One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
- Boosmahn
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:08 pm
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
The covers for The Wages of Fear and Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence also use shots close to the endings. (And I think the booklet art for The Naked Kiss portrays a scene late in the film? I haven't seen it yet. Edit: nope, it's from the opening scene!)
- TMDaines
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:01 pm
- Location: Stretford, Manchester
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
People telling you certain images are spoilers are far bigger criminals than otherwise innocuous images being spoilers in hindsight. We've had this discussion before about another poster or cover, where people screamed "IT'S A SPOILER" and those of those who hadn't seen the film were only spoiled by the accuser.
Nobody is having Parasite spoiled by the CC cover. People may well be able to get a spoiler from this thread title and the opening post though.
Nobody is having Parasite spoiled by the CC cover. People may well be able to get a spoiler from this thread title and the opening post though.
-
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 11:58 am
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
It ain’t a spoiler but it’s a bad cover.
Posters aren’t the worst offenders today. It is the trailers. They basically summarize the movie in 2 mins for you.
Posters aren’t the worst offenders today. It is the trailers. They basically summarize the movie in 2 mins for you.
- Michael Kerpan
- Spelling Bee Champeen
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
- Location: New England
- Contact:
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
TMD -- Great point. One has to know quite a bit about a film before a stray picture can be seen as a spoiler.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
These things are always fraught - I personally think showing the titular Wicker Man on the cover of The Wicker Man was a bit too much, but its on almost every poster and cover of every home video release, so I guess it seemingly does not matter!
The worst example I can remember was an early 1990s trailer for a television screening of Working Girl:
But that is another example of a situation where telling you that the seemingly innocuous at first glance image is the final shot of the film might actually lead to the person pointing that out themselves getting a furious backlash from it, instead of the more deserving of punishment people who put that shot in there in the first place!
But its not a completely one way or the other situation. It is nice to have imagery used that then deepens and enriches an experience of a piece of work when you return to the title screen of the DVD or walk past the poster in the lobby of the cinema, or pull out a disc from your library, even if it can be a fine line between being smart and subtle and overly arch about it. And I suppose that you can only really be spoiled the once (unless you forget the events of the film!), and that the best films still have a lot to offer to a viewer even after their nominally crucial 'plot events' have been revealed (i.e. the reason why it is so enjoyable to re-watch films multiple times. For example I know the events that occur in Jagged Edge but am also looking forward to revisiting it again to see the way everything plays out). It is just that it can be annoying to be unavoidably subjected to such things when you do not wish to be (I am still glad I saw the original Planet of the Apes on television rather than seeing any of the spoilery home video covers! The same with seeing Psycho underage for maximum impact). But at the same time there can be a lot of enjoyment to get from a package like that which has a little extra subtle twist in its cover design to make those in the know smile.
The worst example I can remember was an early 1990s trailer for a television screening of Working Girl:
SpoilerShow
Which lingered on the final shot of Melanie Griffiths on the phone whilst reclining in a big chair in her swanky corner office. Which I guess is not particularly a big spoiler that her character eventually succeeds and reaches the top of her chosen profession, but if you then watched the film about the character struggling throughout the film whilst having the memory of that trailer in mind it kind of undercut all of the dramatic tension a bit! I'm pretty sure whoever made that trailer did so under the "nobody is going to notice we've shown the final shot of the film here" belief as well!
But its not a completely one way or the other situation. It is nice to have imagery used that then deepens and enriches an experience of a piece of work when you return to the title screen of the DVD or walk past the poster in the lobby of the cinema, or pull out a disc from your library, even if it can be a fine line between being smart and subtle and overly arch about it. And I suppose that you can only really be spoiled the once (unless you forget the events of the film!), and that the best films still have a lot to offer to a viewer even after their nominally crucial 'plot events' have been revealed (i.e. the reason why it is so enjoyable to re-watch films multiple times. For example I know the events that occur in Jagged Edge but am also looking forward to revisiting it again to see the way everything plays out). It is just that it can be annoying to be unavoidably subjected to such things when you do not wish to be (I am still glad I saw the original Planet of the Apes on television rather than seeing any of the spoilery home video covers! The same with seeing Psycho underage for maximum impact). But at the same time there can be a lot of enjoyment to get from a package like that which has a little extra subtle twist in its cover design to make those in the know smile.
Last edited by colinr0380 on Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:34 pm, edited 8 times in total.
- criterionoop
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:46 am
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
I have to agree with the people who are saying that the Morse code isn't a spoiler.
If the Morse code was translated into a lengthy description of the ending, then it would be a major spoiler. But since it's only translated into "Parasite," it's akin to translating "The Miracle Worker" into American Sign Language, or translating "The Whistlers" into the whistling language you hear in the trailer. It's benign because you know it exists, but you don't know the context in which it exists. I'm hoping that it will be a slip case because the poster art was great already (and I would say that the poster is more of a spoiler than the Morse code - the poster gives you context of location and characters, while the Morse code is stripped of all that).
