Powell and Pressburger (UK releases)
- Rsdio
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 11:42 am
- Location: UK
So, as someone who only owns the Carlton release of The Red Shoes, what would be the best way to hoover up most of the others? At the moment I'm leaning towards getting the 9-disc HMV set for £15 then the Network Black Narcissus and the Criterion Tales of Hoffmann (or possibly waiting to see what the upcoming Optimum is like). The Criterion of 49th Parallel has thrown a spanner in the works of my thinking though, I don't tend to double-dip on things..
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
Amazon UK has the cover art up for the new Peeping Tom, and interestingly enough you can also view Scorsese's introduction.
Can't wait for this release. Though it looks like they're really playing off the whole 'British Pyscho' idea with the cover art.
Can't wait for this release. Though it looks like they're really playing off the whole 'British Pyscho' idea with the cover art.
- Gordon
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:03 am
- jt
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:47 am
- Location: zurich
That's exactly what I did and I'm very happy, I got the 9-discer as it was much cheaper than the new 11 disc set and I already had Narcissus.Rsdio wrote:At the moment I'm leaning towards getting the 9-disc HMV set for £15 then the Network Black Narcissus and the Criterion Tales of Hoffmann (or possibly waiting to see what the upcoming Optimum is like). The Criterion of 49th Parallel has thrown a spanner in the works of my thinking though, I don't tend to double-dip on things..
Seeing as it is basically the price of a single CC, you shouldn't hesitate. I also don't like double dipping unless absolutely necessary but the extras and artwork on the new 49th Parallel are making me rethink my policy...
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
DVDManiacs reviews the new UK SE of Peeping Tom.
Strange review; he tears into it for the video while at the same time saying that it's an improvement over the many previous releases. Also there isn't a word about the most important extra, Ian Christie's commentary-- was it dropped? Sure as hell hope not.Lino wrote:DVDManiacs reviews the new UK SE of Peeping Tom.
This guy also claims that Peeping Tom's OAR is 1.78, is that true? I thought it was 1.66?
- nick
- grace thought I was a failure
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:42 am
- Location: Rochester, NY
Actually he makes note of them not using the correct aspect ratioGreathinker wrote:This guy also claims that Peeping Tom's OAR is 1.78, is that true? I thought it was 1.66?
The only problem with this is that the Criterion, although stated on the box at 1.66:1, is actually 1.78:1 as seen over here.DVDManiacs.net wrote:Anamorphically presented at 1.78:1 which looks more like 1.73:1 here as it is matted at the sides, Optimum has missed a trick here in not using the OAR like the existing Criterion disc.
I don't understand what you're getting at Nick. He claims Peeping Tom's OAR is 1.78 like the Criterion, whether they advertised it at 1.66 or not. I'm wondering what the actual OAR is for this film, since its already obvious from the review that optimum didn't get it right.
Another, more optimistic review at DVD Outsider
Another, more optimistic review at DVD Outsider
- Tommaso
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am
The caps on dvdmaniacs again support my assumption that 1.66 is correct. I find the framing at the top far too tight. The colours, however, seem to be far more natural than the reddish Criterion, but I guess we will have to wait for a Beaver comparison to come to final conclusions. I feel urged to double dip, though, simply for the Christie commentary. His job on CC's "Canterbury Tale" and "IKWIG" was plain fabulous.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
If analysis of a captured frame in Photoshop is a reliable guide, the aspect ratio of the Optimum DVD is about 1.73:1. I think that's probably pretty accurate - even by eye, it's obviously narrower than 1.78:1 (for starters, there are black bars at the sides of the anamorphic frame), but not quite narrow enough for full 1.66:1. (UPDATE: Just read the DVD Maniacs review, which also claims 1.73:1. I suspect great minds are thinking alike.)
The Christie commentary is well worth a listen. I'm loath to draw direct comparisons between it and the Laura Mulvey commentary on the Criterion disc (for starters, I haven't listened to the latter in about five years), but the impression I get is that Christie is intended for the intelligent layman while Mulvey is more likely to appeal to the hardcore academic. Christie supplies plenty of analysis, but also a lot of behind-the-scenes information, as well as a great deal of cultural context (you learn a huge amount about the late 1950s Soho sleaze trade).
Much though I enjoyed the Leo Marks documentary on the Criterion disc, I think the Optimum documentaries have more to say about the film itself - so while both releases are excellent, the Optimum would narrowly be my first recommendation for this title.
The Christie commentary is well worth a listen. I'm loath to draw direct comparisons between it and the Laura Mulvey commentary on the Criterion disc (for starters, I haven't listened to the latter in about five years), but the impression I get is that Christie is intended for the intelligent layman while Mulvey is more likely to appeal to the hardcore academic. Christie supplies plenty of analysis, but also a lot of behind-the-scenes information, as well as a great deal of cultural context (you learn a huge amount about the late 1950s Soho sleaze trade).
Much though I enjoyed the Leo Marks documentary on the Criterion disc, I think the Optimum documentaries have more to say about the film itself - so while both releases are excellent, the Optimum would narrowly be my first recommendation for this title.
- Tommaso
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am
The Mulvey commentary, incidentally, is available on its own in written form (only very slightly rephrased) in the excellent collection of essays edited by Ian Christie and Andrew Moor, Michael Powell - International Perspectives on an English Film Maker, published in 2005 to celebrate the 100th birthday of Powell. A fascinating, thoughtful collection, even if there's nothing much on the lesser known films.
- Kinsayder
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: UK
A French release of A Matter of Life and Death is now scheduled for September 18th. The publisher is Seven 7 rather than Warner France, who did the recent P&P boxes. The Seven 7 website makes no mention of this being a restored edition. No extras to speak of, either. This may well just be the Carlton edition with French subs added.Greathinker wrote:What's the status of A Matter of Life and Death and Oh Rosalinda!...? The french releases are never going to see the light of day it seems. Are there any plans else where for these, particularly with the new restoration of AMOLAND?
The Tales of Hoffman will be out soon, Sep 3rd. I can't find any specs. Wonder how the colors will turn out.
- starmanof51
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Seattleish
- Contact:
119 minute running time? A mistake, or the cut version?Greathinker wrote:The Tales of Hoffman will be out soon, Sep 3rd. I can't find any specs. Wonder how the colors will turn out.
- Tommaso
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am
- starmanof51
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Seattleish
- Contact:
- Tommaso
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am
It was perhaps shot open matte, but I don't know how it was exhibited initially. Criterion's 1.33 always looked completely right to me. Dave, I assume you're talking about "Peeping Tom", though, not "Tales of Hoffmann"? And here I agree completely with you, it should be 1.66. Both CC and Optimum (which I find better colourwise, not to speak of the Christie commentary which far outdoes Mulvey) got it wrong.
- starmanof51
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:28 am
- Location: Seattleish
- Contact: