Cinematic Rückenfigur

A subforum to discuss film culture and criticism.
Message
Author
Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:43 am

#26 Post by Cinesimilitude » Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:04 am

I find that with all the photos I take that resemble whats being discussed here, the greater the scope the better. That is to say I'd rather see as much landscape as possible without it containing any distractions from the primary subject. I'm not sure if it's a certain solitude or loneliness that I'm going for, but I just like seeing man vs nature in a one on one setting. So with that in mind the only reason your last shot seems out of place to me is the lack of space around the subject.

And while we're posting them anyways, has anyone else got a flickr account that posts here? do add me as a contact.

ChrisW
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: Eastern Eye (Madman Entertainment)
Contact:

#27 Post by ChrisW » Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:18 am

Yeah, there's lots of good examples on Flickr. For me, this is the best rückenfigur shot I've seen on there - absolutely nails it...

Image
(Photo by George Draskóy)

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

#28 Post by zedz » Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:17 pm

Scharphedin2 wrote:I am not familiar with Spider Forrest, or, the aesthetic definitions of what a rückenfigur is or is not supposed to be or express. However, strictly based on the stills in ChrisW's post, would this not qualify more as subjective use of the camera? And/or, as Chris suggests himself, a use of the camera to create suspense?
I also haven't seen the film, but I think there's a difference between this and subjective camerawork, as the camera's point of view is not that of a character, but is nevertheless connected (at a slight remove) to the point of view of the character in the frame. We're seeing what they're seeing, but we're seeing more, because we're also seeing them seeing it - there's a layer of reflexivity.

A film that uses a very similar technique, but which I wouldn't associate with Friedrich, is the Dardennes' The Son, in which we're forever trailing the protagonist around, at very close quarters. It's much closer to subjective camerawork than the Friedrich-like examples cited above, but there's still that crucial distance, and much of the film's power comes from not being in the head of the protagonist. And, as Scharphedin says, there's something about this position of seeing / not seeing, identifying / not identifying that lends itself to suspense.

This could probably all be much more clearly illustrated by Venn diagrams.

User avatar
Kinsayder
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: UK

#29 Post by Kinsayder » Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:34 am

In the first half of Vertigo, Madeleine, the "lonely wanderer", is filmed repeatedly from behind in contemplative poses that seem to evoke the compositions of Friedrich:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

These are all point-of-view (POV) shots, but not Madeleine's POV: this is Scottie watching Madeleine, who remains remote to us because we are not "in her head" (to use zedz' terminology). This is different, therefore, from the familiar POV shot which has us peering over the shoulder of the character whose POV we're seeing; but closer, I think, to Friedrich, whose figures also have a sense of mystery and distance:

Image

User avatar
jesus the mexican boi
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:09 am
Location: South of the Capitol of Texas

#30 Post by jesus the mexican boi » Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:59 am

God... those Vertigo shots are so gorgeous. I love this concept, this image. Leave it to the Germans to give it a name, but as these examples show, it transcends borders and tongues.

I was going to post Herzog screenshots but I'm all thumbs at such things. Still, the image of Klaus Kinski as Fitzcarraldo watching the ship being hauled up the mountain in the fog seems like a ruckenfiger deadringer.

User avatar
backstreetsbackalright
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: 313

#31 Post by backstreetsbackalright » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:46 pm

I'm surprised our Michael Mann fans haven't chimed in. His films are thick with these kinds of shots. Take this one from Heat's DVD menus, even:

Image

ChrisW
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: Eastern Eye (Madman Entertainment)
Contact:

#32 Post by ChrisW » Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:42 am

I recently watched The Proposition and noticed that it regularly uses rückenfigur throughout. All the screengrabs here are from scenes that spend a substantial amount of time on the frame.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

#33 Post by HerrSchreck » Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:01 am

tryavna wrote:I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade here, but aren't some you guys defining rückenfigur a little broadly? I mean, surely not all filmmakers have the rückenfigur image in mind every single time they film somebody with their back to the camera..
Amen. The caps up to the point of this post by travna were getting absurd. You could post caps from just about every movie ever made when someone turns their backs to the camera or is seeing what the camera sees.

Necessary-- A solitary melding into or identification with environs, an emotional distance.. a melancholic or mercenary state?

Certainly not a shot of going to the store to buy milk where the camera happens to catch you from the rear for a second.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

#34 Post by Michael Kerpan » Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:16 pm

I think the Proposition grabs are highly pertinent. No going out to the store to buy milk in these. ;~}

Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:43 am

#35 Post by Cinesimilitude » Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:31 pm

Oddly enough, the opening shot of the first script I wrote has the main character entering frame left, with his back to the screen. He's going to 7-11 to buy milk. Hell, the title is "1% or 2?". I just find that funny.

Post Reply