Going back to my point about 45 YEARS and the individuals who are saying that the cover of the film is a spoiler/we shouldn't have spoilers of any level: this is confusing because the implication is that in order to avoid knowing beforehand that (and I'm only putting a spoiler because I don't really feel like dealing with the blow back of not putting a spoiler)
that means you have not read festival reviews, actual reviews, watched the trailer, read social media posts, read forum posts, read anything really because most everything makes mention of the "spoiler" (which again I contend is not a spoiler because it isn't a plot twist, it isn't an ending, it's really a narrative impetus that is revealed early on in order to set up the framework of the film).
It really is the shock vs suspense debate about a theoretical bomb under the table (no, the spoiler of 45 YEARS isn't a bomb under the table): Is the filmmaker withholding information of the bomb in order to surprise you when it explodes, or does the filmmaker openly tell you the bomb exists in order to elicit an emotional and psychological response.
If the Morse code was translated into a lengthy description of the ending, then it would be a major spoiler. But since it's only translated into "Parasite," it's akin to translating "The Miracle Worker" into American Sign Language, or translating "The Whistlers" into the whistling language you hear in the trailer. It's benign because you know it exists, but you don't know the context in which it exists. I'm hoping that it will be a slip case because the poster art was great already (and I would say that the poster is more of a spoiler than the Morse code - the poster gives you context of location and characters, while the Morse code is stripped of all that).
Going back to my point about 45 YEARS and the individuals who are saying that the cover of the film is a spoiler/we shouldn't have spoilers of any level: this is confusing because the implication is that in order to avoid knowing beforehand that (and I'm only putting a spoiler because I don't really feel like dealing with the blow back of not putting a spoiler)
SpoilerShow
Geoff's girlfriend froze to death and they find her body on the eve of his and Kate's 45th anniversary,
It really is the shock vs suspense debate about a theoretical bomb under the table (no, the spoiler of 45 YEARS isn't a bomb under the table): Is the filmmaker withholding information of the bomb in order to surprise you when it explodes, or does the filmmaker openly tell you the bomb exists in order to elicit an emotional and psychological response.
-
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:23 pm
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
The baby pacifier poster for Man Bites Dog is probably the most notorious example I can think of that does something like this, but there the false advertising is exactly the point.therewillbeblus wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 6:56 pmI was waiting for that moment to happen and when it failed to present itself, became hung up on the false advertising. I eventually got over it.
-
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:07 pm
- Location: Bracara Augusta, Portugal
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
I'm not too bothered by spoilers as a rule. However, one instance a picture in Shindo's Naked Island booklet in MOC dvd (don't own the blu) ruined the movie for me. Usually, i'd read the booklet before watching the movie, but upon seeing the true extent of the damage a major spoiler could do to a movie, i started reading the booklets after watching. To this day.
-
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2020 2:49 am
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
Isn't the entire cover a spoiler, much more than the code? The original poster shows even more than the few dots and dashes which seems better - and even if you figure out there is a morse code (I actually didn't notice until reading this thread) and decipher it, spelling the movie title is like...ok. Once you see the movie and it clicks then I think that's smart.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
The title Man Bites Dog is itself false advertising, as nowhere in the film is a dog bitten by a man - and it's not even a translation of the original C'est arrivé près de chez vous ("It Happened Near You").
But I think both the title and the poster are inspired - the title brilliantly encapsulates in three words (totalling just eleven letters!) the film's core themes of sudden, unexpected and absurd violence and tabloid-style shock-horror media sensationalism (the title of course being a famous illustration of how to write a good headline - "dog bites man" being wholly uninteresting but "man bites dog" being "whoa!"). And of course the accompanying image does that too. True, the killer doesn't actually shoot a baby at any point in the onscreen narrative, but who's to say he might not have done so in the past?
Incidentally, in France the poster was subtly altered so that the baby's dummy was replaced with a set of false teeth. Co-director/star Benoît Poelvoorde said that this was clearly because "in France it's more acceptable to kill old people than babies".
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
Man bites dog is also a popular idiom at least in America. I’d be shocked if any American took the title literally rather than as a reference to the idiom.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: One Bad Appal: The Parasite Cover and Spoilers in Criterion Cover Art
My point is that because nobody would take the title literally, it's not a huge stretch to expect them not to take the poster image literally either.
I'd love to know who came up with the English title - I know it wasn't any of the filmmakers because I attended a Q&A with them way back in 1992 and someone asked why the English title was so different. I forget who specifically replied, but they said it wasn't their title but they were completely happy with it because the original was apparently a rather parochial in-joke that only Belgians would get. (At the time of production, they never envisaged an audience outside Belgium.)