ETR Media)
Close Your Eyes (Film Movement)
The Coffee Table (Cinephobia Releasing)
Dad & Step-Dad (Nobudge)
Death Laughs Among Us: The Complete Works of John Schnall (VHSHitfest)
Dogs in Quicksand (Saturn's Core)
Hippo (Memory)
Hundreds of Beavers (Cartuna)
Kuso (Shudder)
The Line (Utopia)
Maybe It's Love (Kani)
No Home Movie (Icarus Films)
Orders (Canadian International Pictures)
The Sacrifice Game (Shudder)
Starve Acre (Brainstorm Media)
Sweet Sweet Lonly Girl (Yellow Veil Pictures)
Larry Kent's Vancouver Trilogy (The Bitter Ash, Sweet Substitute, and When Tomorrow Dies.)(Canadian International Pictures)
The Tales for All Bundle (The Christmas Martian, The Dog Who Stopped the War, and The Great Land of Small)(Canadian International Pictures)

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2090 Post by yoloswegmaster » Tue Dec 03, 2024 1:29 pm

dwk wrote:
Tue Dec 03, 2024 1:14 pm
Maybe It's Love (Kani)
I suppose this confirms that Kani now have a deal with Shaw Bros. Maybe they will pick up some of the titles that I've been requesting on here.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2091 Post by swo17 » Tue Dec 03, 2024 1:46 pm

There were like 400 LE copies of Hundreds of Beavers left half an hour ago but now they're all gone

User avatar
TechnicolorAcid
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2023 7:43 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2092 Post by TechnicolorAcid » Tue Dec 03, 2024 1:50 pm

swo17 wrote:
Tue Dec 03, 2024 1:46 pm
There were like 400 LE copies of Hundreds of Beavers left half an hour ago but now they're all gone
Those damn beavers!

User avatar
jazzo
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:02 am

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2093 Post by jazzo » Tue Dec 03, 2024 2:12 pm

Some advice from my provincial government on dealing with them:

https://www.ontario.ca/page/preventing- ... ts-beavers

Alls I can say is, The Orders (Les Ordres) from CIP this month looks to be la sortie média physique de la putain d'année!

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2094 Post by beamish14 » Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:00 pm

Les Ordres is absolutely massive from Canadian International. You’d be hard-pressed to find a top 10 Canadian features of all time list that doesn’t include it

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2095 Post by beamish14 » Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:00 pm

Kuso does feature a cockroach coming out of George Clinton’s anus. I highly recommend it

User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:22 am
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2096 Post by CSM126 » Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:08 pm

Well, okay. I said I was done after Goodbar, The Keep and feardotcom but Candy Mountain is a dear favorite of mine and I am glad to retire my Republic VHS*, so yeah I snagged it.

*Although I will always have a soft spot for that garishly pastel cover.

Bunuel
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2024 5:42 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2097 Post by Bunuel » Tue Dec 03, 2024 6:14 pm

I don't know anything about John Schnall, but that trailer sold me on it. Always down for some weirdo animation.

User avatar
andyli
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2098 Post by andyli » Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:46 pm

Is Candy Mountain going to feature the botched 2K restoration people talked about earlier on this forum?

kekid
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:55 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2099 Post by kekid » Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:36 pm

I am out of the loop on "Looking for Mr. Goodbar 4K." Is it sold out already?
When I clicked on the link I was sent by VS I got Oops message.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Vinegar Syndrome and Their Partner Labels

#2100 Post by domino harvey » Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:42 pm

They’re only selling partner releases for the rest of the month

Post Reply