Cinematic Rückenfigur
-
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:43 am
I find that with all the photos I take that resemble whats being discussed here, the greater the scope the better. That is to say I'd rather see as much landscape as possible without it containing any distractions from the primary subject. I'm not sure if it's a certain solitude or loneliness that I'm going for, but I just like seeing man vs nature in a one on one setting. So with that in mind the only reason your last shot seems out of place to me is the lack of space around the subject.
And while we're posting them anyways, has anyone else got a flickr account that posts here? do add me as a contact.
And while we're posting them anyways, has anyone else got a flickr account that posts here? do add me as a contact.
-
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:54 pm
- Location: Eastern Eye (Madman Entertainment)
- Contact:
- zedz
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm
I also haven't seen the film, but I think there's a difference between this and subjective camerawork, as the camera's point of view is not that of a character, but is nevertheless connected (at a slight remove) to the point of view of the character in the frame. We're seeing what they're seeing, but we're seeing more, because we're also seeing them seeing it - there's a layer of reflexivity.Scharphedin2 wrote:I am not familiar with Spider Forrest, or, the aesthetic definitions of what a rückenfigur is or is not supposed to be or express. However, strictly based on the stills in ChrisW's post, would this not qualify more as subjective use of the camera? And/or, as Chris suggests himself, a use of the camera to create suspense?
A film that uses a very similar technique, but which I wouldn't associate with Friedrich, is the Dardennes' The Son, in which we're forever trailing the protagonist around, at very close quarters. It's much closer to subjective camerawork than the Friedrich-like examples cited above, but there's still that crucial distance, and much of the film's power comes from not being in the head of the protagonist. And, as Scharphedin says, there's something about this position of seeing / not seeing, identifying / not identifying that lends itself to suspense.
This could probably all be much more clearly illustrated by Venn diagrams.
- Kinsayder
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: UK
In the first half of Vertigo, Madeleine, the "lonely wanderer", is filmed repeatedly from behind in contemplative poses that seem to evoke the compositions of Friedrich:
These are all point-of-view (POV) shots, but not Madeleine's POV: this is Scottie watching Madeleine, who remains remote to us because we are not "in her head" (to use zedz' terminology). This is different, therefore, from the familiar POV shot which has us peering over the shoulder of the character whose POV we're seeing; but closer, I think, to Friedrich, whose figures also have a sense of mystery and distance:
These are all point-of-view (POV) shots, but not Madeleine's POV: this is Scottie watching Madeleine, who remains remote to us because we are not "in her head" (to use zedz' terminology). This is different, therefore, from the familiar POV shot which has us peering over the shoulder of the character whose POV we're seeing; but closer, I think, to Friedrich, whose figures also have a sense of mystery and distance:
- jesus the mexican boi
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:09 am
- Location: South of the Capitol of Texas
God... those Vertigo shots are so gorgeous. I love this concept, this image. Leave it to the Germans to give it a name, but as these examples show, it transcends borders and tongues.
I was going to post Herzog screenshots but I'm all thumbs at such things. Still, the image of Klaus Kinski as Fitzcarraldo watching the ship being hauled up the mountain in the fog seems like a ruckenfiger deadringer.
I was going to post Herzog screenshots but I'm all thumbs at such things. Still, the image of Klaus Kinski as Fitzcarraldo watching the ship being hauled up the mountain in the fog seems like a ruckenfiger deadringer.
- backstreetsbackalright
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:49 pm
- Location: 313
-
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:54 pm
- Location: Eastern Eye (Madman Entertainment)
- Contact:
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am
Amen. The caps up to the point of this post by travna were getting absurd. You could post caps from just about every movie ever made when someone turns their backs to the camera or is seeing what the camera sees.tryavna wrote:I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade here, but aren't some you guys defining rückenfigur a little broadly? I mean, surely not all filmmakers have the rückenfigur image in mind every single time they film somebody with their back to the camera..
Necessary-- A solitary melding into or identification with environs, an emotional distance.. a melancholic or mercenary state?
Certainly not a shot of going to the store to buy milk where the camera happens to catch you from the rear for a second.
- Michael Kerpan
- Spelling Bee Champeen
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
- Location: New England
- Contact:
-
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:43 am