Forthcoming Kubrick Box
- PfR73
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
That's not anything special about the Kubrick films, Warner as a matter of routine issued almost all 1.85:1 films as 1.78:1 on DVD & Blu-ray, while Criterion typically respects actual 1.85:1. For instance, Body Heat was 1.78:1 on Warner's DVD & Blu-ray, but it's 1.85:1 from Criterion.
-
rrenault
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:49 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
How are you sure about this if no specs have yet been revealed for the set?A Tempted Christ wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 7:08 pm Interestingly, both The Shining and Full Metal Jacket are in 1.85:1 which I assume is how they were originally shown in theaters. Warner's previous releases of those were in 1.78:1.
-
mikeainslie
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2025 2:46 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
for their 4k restorations tho, they've mostly been keeping their 1.85 films in 1.85, and since we never knew what kubrick's philosophy would have been with high-def, i really wish vitali (the same vitali who thought that barry lyndon was never 1.66 and refused to let lolita be presented on dvd in 16:9 anamorphic widescreen because it wasn't shot with anamorphic lenses) didn't insist that the shining and fmj were in 1.78 on their 4ksPfR73 wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 7:29 pm That's not anything special about the Kubrick films, Warner as a matter of routine issued almost all 1.85:1 films as 1.78:1 on DVD & Blu-ray, while Criterion typically respects actual 1.85:1. For instance, Body Heat was 1.78:1 on Warner's DVD & Blu-ray, but it's 1.85:1 from Criterion.
-
mikeainslie
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2025 2:46 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
because the clips in the teaser are in 1.85rrenault wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 7:30 pmHow are you sure about this if no specs have yet been revealed for the set?A Tempted Christ wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 7:08 pm Interestingly, both The Shining and Full Metal Jacket are in 1.85:1 which I assume is how they were originally shown in theaters. Warner's previous releases of those were in 1.78:1.
- PfR73
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I assume it's referring to them being framed 1.85:1 within the Criterion promo video linked above.
- Oedipax
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:48 pm
- Location: Atlanta
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
By "complete," I assume this means they will also include the international cut of The Shining, the deleted original theatrical ending of The Shining, the longer 'premiere' cut of 2001, outtakes of Harvey Keitel and Jennifer Jason Leigh in Eyes Wide Shut, as well as academy ratio variants on The Shining (for both aforementioned cuts), Full Metal Jacket and Eyes Wide Shut (all restored in 4K, naturally). Bonus points if we get the Stargate sequence from 2001 synced to an Atmos mix of Pink Floyd's Echoes. (Yes, I'm aware none of that will happen.)
But I do look forward to re-buying all but one (it's just Lolita, right?) of these titles on 4K and for about the 12th time in general on video, going back to the DVD days
But I do look forward to re-buying all but one (it's just Lolita, right?) of these titles on 4K and for about the 12th time in general on video, going back to the DVD days
-
Mark L.
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:05 am
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I know this is a joke, but I fully expect at least the international cut of The Shining on 4K and stuff like original audio, etc., otherwise this is a complete waste of time and effort from Criterion for a bunch of stuff that has already been released on 4K. I know Criterion has disappointed with this kind of stuff occasionally, but if you get the chance to do this I have to imagine they do it right.Oedipax wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 8:01 pm By "complete," I assume this means they will also include the international cut of The Shining, the deleted original theatrical ending of The Shining, the longer 'premiere' cut of 2001, outtakes of Harvey Keitel and Jennifer Jason Leigh in Eyes Wide Shut, as well as academy ratio variants on The Shining (for both aforementioned cuts), Full Metal Jacket and Eyes Wide Shut (all restored in 4K, naturally). Bonus points if we get the Stargate sequence from 2001 synced to an Atmos mix of Pink Floyd's Echoes. (Yes, I'm aware none of that will happen.)
But I do look forward to re-buying all but one (it's just Lolita, right?) of these titles on 4K and for about the 12th time in general on video, going back to the DVD days![]()
Is there anything else like this we can actually (reasonably) hope for? Would they include both versions of Eyes Wide Shut for completions sake?
-
FlickeringWindow
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:27 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
While I'd rather see 4K boxes for Welles and Kurosawa first, a complete Criterion 4K box of Kubrick will probably outsell the Bergman box within the first year. Also an opportunity for Criterion to be more known for putting out complete box sets for filmmakers. Imagine if this doing well got Disney to hand over the Fox John Ford films for a big box.Mark L. wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 8:21 pmI know this is a joke, but I fully expect at least the international cut of The Shining on 4K and stuff like original audio, etc., otherwise this is a complete waste of time and effort from Criterion for a bunch of stuff that has already been released on 4K. I know Criterion has disappointed with this kind of stuff occasionally, but if you get the chance to do this I have to imagine they do it right.Oedipax wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 8:01 pm By "complete," I assume this means they will also include the international cut of The Shining, the deleted original theatrical ending of The Shining, the longer 'premiere' cut of 2001, outtakes of Harvey Keitel and Jennifer Jason Leigh in Eyes Wide Shut, as well as academy ratio variants on The Shining (for both aforementioned cuts), Full Metal Jacket and Eyes Wide Shut (all restored in 4K, naturally). Bonus points if we get the Stargate sequence from 2001 synced to an Atmos mix of Pink Floyd's Echoes. (Yes, I'm aware none of that will happen.)
