'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

Discuss film culture and criticism
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2476 Post by knives »

Allan Brooks is my favorite Einstein kid.
User avatar
eerik
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2477 Post by eerik »

Not exactly a review but this guy isn't impressed with the recent UK steelbook announcements:
Why are we getting all these old films that hardly anyone has heard of being released in steelbooks, it sucks!

Cant we even get proper oldies like the godfather, sat night fever, gone with wind etc, films that are acutal classics, like the scareface steelbook!
oh yeah
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:45 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2478 Post by oh yeah »

nit-picking Paris, Texas...
Little things about the movie annoy me as well. For example, how does Kinski get into the hotel room. A Texas hotel room door closes and locks automatically. Stanton isn't there, he's in the parking lot below. Hunter doesn't answer the door. For Kinski to enter, Stanton could only have left the door ajar, with an object like a shoe. With Stanton in the parking lot, this leaves the room ripe for robbery or child kidnapping. The scene is cinematic but unlikely.
User avatar
JPJ
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:23 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2479 Post by JPJ »

Amazon UK customer makes a statement about new Rolling Thunder bd/dvd:"clearly it's been transferred straight from video to DVD/Bluray and in my opinion it really should have undergone some "digital cleaning". I wonder if he even bothered to watch past the opening credits sequence(which is in fact,for some reason, in Vhs quality.After that things improve considerably.)before rushing to computer to type this drivel.To my eyes the transfer looked very good(without digital manipulation)especially for a modestly budgeted seventies film.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2480 Post by matrixschmatrix »

On Wings:
A must not buy, just rent it, this is an old movie, it not worth to buy rightnow, i will buy it for a buck free shipping lol.
User avatar
R0lf
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:25 am

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2481 Post by R0lf »

oh yeah wrote:nit-picking Paris, Texas...
Little things about the movie annoy me as well. For example, how does Kinski get into the hotel room. A Texas hotel room door closes and locks automatically. Stanton isn't there, he's in the parking lot below. Hunter doesn't answer the door. For Kinski to enter, Stanton could only have left the door ajar, with an object like a shoe. With Stanton in the parking lot, this leaves the room ripe for robbery or child kidnapping. The scene is cinematic but unlikely.
Oh I know.

[redacted by admin because that's just unnecessary and disgusting]
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2482 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Can we please, please not have a discussion about that
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2483 Post by Zot! »

This review is from Amazon: 3 Days of the Condor (Blu-ray)
it was a terribly poor reproduction, especially in the beginning. we stopped straining in the middle. very dissatisfied.
I know ESL stuff is considered a cheap shot, but I can't stop smiling.
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2484 Post by Brian C »

From the IMDb user reviews of The Wages of Fear:
Two trucks full of explosives have to be transported. Four fierce men try do the job for the money.

This film is highly overrated. None of the actor stick to its character . If you wanna watch this film and you haven't seen it please don't read any further. Here's what I have to say. M. Jo gives away the pistol to his opponent in a brawl and looks heroic but gets scared on his way to deliver the stuff. Why is the brawl scene required? It is suggested that he kills another man so that he can go for the job (he was not selected) but that is not confirmed until the end. You sit for 2.5 hrs to see a truck finally reaching its destination. There are no twists and turns in the film. The only twists director could imagine were a wooden bridge and a big rock. How imaginative. There is a build up of an hour before the film really starts, I thought that one hour was about characterization but thats not true either. Its a waste of two hrs .

Acting wise its OK. I have a problem with the depth of characters so no point in discussing that. I am giving 4 points for oil leak scene and actors who did that scene. A very boring and senseless film. 4/10.
User avatar
tarpilot
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:48 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2485 Post by tarpilot »

Four fierce men try do the job for the money.
So hard for it, honey
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2486 Post by Matt »

Not precisely a review, but so rediculous. To be fair, I guess one does have a spy in it.

Image
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2487 Post by Brian C »

This makes me wonder if there aren't soon to be a whole bunch of very disappointed Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy customers out there.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2488 Post by MichaelB »

My all-time favourite Amazon recommendation:

Image

I actually forwarded that one to Christopher Nupen, director of the Ashkenazy documentary, and he replied saying that he liked to think that Justin Bieber fans were also being pointed in his direction.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2489 Post by Matt »

That's beautiful.
User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:38 am

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2490 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin »

That's fantastic! I think I just tore my thoracic diaphragm. Last night, Stephen Colbert, refuting Ann Patchett's assertion that we need smart bookstore employees to recommend other books, said, "Amazon already has that: 'People who bought this book also bought a socket wrench set.'"
User avatar
tarpilot
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:48 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2491 Post by tarpilot »

The creators of Literally Unbelievable graciously took it upon themselves to do our job for us.
richard_t
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:55 am
Location: Doncaster UK

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2492 Post by richard_t »

Thank you so much for those two links. Fantastic.