But I do look forward to re-buying all but one (it's just Lolita, right?) of these titles on 4K and for about the 12th time in general on video, going back to the DVD days![]()
Is there anything else like this we can actually (reasonably) hope for? Would they include both versions of Eyes Wide Shut for completions sake?
- Oedipax
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:48 pm
- Location: Atlanta
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
That's a very good point about the original audio, and I hope Criterion won't let us down there with choosing between mono and more modern mixes!
In terms of other extras, I'd love it if they stacked these with all the existing commentary tracks throughout the years and added some new ones to boot.
Regarding EWS, I think it would be a shame to dedicate another disc to some crappy CGI fig leaves - I'd much rather have the 'helicopter shadow' cut of The Shining, thank you very much. But an extra feature that delved into the initial release of the film, the CGI figures being added, certain things in the sound mix and music tracks being tweaked after Kubrick's death, etc, would be extremely interesting, and also incredibly unlikely to happen.
The aspect ratios in the trailer for some films being 1.85:1 instead of 1.78:1 does lead me to hope some of these will be fresh 4K transfers/encodes. Does anyone know if there are encode issues for any of the existing 4Ks? Aside from a little macroblocking reported in the Barry Lyndon 4K from Criterion, I don't remember hearing about anything else.
In terms of other extras, I'd love it if they stacked these with all the existing commentary tracks throughout the years and added some new ones to boot.
Regarding EWS, I think it would be a shame to dedicate another disc to some crappy CGI fig leaves - I'd much rather have the 'helicopter shadow' cut of The Shining, thank you very much. But an extra feature that delved into the initial release of the film, the CGI figures being added, certain things in the sound mix and music tracks being tweaked after Kubrick's death, etc, would be extremely interesting, and also incredibly unlikely to happen.
The aspect ratios in the trailer for some films being 1.85:1 instead of 1.78:1 does lead me to hope some of these will be fresh 4K transfers/encodes. Does anyone know if there are encode issues for any of the existing 4Ks? Aside from a little macroblocking reported in the Barry Lyndon 4K from Criterion, I don't remember hearing about anything else.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
It would be trivially easy to seamlessly branch both versions of Eyes Wide Shut onto a single disc. And very possibly The Shining, too.
It only gets tricky if there are loads of differences—for instance, to cite a project I worked on myself, Indicator’s Patrick contains seamlessly-branched 4K UHD versions of the Australian and Italian cuts of Patrick, but there were so many changes made to the US cut that we ended up having to include a complete feature encode in HD only. (It’s no great loss; it’s a watch-once curio.)
It only gets tricky if there are loads of differences—for instance, to cite a project I worked on myself, Indicator’s Patrick contains seamlessly-branched 4K UHD versions of the Australian and Italian cuts of Patrick, but there were so many changes made to the US cut that we ended up having to include a complete feature encode in HD only. (It’s no great loss; it’s a watch-once curio.)
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
As a sound person, I'd love to see both the original mono tracks and the original surround tracks for SPARTICUS and 2001. And the original/corrected mono track for SHINING.
-
nowhereisaplace
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:43 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I also hope the include both versions of Day of the Fight and both versions of Fear and Desire.
-
DimitriL
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
One of the more consistent leaks has been that both versions of The Shining will be included. They were both completely valid cuts as far as Kubrick was concerned, so it would make sense. Their track record on original audio has been pretty terrific lately. (People were very happy when they didn’t just fix the audio for The Wiz on its second printing, but added the original audio as an option.)Mark L. wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 8:21 pm
I know this is a joke, but I fully expect at least the international cut of The Shining on 4K and stuff like original audio, etc., otherwise this is a complete waste of time and effort from Criterion for a bunch of stuff that has already been released on 4K. I know Criterion has disappointed with this kind of stuff occasionally, but if you get the chance to do this I have to imagine they do it right.
Is there anything else like this we can actually (reasonably) hope for? Would they include both versions of Eyes Wide Shut for completions sake?
Eyes Wide Shut is highly unlikely. The current cut is considered the one he would’ve approved, though I’m guessing the FX-treated footage will show up as part of a supplement.
-
beamish14
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I mean, we’ve long sailed past Kubrick’s original intentions with Fear and Desire, so what’s the harm of including that reel’s worth of deleted scenes from 2001?
- The Fanciful Norwegian
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:24 pm
- Location: Teegeeack
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Kubrick wasn't even able to keep it from circulation when he was alive and now anyone who wants to watch it can just stream it free and clear (since it's public domain) from a bajillion online sources. At this point I'd say there's a reasonable argument that doing an "official" release is preferable to letting it continue to circulate exclusively in unauthorized editions. The deleted prologue to 2001 (and the original ending of The Shining, the pie fight scene from Strangelove, etc.) aren't in the same boat, as much as I'd love to see them myself.
-
beamish14
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I forgot about the pie fight. He showed it to Terry Southern in 1994, so it probably still existsThe Fanciful Norwegian wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 2:04 am Kubrick wasn't even able to keep it from circulation when he was alive and now anyone who wants to watch it can just stream it free and clear (since it's public domain) from a bajillion online sources. At this point I'd say there's a reasonable argument that doing an "official" release is preferable to letting it continue to circulate exclusively in unauthorized editions. The deleted prologue to 2001 (and the original ending of The Shining, the pie fight scene from Strangelove, etc.) aren't in the same boat, as much as I'd love to see them myself.
- Tuppence
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:52 am
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
The "international cut" of The Shining might be better thought of as Kubrick's preferred cut. In Lee Unkrich's book, Warner Bros executive Julian Senior quoted Kubrick as saying to him: "I think the movie was good, but I think some of the stuff I took out made the movie better." I've found people usually prefer whichever version they saw first though.Mark L. wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 8:21 pmI know this is a joke, but I fully expect at least the international cut of The Shining on 4K and stuff like original audio, etc., otherwise this is a complete waste of time and effort from Criterion for a bunch of stuff that has already been released on 4K. I know Criterion has disappointed with this kind of stuff occasionally, but if you get the chance to do this I have to imagine they do it right.
- Finch
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I wasn't keen on a Kubrick set but since David MacKenzie is encoding the entire set (fixing the one issue with Criterion's original Barry Lyndon 4k) and we're getting original audio on some of the Warner titles, I'm probably going to offload everything I already bought.
-
nicolas
- Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:34 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
So far, David only liked a post that linked to Criterion’s teaser. He’s probably involved in the set but he could be just as enthusiastic about it as most of us. The recipient of David’s like unsurprisingly saw it as a confirmation and spread the word accordingly. I also hope for a Barry Lyndon re-encode but I’ll believe it when I see it as there’d technically be no reason for them to re-do it unless they add an audio commentary.
-
Stefan Andersson
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:02 am
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
A mono soundtrack for The Shining would be welcome because of mistakes in the sound/music remixing. Discussion starts at approx. 16:37 in this video:
https://archive.org/details/ShiningPhilology
See also:
https://www.gordonstainforth.co.uk/shining-music-intro
https://blah-ray.blogspot.com/2019/12/t ... -1980.html
https://archive.org/details/ShiningPhilology
See also:
https://www.gordonstainforth.co.uk/shining-music-intro
https://blah-ray.blogspot.com/2019/12/t ... -1980.html
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Yes, that Shining video essay is insanely useful.
-
rrenault
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:49 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
It’s of course possible David M is only doing some but not all the encodes in the set.nicolas wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 8:25 am So far, David only liked a post that linked to Criterion’s teaser. He’s probably involved in the set but he could be just as enthusiastic about it as most of us. The recipient of David’s like unsurprisingly saw it as a confirmation and spread the word accordingly. I also hope for a Barry Lyndon re-encode but I’ll believe it when I see it as there’d technically be no reason for them to re-do it unless they add an audio commentary.
For instance, when Arrow did their Psycho set, the 4K of the original Hitchcock film was a direct port from the Universal disc while the sequels were all in-house jobs, so we’ll see if this ends up being a similar scenario where Criterion are hamstrung in terms of what they can do with the titles WB have released themselves in North America.
I’d say there’s a pretty good chance FiM do Lolita and the UA titles at the very least.
It would be cheap of them in my opinion to release a re-encoded Barry Lyndon just to lock it in a box set, especially only a year after releasing the standalone.
Last edited by rrenault on Fri Jun 19, 2026 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- The Fanciful Norwegian
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:24 pm
- Location: Teegeeack
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
The National Film Theatre screened it at a Kubrick tribute/retrospective in 1999. Columbia apparently donated the footage to the National Film Archive (now the BFI National Archive) shortly after the film's release.beamish14 wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 3:22 am I forgot about the pie fight. He showed it to Terry Southern in 1994, so it probably still exists
-
DimitriL
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:07 pm
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I know there was an opening logo change so it was kind of necessary, but they did take the opportunity to fairly dramatically re-encode Trainspotting.nicolas wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 8:25 am So far, David only liked a post that linked to Criterion’s teaser. He’s probably involved in the set but he could be just as enthusiastic about it as most of us. The recipient of David’s like unsurprisingly saw it as a confirmation and spread the word accordingly. I also hope for a Barry Lyndon re-encode but I’ll believe it when I see it as there’d technically be no reason for them to re-do it unless they add an audio commentary.
-
nitin
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:49 am
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
I dont know about "dramatically", noticeably yes (and even then not for most) but dramatically is hyperbole IMHO