***** out of five. ;-p
User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:48 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2493 Post by Oedipax »

0 of 43 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Wait for the fantastic Special Edition due in June!, February 27, 2012

This review is from: Hugo (Three-disc Combo: Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / DVD / Digital Copy) (Blu-ray)

Spread over three Blu-ray discs, the Special Edition performs real movie magic by showing where Scorcese stole the idea for every scene in Hugo! Every time Richard Griffiths gets bitten on the shin by a yappy little dog, the Special Edition replays the original Richard Griffiths bitten on the shin by a yappy little dog scene from Harry Potter. One entire Blu-ray disc contains the stolen bits from most of Giuseppe Tornatore's work. After all, if you're going to pretend to love the cinema, why not grab your love from the best? There's even a special feature on "How we make little kid's eyes look like saucers with bits we stole from The Lord of The Rings movies."

If you prefer hard-snorting Hollywood gossip over cinema/enema, there's a roaring interview with Emil Lager, the guitarist, about how "Scores" promised him all the nose candy he could snort in his two day shoot plus he got to keep the antique guitar he played in the film. "He really jobbed me on the guitar," laughs Emil. "Turned out to just be an old beat-up Harmony and they CGI'd in the nice one. But that's OK. I left it there after taking a dump in it and putting a little note on the fretboard, `Please send to Robbie.'"
:|
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2495 Post by Murdoch »

People get bored, I saw one that was just a list of movies a guy searched for in the past couple of days.
stroszeck
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:42 am

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2496 Post by stroszeck »

Thought this was sort of funny. It's a Yelp review of the ArcLight Cinema in Hollywood:
The Arclight is quite the theater isn't it? Reserved seating, modern set up, huge theaters with huge screens, along with huge prices on pretty much everything. Granted, it's rad not to have to worry about getting a seat and all that, but the price of a ticket here is pretty high. And then you gotta pay for parking as well on the way out, even with a validation. I will give them this though, they do play some good movies that you wouldn't find at a lot of other theaters and do take the time to do some events with Q&A which is always fun. I saw Hesher here with the Q&A and it was pretty rad, except for the part where the girl stood up and told the director how she really related to the movie because she too had lost a loved one. Then she asked her sister to stand up and they both almost started crying. I guess this would be the point when a Q&A goes bad, yeap, that was it. Other than that though it was super awesome. I would def attend another Q&A because the people asking the questions were really interesting and I found what they had to say really interesting, and in no way did I start to laugh at any of the questions or make calls on those people, not at one point. The crying girls didn't make me feel awkward at all either.

So yeah the archlight is awesome, but way overpriced.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2497 Post by domino harvey »

So, two stupid humans and one stupid muppet doing stupid things.
This movie is boring even for my 8 years-old nephew.
I mean, who's the target of this movie? Old people who saw the original Muppet's Show 30 years ago or young people who prefer non-puppetish movies?
I liked the Muppet's Show when I was a kid.. but.. Disney turned the Muppets franchise into a musical-stupidity-musical-stupidity endless cycle.
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2498 Post by Brian C »

Not sure what's so rediculous about that one. I found myself wondering who the movie's target audience is supposed to be as well - it's an unabashed nostalgia trip marketed as the next big family movie franchise. It's surprisingly good-natured for what it is, but still.

And, at least at the show I saw it at (opening weekend, midday Saturday), most of the kids in attendance did seem to be bored. It might have helped if the movie was actually about the Muppets instead of the human characters.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2499 Post by domino harvey »

Haven't seen the film but I appreciated gems like "non-puppetish movies" (quite a large genre!) and "musical-stupidity-musical-stupidity"
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: 'Rediculous' Customer & Critic Reviews

#2500 Post by Brian C »

Yeah, I liked "non-puppetish" too, but it's actually an insightful point in its way, because the movie really can't decide whether it wants to be a Muppet movie for the Gen X set or a (non-puppetish) Jason Segal family comedy. So it splits the difference.

You should see it though - if nothing else, it's got Amy Adams having a "me party".
Post Reply